Abstract An anatomic pathology diagnostic error may be secondary to a number of active and latent technical and/or cognitive components, which may occur anywhere along the total testing process in clinical and/or laboratory domains. For the pathologist interpretive steps of diagnosis, we examine Kahneman’s framework of slow and fast thinking to explain different causes of error in precision (agreement) and in accuracy (truth). The pathologist cognitive diagnostic process involves image pattern recognition and a slow thinking error may be caused by the application of different rationally-constructed mental maps of image criteria/patterns by different pathologists. This type of error is partly related to a system failure in standardizing the application of these maps. A fast thinking error involves the flawed leap from image pattern to incorrect diagnosis. In the ideal state, anatomic pathology systems would target these cognitive error causes as well as the technical latent factors that lead to error.
[1]
S. Spear,et al.
Decoding the DNA of the Toyota Production System
,
1999
.
[2]
F. Meier,et al.
Clinical impact and frequency of anatomic pathology errors in cancer diagnoses
,
2005,
Cancer.
[3]
S. Raab,et al.
Clinical impact and frequency of anatomic pathology errors in cancer diagnoses
,
2005,
Cancer.
[4]
Stephen S. Raab,et al.
Quality in Cancer Diagnosis
,
2010,
CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.
[5]
A. Tversky,et al.
Choices, Values, and Frames
,
2000
.
[6]
D. Kahneman.
Thinking, Fast and Slow
,
2011
.
[7]
L. Kohn,et al.
To Err Is Human : Building a Safer Health System
,
2007
.