Automatic 3D reconstruction of mitochondrion with local intensity distribution signature and shape feature

Mitochondria play an important role in cellular physiology and synaptic function. Recent electron microscopy (EM) advances make it possible to observe mitochondrial structure on nanoscale, but the attendant massive EM data unfortunately requires months of tedious manual labor. In this paper, we present an automatic approach for the 3D reconstruction of mitochondria from anisotropic EM stack. We first extract a novel local intensity distribution signature (LIDS) feature and learn a random forest classifier (RF) in x-y directions to obtain coarse superpixels. A random disjoint-set forest algorithm can then cluster these superpixels into supervoxels. Next, we use a 3D erosion and dilation method to discard unsatisfying structures, e.g., neural membrane or synapse. At last, the second random forest classifier is learned combining with mitochondrial shape and texture features, which can select the real mitochondria effectively. The confidence values are given to help human experts decide which mitochondrion to be reviewed first. We evaluate the proposed approach on two different anisotropic EM stacks of drosophila brain and compare against the current state-of-the-art methods.

[1]  Eric L. Miller,et al.  Segmentation fusion for connectomics , 2011, 2011 International Conference on Computer Vision.

[2]  Rein van den Boomgaard,et al.  Methods for fast morphological image transforms using bitmapped binary images , 1992, CVGIP Graph. Model. Image Process..

[3]  Bill Triggs,et al.  Histograms of oriented gradients for human detection , 2005, 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'05).

[4]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Random Forests , 2001, Machine Learning.

[5]  J. Sanes,et al.  Ome sweet ome: what can the genome tell us about the connectome? , 2008, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[6]  S. Campello,et al.  Mitochondrial shape changes: orchestrating cell pathophysiology , 2010, EMBO reports.

[7]  G LoweDavid,et al.  Distinctive Image Features from Scale-Invariant Keypoints , 2004 .

[8]  Matti Pietikäinen,et al.  A comparative study of texture measures with classification based on featured distributions , 1996, Pattern Recognit..

[9]  Joachim M. Buhmann,et al.  Probabilistic image registration and anomaly detection by nonlinear warping , 2008, 2008 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[10]  Ting Liu,et al.  Watershed merge tree classification for electron microscopy image segmentation , 2012, Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR2012).

[11]  Jan van Leeuwen,et al.  Worst-case Analysis of Set Union Algorithms , 1984, JACM.

[12]  Pascal Fua,et al.  Supervoxel-Based Segmentation of Mitochondria in EM Image Stacks With Learned Shape Features , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[13]  Luigi di Stefano,et al.  A simple and efficient connected components labeling algorithm , 1999, Proceedings 10th International Conference on Image Analysis and Processing.

[14]  Pascal Fua,et al.  Efficient Scanning for EM Based Target Localization , 2012, MICCAI.

[15]  Angela C. Poole,et al.  The PINK1/Parkin pathway regulates mitochondrial morphology , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[16]  David G. Lowe,et al.  Distinctive Image Features from Scale-Invariant Keypoints , 2004, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[17]  Joachim M. Buhmann,et al.  Neuron geometry extraction by perceptual grouping in ssTEM images , 2010, 2010 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[18]  John G. Daugman,et al.  Complete discrete 2-D Gabor transforms by neural networks for image analysis and compression , 1988, IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process..

[19]  Matthew Cook,et al.  Efficient automatic 3D-reconstruction of branching neurons from EM data , 2012, 2012 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.