Effects of different etching modes on the nanoleakage of universal adhesives: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

PURPOSE The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate how etching modes affect the nanoleakage of universal adhesive from in vitro studies. MATERIALS AND METHODS PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, Scopus and Science Direct electronic databases were searched for in vitro studies that evaluated the nanoleakage of universal adhesives. A total of 511 (after duplicate removal) potentially relevant records were identified in the literature search. The titles and abstracts of the retrieved studies were screened by two independent researchers according to the main concept. Subsequently, the full text of potentially relevant studies was screened using the exclusion criteria. Thirteen studies were subjected to qualitative analysis, and 5 of them were selected for a detailed meta-analysis. RESULTS Seven universal adhesives were evaluated in this review. The meta-analysis demonstrated that the etch-and-rinse technique significantly reduced the nanoleakage of the Peak Universal and G-Bond Plus adhesives, whereas the self-etch mode reduced the nanoleakage of All-Bond Universal. In comparison, the etching technique did not significantly alter the nanoleakage of either Prime&Bond Elect or Scotchbond Universal which was characterized by the smallest nanoleakage. CONCLUSIONS Etching modes significantly, in various ways, influence the nanoleakage of universal adhesives. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE Contrary to the drive to simplify bonding technologies, an appreciation of their adhesive components and how these perform according to bonding technique could yield a knowledge-based practical approach that ultimately improves the longevity of direct composite restorations.

[1]  Nara Hellen Campanha Bombarda,et al.  Influence of a hydrophobic resin coating on the bonding efficacy of three universal adhesives. , 2014, Journal of dentistry.

[2]  Franklin R Tay,et al.  Reactivation of inactivated endogenous proteolytic activities in phosphoric acid-etched dentine by etch-and-rinse adhesives. , 2006, Biomaterials.

[3]  M F de Goes,et al.  In vivo Preservation of the Hybrid Layer by Chlorhexidine , 2007, Journal of dental research.

[4]  J. Perdigão,et al.  Dentin adhesion and MMPs: a comprehensive review. , 2013, Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry : official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry ... [et al.].

[5]  A. Mine,et al.  Inhibition of Enzymatic Degradation of Adhesive-Dentin Interfaces , 2009, Journal of dental research.

[6]  D. Moher,et al.  Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement , 2009, BMJ.

[7]  F. Tay,et al.  Adhesive performance of a multi-mode adhesive system: 1-year in vitro study. , 2014, Journal of dentistry.

[8]  K. Jiao,et al.  Bonding of universal adhesives to dentine--Old wine in new bottles? , 2015, Journal of dentistry.

[9]  M. Wevers,et al.  Micro-rotary fatigue of tooth-biomaterial interfaces. , 2003, Biomaterials.

[10]  A. Mine,et al.  State of the art of self-etch adhesives. , 2011, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[11]  S. Inoue,et al.  New concept of resin-dentin interfacial adhesion: the nanointeraction zone. , 2006, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials.

[12]  D. Pashley,et al.  Bonding of a self-etching primer to non-carious cervical sclerotic dentin: interfacial ultrastructure and microtensile bond strength evaluation. , 2000, The journal of adhesive dentistry.

[13]  T. Hayakawa,et al.  Influence of self-etching primer treatment on the adhesion of resin composite to polished dentin and enamel. , 1998, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[14]  S. Minagi,et al.  Nanolayering of phosphoric acid ester monomer on enamel and dentin. , 2011, Acta biomaterialia.

[15]  D. Pashley,et al.  Aggressiveness of contemporary self-etching systems. I: Depth of penetration beyond dentin smear layers. , 2001, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[16]  A. Mine,et al.  Bonding effectiveness of a new 'multi-mode' adhesive to enamel and dentine. , 2012, Journal of dentistry.

[17]  S. Ichinose,et al.  Effect of Scrubbing Technique with Mild Self-etching Adhesives on Dentin Bond Strengths and Nanoleakage Expression. , 2016, The journal of adhesive dentistry.

[18]  K. Söderholm.  Dental adhesives .... how it all started and later evolved. , 2007, The journal of adhesive dentistry.

[19]  R. Belli,et al.  Bonding performance of universal adhesives in different etching modes. , 2014, Journal of dentistry.

[20]  J. Ferracane,et al.  In vitro aging of dental composites in water--effect of degree of conversion, filler volume, and filler/matrix coupling. , 1998, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[21]  A. Ritter.  Dental adhesives. , 2006, Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry : official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry ... [et al.].

[22]  M. Hashimoto,et al.  In vitro durability of one-bottle resin adhesives bonded to dentin. , 2007, Dental materials journal.

[23]  H. Staehle,et al.  Relationship between microtensile bond strength and nanoleakage at the composite-dentin interface. , 2009, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[24]  F. Tay,et al.  Resistance of ten contemporary adhesives to resin-dentine bond degradation. , 2008, Journal of dentistry.

[25]  J. Perdigão,et al.  Laboratory bonding ability of a multi-purpose dentin adhesive. , 2012, American journal of dentistry.

[26]  A. Reis,et al.  In vitro longevity of bonding properties of universal adhesives to dentin. , 2015, Operative dentistry.

[27]  Shuichi Ito,et al.  Conversion of one-step to two-step self-etch adhesives for improved efficacy and extended application. , 2005, American journal of dentistry.

[28]  P. Lambrechts,et al.  Buonocore memorial lecture. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: current status and future challenges. , 2003, Operative dentistry.

[29]  F. Tay,et al.  Water treeing--a potential mechanism for degradation of dentin adhesives. , 2003, American journal of dentistry.

[30]  J. Perdigão,et al.  Influence of a hydrophobic resin coating on the immediate and 6-month dentin bonding of three universal adhesives. , 2015, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[31]  P. Lambrechts,et al.  Systematic review of the chemical composition of contemporary dental adhesives. , 2007, Biomaterials.

[32]  R. Moraes,et al.  The role of resin cement on bond strength of glass-fiber posts luted into root canals: a systematic review and meta-analysis of in vitro studies. , 2014, Operative dentistry.

[33]  T. Caneppele,et al.  Effects of surface hydration state and application method on the bond strength of self-etching adhesives to cut enamel. , 2012, The journal of adhesive dentistry.

[34]  Y. Yoshida,et al.  Self-assembled Nano-layering at the Adhesive Interface , 2012, Journal of dental research.

[35]  T. Lenzi,et al.  Bonding Performance of a Multimode Adhesive to Artificially-induced Caries-affected Primary Dentin. , 2015, The journal of adhesive dentistry.

[36]  D. Pashley,et al.  Nanoleakage at the dentin adhesive interface vs microtensile bond strength. , 1999, Operative dentistry.

[37]  S. Geraldeli,et al.  Improving clinical retention of one-step self-etching adhesive systems with an additional hydrophobic adhesive layer , 2009, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[38]  P. Senawongse,et al.  Effect of dentine smear layer on the performance of self-etching adhesive systems: A micro-tensile bond strength study. , 2010, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials.

[39]  Jinxin Guo,et al.  Nanoleakage evaluation at adhesive-dentin interfaces by different observation methods. , 2015, Dental materials journal.

[40]  Lorenzo Breschi,et al.  Dental adhesion review: aging and stability of the bonded interface. , 2008, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[41]  M V Cardoso,et al.  Current aspects on bonding effectiveness and stability in adhesive dentistry. , 2011, Australian dental journal.

[42]  F. Tay,et al.  Use of a specific MMP-inhibitor (galardin) for preservation of hybrid layer. , 2010, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[43]  Nara Hellen Campanha Bombarda,et al.  Immediate bonding properties of universal adhesives to dentine. , 2013, Journal of dentistry.

[44]  A. Sadr,et al.  Assessment of current adhesives in class I cavity: Nondestructive imaging using optical coherence tomography and microtensile bond strength. , 2015, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[45]  B. Darvell,et al.  Thermal cycling procedures for laboratory testing of dental restorations. , 1999, Journal of dentistry.

[46]  E. Swift,et al.  Universal Adhesives. , 2015, Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry : official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry ... [et al.].

[47]  F. Tay,et al.  Variability in Microleakage Observed in a Total-etch Wet-bonding Technique under Different Handling Conditions , 1995, Journal of dental research.

[48]  J. Perdigão,et al.  Immediate adhesive properties to dentin and enamel of a universal adhesive associated with a hydrophobic resin coat. , 2014, Operative dentistry.

[49]  S. Ichinose,et al.  Nanoleakage in Hybrid Layer and Acid–Base Resistant Zone at the Adhesive/Dentin Interface , 2015, Microscopy and Microanalysis.

[50]  H. Sano,et al.  Microporous dentin zone beneath resin-impregnated layer. , 1994, Operative dentistry.

[51]  F. Tay,et al.  State of the art etch-and-rinse adhesives. , 2011, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[52]  C. B. André,et al.  Effect of Storage Time on Bond Strength and Nanoleakage Expression of Universal Adhesives Bonded to Dentin and Etched Enamel. , 2016, Operative dentistry.

[53]  W. G. Matthews,et al.  Nanoleakage: leakage within the hybrid layer. , 1995, Operative dentistry.

[54]  A. Reis,et al.  Can the durability of one-step self-etch adhesives be improved by double application or by an extra layer of hydrophobic resin? , 2008, Journal of dentistry.

[55]  M. Okazaki,et al.  Comparative Study on Adhesive Performance of Functional Monomers , 2004, Journal of dental research.

[56]  P. Lambrechts,et al.  A Critical Review of the Durability of Adhesion to Tooth Tissue: Methods and Results , 2005, Journal of dental research.

[57]  S. Geraldeli,et al.  Improving clinical retention of one-step self-etching adhesive systems with an additional hydrophobic adhesive layer , 2009, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[58]  A. Reis,et al.  Effect of 3-year water storage on the performance of one-step self-etch adhesives applied actively on dentine. , 2011, Journal of dentistry.

[59]  N. King,et al.  Bonding of mild self-etching primers/adhesives to dentin with thick smear layers. , 2003, American journal of dentistry.

[60]  J. Perdigão,et al.  Effects of solvent evaporation time on immediate adhesive properties of universal adhesives to dentin. , 2014, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[61]  G. Mazzotti,et al.  Analysis of differential artificial ageing of the adhesive interface produced by a two-step etch-and-rinse adhesive. , 2009, European journal of oral sciences.

[62]  A. Manso,et al.  EFFECT OF AN ADDITIONAL HYDROPHILIC VERSUS HYDROPHOBIC COAT ON THE QUALITY OF DENTINAL SEALING PROVIDED BY TWO-STEP ETCH-AND-RINSE ADHESIVES , 2009, Journal of applied oral science : revista FOB.