Aggregated Model of Data Network for the Provision of Demand Response in Generation and Transmission Expansion Planning

A two-stage Internet data center (IDC)-considered framework in generation and transmission expansion planning (GTEP) (referred to as IGTEP) is proposed to make full use of IDCs’ spatial and chronological load regulation potentials for demand response. Stage one aggregates the data network (DN) to match a transmission network structure. First, IDC load is modeled based on the DN configuration. Second, the aggregated DN (ADN) is proposed to model DN with aggregated front-end servers (FSs) and data flows, where an intuitively accurate mathematical relationship among IDCs is developed. Third, the virtual power network (VPN) is proposed to provide a model for ADN with electrical variables, where the coupling of DN and power network (PN) is proposed to develop a linear aggregated IDC load model. Stage two coordinates IDC DR and GTEP, in which the load coupling among multiple IDCs is managed by VPN and the corresponding IDC load model is compatible with the conventional GTEP load. Simulation results verify the efficiency of the proposed VPN and IDC load model. Simulation results also show that IDC DR may reduce the total IGTEP cost significantly, which implies that DN can play a role equivalent to power lines and generators in power system planning and operations.

[1]  Miao Pan,et al.  Colocation Data Center Demand Response Using Nash Bargaining Theory , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[2]  V. Vittal,et al.  A Mixed-Integer Linear Programming Approach for Multi-Stage Security-Constrained Transmission Expansion Planning , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[3]  Xue Liu,et al.  Hedging Against Uncertainty: A Tale of Internet Data Center Operations Under Smart Grid Environment , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[4]  Ciwei Gao,et al.  Internet data centers participating in demand response: A comprehensive review , 2020 .

[5]  Ishfaq Ahmad,et al.  A Framework for Expansion Planning of Data Centers in Electricity and Data Networks Under Uncertainty , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[6]  Ciwei Gao,et al.  Thermal Battery Modeling of Inverter Air Conditioning for Demand Response , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[7]  Zhi Chen,et al.  Real-Time Price-Based Demand Response Management for Residential Appliances via Stochastic Optimization and Robust Optimization , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[8]  Yang Liu,et al.  Restoration of Power Distribution Systems With Multiple Data Centers as Critical Loads , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[9]  Amin Vahdat,et al.  A scalable, commodity data center network architecture , 2008, SIGCOMM '08.

[10]  Jonathan L. Ho,et al.  Economic Analysis of Transmission Expansion Planning With Price-Responsive Demand and Quadratic Losses by Successive LP , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[11]  Zhi Chen,et al.  Electric Demand Response Management for Distributed Large-Scale Internet Data Centers , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[12]  Adam Wierman,et al.  Energy Portfolio Optimization of Data Centers , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[13]  Xu Wang,et al.  Optimal DR Activation Strategy for Risk Aversion Considering Hourly Loads and Locational Prices , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[14]  Ross Baldick,et al.  Stochastic Transmission Capacity Expansion Planning With Special Scenario Selection for Integrating $N-1$ Contingency Analysis , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[15]  M. Shahidehpour,et al.  Market-Based Generation and Transmission Planning With Uncertainties , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[16]  Jose M. Arroyo,et al.  An Adjustable Robust Optimization Approach for Contingency-Constrained Transmission Expansion Planning , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[17]  Hao Wang,et al.  Proactive Demand Response for Data Centers: A Win-Win Solution , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[18]  Abdullah Abusorrah,et al.  Optimal Consensus-Based Distributed Control Strategy for Coordinated Operation of Networked Microgrids , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[19]  Miadreza Shafie-Khah,et al.  Demand Response in Future Power Networks: Panorama and State-of-the-art , 2018, Studies in Systems, Decision and Control.

[20]  M. Fotuhi-Firuzabad,et al.  Incorporating Large-Scale Distant Wind Farms in Probabilistic Transmission Expansion Planning—Part II: Case Studies , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[21]  M. Shahidehpour,et al.  Coordination of Short-Term Operation Constraints in Multi-Area Expansion Planning , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[22]  Amir Abdollahi,et al.  Probabilistic Multiobjective Transmission Expansion Planning Incorporating Demand Response Resources and Large-Scale Distant Wind Farms , 2017, IEEE Systems Journal.

[23]  Jing Qiu,et al.  Probabilistic transmission expansion planning considering distributed generation and demand response programs , 2017 .

[24]  Probability Subcommittee,et al.  IEEE Reliability Test System , 1979, IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems.

[25]  M. Shahidehpour,et al.  A Multi-Objective Framework for Transmission Expansion Planning in Deregulated Environments , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.