Interval Timing by an Invertebrate, the Bumble Bee Bombus impatiens

Sensitivity to temporal information and the ability to adjust behavior to the temporal structure of the environment should be phylogenetically widespread. Some timing abilities, such as sensitivity to circadian cycles, appear in a wide range of invertebrate and vertebrate taxa [1,2]. Interval timing--sensitivity to the duration of time intervals--has, however, only been shown to occur in vertebrates [3,4]. Insect pollinators make a variety of decisions that would appear to require the ability to estimate elapsed durations. We exposed bumble bees to conditions in which proboscis extension was reinforced after a fixed duration had elapsed or after either of two fixed durations had elapsed. Two groups of bees were trained with a short duration (either 6 s or 12 s) and a long duration (36 s) in separate experimental phases (independent timing groups), whereas two other groups were trained with a short duration (either 6 s or 12 s) and long duration (36 s) always intermixed unpredictably (multiple timing groups). On long intervals, independent timing groups waited longer than mixed timing groups to generate the first response and responded maximally near the end of the interval. Multiple timing groups waited the same amount of time on average before generating the first response on both long and short intervals. On individual trials, multiple timing groups appeared to time either the long duration only or both the short and long durations: most trials were characterized by a single burst of responding that began between the short and long duration values or by two bursts of responding with the first burst bracketing the short value and the second burst beginning in anticipation of the long value. These results show that bumble bees learn to time interval durations and can flexibly time multiple durations simultaneously. The results indicate no phylogenetic divide between vertebrates and invertebrates in interval timing ability.

[1]  R. Morse The Dance Language and Orientation of Bees , 1994 .

[2]  Don R. Reynolds,et al.  A landscape‐scale study of bumble bee foraging range and constancy, using harmonic radar , 1999 .

[3]  永福 智志 The Organization of Learning , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[4]  Jonathan Henderson,et al.  Timing in Free-Living Rufous Hummingbirds, Selasphorus rufus , 2006, Current Biology.

[5]  S. Pratt Quorum sensing by encounter rates in the ant Temnothorax albipennis , 2005 .

[6]  T. S. Collett,et al.  Places and patterns — a study of context learning in honeybees , 1997, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[7]  Warren H. Meck,et al.  Abstraction of Temporal Attributes , 1982 .

[8]  K. Ohashi,et al.  CONSEQUENCES OF FLORAL COMPLEXITY FOR BUMBLEBEE‐MEDIATED GEITONOGAMOUS SELF‐POLLINATION IN SALVIA NIPPONICA MIQ. (LABIATAE) , 2002, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[9]  T. Seeley,et al.  Why search time to find a food-storer bee accurately indicates the relative rates of nectar collecting and nectar processing in honey bee colonies , 1994, Animal Behaviour.

[10]  W. Meck Functional and neural mechanisms of interval timing , 2003 .

[11]  W A Roberts,et al.  Timing light and tone signals in pigeons. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[12]  J. Wearden,et al.  Multiple-interval timing in rats: Performance on two-valued mixed fixed-interval schedules. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[13]  M V Srinivasan,et al.  Honeybee navigation: nature and calibration of the "odometer". , 2000, Science.

[14]  George Adrian Horridge,et al.  Pattern vision in honeybees (Apis mellifera): Flower-like patterns with no predominant orientation , 1995 .

[15]  I. Edery,et al.  Circadian rhythms in a nutshell. , 2000, Physiological genomics.

[16]  H. Lejeune,et al.  Time in animal behaviour , 1980 .

[17]  J. Gibbon,et al.  Simultaneous timing of multiple intervals: implications of the scalar property. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[18]  F. Gill,et al.  TRAPLINE FORAGING BY HERMIT HUMMINGBIRDS: COMPETITION FOR AN UNDEFENDED, RENEWABLE RESOURCE' , 1988 .

[19]  N. Waser Flower Constancy: Definition, Cause, and Measurement , 1986, The American Naturalist.

[20]  Thomas T. Hills Towards a unified theory of animal event timing , 2003 .

[21]  G. S. Reynolds,et al.  A quantitative analysis of the responding maintained by interval schedules of reinforcement. , 1968, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[22]  Ralph E. Mistlberger,et al.  Circadian food-anticipatory activity: Formal models and physiological mechanisms , 1994, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[23]  L. Chittka,et al.  Flower Constancy, Insect Psychology, and Plant Evolution , 1999, Naturwissenschaften.

[24]  J. Wearden,et al.  The comparative psychology of fixed-interval responding: Some quantitative analyses ☆ , 1991 .

[25]  J. H. van Hateren,et al.  Pattern recognition in bees: orientation discrimination , 1990, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[26]  K. Frisch The dance language and orientation of bees , 1967 .

[27]  W. Maddison,et al.  Behavior of bumble bee pollinators of Aralia hispida Vent. (Araliaceae) , 1982, Oecologia.

[28]  R. Menzel,et al.  Symmetry perception in an insect , 1996, Nature.

[29]  M. Srinivasan,et al.  The concepts of ‘sameness’ and ‘difference’ in an insect , 2001, Nature.