Old-Age Pension Reform in Estonia on the Basis of the World Bank's Multi Pillar Approach

The current literature about old-age pensions can be characterised by the numerous analyses of pension system reforms in developed countries as well as in developing ones. Although the radical change in economic and social values during the process of transition from command economy to market economy offers many special cases for economists as well as social scientists, only some of them have analysed the developments of pension systems in Central and Eastern European countries. Therefore, the purpose of the present paper is to analyse the adjustments in publicly managed pillar as well the implementation of the funded component of pensions in Estonia, described by previous analyses in general as successful reforms in comparison with the other transition countries. Firstly, in the working paper the aims and the design of the pension system as well as main factors determining pension reform are studied on a theoretical basis. Next, the general overview of the reforms and more specific assessment of the changes in publicly managed scheme and the implementation of the funded scheme in Estonia are given. Finally, the challenges of the multi-pillar pension scheme in Estonia are described and in order to cope successfully with these challenges, some suggestions are made. The study explains that the undervaluation of the social dimension in comparison with the economic one has taken place during the transition period. The pension reform has to some extent ensured the financial sustainability of the pension system, but not fulfilled the two other objectives defined in 2001 by the European Council in Goteborg as a basis of sustainability of the pension system – to guarantee safe and adequate pensions and to respond to the changing needs of society and individuals. The present old-age pensioners (as well as the pensioners in the future) are directly placed at the risk of poverty and the opportunities of elderly people to participate in the societal life are very limited in comparison to the active population. The changes in publicly managed scheme as well as the implementation of the mandatory funded system (II pillar) and supplementary funded system (III pillar) during the period 1997–2002 have not been successful in avoiding potential demographic and macroeconomic risks in the near future.

[1]  M. Brady.  Social Protection in Europe , 2006 .

[2]  N. Plumridge.  On pension reform. , 2005, The Health service journal.

[3]  M. Augusztinovics.  Issues in Pension System Design , 2002 .

[4]  N. Barr.  Reforming Pensions: Myths, Truths, and Policy Choices , 2000, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[5]  Raúl L. Madrid.  Understanding the wave of pension reforms , 2000 .

[6]  K. Schmidt-Hebbel,et al.  Pensions systems and reform : country experiences and research issues , 1999 .

[7]  W. Schmähl.  Fundamental Decisions for the Reform of Pension Systems , 1999 .

[8]  Anita M. Schwarz.  Taking stock of pension reforms around the world , 1999 .

[9]  B. Given,et al.  Averting the old age crisis: Policies to protect the old and promote growth , 1996 .

[10]  K. Schmidt-Hebbel,et al.  Pension Systems and Reform: Country Experiences and Research Issues , 1995 .

[11]  Estelle James,et al.  Averting the Old Age Crisis: Policies to Protect the Old and Promote Growth , 1994 .

[12]  P. Diamond.  Privatization of Social Security: Lessons from Chile , 1993 .

[13]  David C. Lindeman.  Review of Recent Pension Reforms in the Baltic Region , 2004 .

[14]  Kadi Oorn.  Developments in the Estonian Pension System , 2004 .

[15]  Edward R. Whitehouse.  Comparing the New Pension Systems of the Baltic States , 2004 .

[16]  K. Morrow,et al.  EU pension reform - An overview of the debate and an empirical assessment of the main policy reform options , 2002 .

[17]  D. Blanchet,et al.  France: The Difficult Path to Consensual Reforms , 2002 .

[18]  H. Siebert.  Introduction: A European Perspective , 2002 .

[19]  R. Holzmann,et al.  Social Protection Discussion Paper Series Social Risk Management : A New Conceptual Framework for Social Protection and Beyond , 2002 .

[20]  Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on certain legal aspects relating to cinema- , 2002 .

[21]  H. Siebert,et al.  Social Security Pension Reform in Europe , 2002 .

[22]  R. Disney,et al.  Social Protection Discussion Paper Series Notional Accounts as a Pension Reform Strategy : An Evaluation , 1999 .

[23]  Not Available Not Available.  Problems of Providing Income Security in Old Age Cannot be Solved Merely by Changing the Mode of Financing , 2000 .

[24]  F. Pennings,et al.  Social Security and Solidarity in the European Union. Facts, Evaluations, and Perspectives , 2000 .

[25]  J. Dixon.  A Global Ranking of National Social Security Systems , 2000 .

[26]  W. McGillivray.  Pension Reform: Where are we now? , 2000 .

[27]  F. Pennings,et al.  Social Security and Solidarity in the European Union , 2000 .

[28]  Peter R. Orszag,et al.  "Rethinking Pension Reform: Ten Myths About Social Security Systems" , 1999 .

[29]  Emmanuel G. Reynaud.  Pensions in the European Union: Adapting to Economic and Social Changes , 1998 .

[30]  井堀 利宏.  公共経済学 = Public economics , 1998 .

[31]  G. Heinrich.  Pension Reforms in Central and Eastern Europe: Yet Another Transition...? , 1997 .

[32]  N. Barr,et al.  Social security : solution or problem? , 1990 .

[33]  World Bank,et al.  The World Bank Approach to Pension Reform , 2000 .