Using a random displacement model to simulate turbulent particle motion in a baroclinic frontal zone: A new implementation scheme and model performance tests

Numerical artifacts can limit accurate simulation of turbulent particle motion when Lagrangian particle-tracking models are implemented in hydrodynamic models with stratified conditions like fronts. Yet, modeling of individual particle motion in frontal regions is critical for understanding sediment dynamics as well as the transport and retention of planktonic organisms. The objective of this research was to develop a numerical technique to accurately simulate turbulent particle motions in a particletracking model embedded within a hydrodynamic model of a frontal zone. A new interpolation scheme, the ‘water column profile’ scheme, was developed and used to implement a random displacement model for turbulent particle motions. A new interpolation scheme was necessary because linear interpolation schemes caused artificial aggregation of particles where abrupt changes in vertical diffusivity occurred. The new ‘water column profile’ scheme was used to fit a continuous function (a tension spline) to a smoothed profile of vertical diffusivities at the x–y particle location. The new implementation scheme was checked for artifacts and compared with a standard random walk model using (1) Well Mixed Condition tests, and (2) dye-release experiments. The Well Mixed Condition tests confirmed that the use of the ‘water column profile’ interpolation scheme for implementing the random displacement model significantly reduced numerical artifacts. In dye-release experiments, high concentrations of Eulerian tracer and Lagrangian particles were released at the same location up-estuary of the salt front and tracked for 4days. After small differences in initial dispersal rates, tracer and particle distributions remained highly correlated (r=0.84 to 0.99) when a random displacement model was implemented in the particle-tracking model. In contrast, correlation coefficients were substantially lower (r=0.07 to 0.58) when a random walk model was implemented. In general, model performance tests indicated that the ‘water column interpolation’ scheme was an effective technique for implementing a random displacement model within a hydrodynamic model, and both could be used to accurately simulate diffusion in a highly baroclinic frontal region. The new implementation scheme has the potential to be a useful tool for investigating the influence of hydrodynamic variability on the transport of sediment particles and planktonic organisms in frontal zones.

[1]  A. Lehmann,et al.  Modelling the influences of atmospheric forcing conditions on Baltic cod early life stages: distribution and drift , 2003 .

[2]  Robert C. Beardsley,et al.  Flow-induced aggregation of plankton at a front: a 2-D Eulerian model study , 2001 .

[3]  S. Kimura,et al.  Implications of meso-scale eddies caused by frontal disturbances of the Kuroshio Current for anchovy recruitment , 2000 .

[4]  C. Bay.  The Influence of Wind and River Pulses on an Estuarine Turbidity Maximum: Numerical Studies and Field Observations in , 2004 .

[5]  J. Largier,et al.  Demonstration of the onshore transport of larval invertebrates by the shoreward movement of an upwelling front , 2000 .

[6]  S. Uye,et al.  Are tidal fronts good recruitment areas for herbivorous copepods , 1992 .

[7]  J. Schubel,et al.  Turbidity Maximum of the Northern Chesapeake Bay , 1968, Science.

[8]  C. Grimes,et al.  The surface accumulation of larval fishes by hydrodynamic convergence within the Mississippi River plume front , 1992 .

[9]  E. Houde,et al.  Distribution and transport of bay anchovy (Anchoa mitchilli) eggs and larvae in Chesapeake Bay , 2004 .

[10]  Heath,et al.  Bio-physical modelling of the early life stages of haddock, Melanogrammus aeglefinus, in the North Sea , 1998 .

[11]  W. Vincent,et al.  Trophic coupling across the St. Lawrence River estuarine transition zone , 2003 .

[12]  D. Colby,et al.  The spatial distribution of larvalfishes about the Mississippi River plume , 1989 .

[13]  P. Wright,et al.  Distribution of the Early Larval Stages of Cod, Plaice and Lesser Sandeel across Haline Fronts in the North Sea , 2002 .

[14]  Jeffery D. Musiak,et al.  Particle Trapping in Estuarine Tidal Flows , 1994 .

[15]  R. Kostaschuk.  Flow and sediment dynamics in migrating salinity intrusions: Fraser River estuary, Canada , 2002 .

[16]  J. Dauvin.  Relationship between feeding incidence and vertical and longitudinal distribution of rainbow smelt larvae (Osmerus mordax) in a turbid well-mixed estuary , 1990 .

[17]  Albert J. Hermann,et al.  Importance of spawning location and timing to successful transport to nursery areas: a simulation study of Gulf of Alaska walleye pollock , 2001 .

[18]  J. Zeldis,et al.  Aerial observations of surface patchiness of a planktonic crustacean , 1985 .

[19]  J. Manning,et al.  Tidal-front entrainment and retention of fish larvae on the southern flank of Georges Bank , 2001 .

[20]  A. Kuo,et al.  Secondary turbidity maximum in a partially mixed microtidal estuary , 2001 .

[21]  S. Monismith,et al.  Isohaline Position as a Habitat Indicator for Estuarine Populations , 1995 .

[22]  B. MacKenzie,et al.  Larval trophodynamics, turbulence, and drift on Georges Bank: A sensitivity analysis of cod and haddock , 2001 .

[23]  P. Franks,et al.  Phytoplankton patches at fronts : A model of formation and response to wind events , 1997 .

[24]  A. Huyer,et al.  Phytoplankton and photosynthetic light response in the Coastal Transition Zone off northern California in June 1987 , 1991 .

[25]  J. Roughgarden,et al.  Distributions of larval rockfishes Sebastes spp. across nearshore fronts in a coastal upwelling region , 2002 .

[26]  T. Flesch,et al.  Flow Boundaries in Random-Flight Dispersion Models: Enforcing the Well-Mixed Condition , 1993 .

[27]  C. Epifanio.  The Role of Tidal Fronts in Maintaining Patches of Brachyuran Zoeae in Estuarine Waters , 1987 .

[28]  P. Sirois,et al.  Influence of turbidity, food density and parasites on the ingestion and growth of larval rainbow smelt Osmerus mordax in an estuarine turbidity maximum. , 2000 .

[29]  John L. Largier,et al.  Estuarine fronts: How important are they? , 1993 .

[30]  Peter C. Smith,et al.  Lagrangian Stochastic Modeling in Coastal Oceanography , 2002 .

[31]  J. Salomon,et al.  Effects of tides on mixing and suspended sediment transport in macrotidal estuaries , 1980 .

[32]  J. Kappenberg,et al.  Variability of the mixing zones and estuarine turbidity maxima in the Elbe and Weser estuaries , 2001 .

[33]  E. Houde,et al.  Retention of white perch and striped bass larvae: Biological-physical interactions in Chesapeake Bay estuarine turbidity maximum , 2001 .

[34]  G. Mellor,et al.  A Hierarchy of Turbulence Closure Models for Planetary Boundary Layers. , 1974 .

[35]  W. Kimmerer,et al.  Plasticity in vertical migration by native and exotic estuarine fishes in a dynamic low‐salinity zone , 2002 .

[36]  Werner,et al.  Larval transport during winter in the SABRE study area: results of a coupled vertical larval behaviour–three‐dimensional circulation model , 1999 .

[37]  W. Hamner,et al.  Topographically Controlled Fronts in the Ocean and Their Biological Influence , 1988, Science.

[38]  D. Mackas,et al.  Aggregation of the copepod Neocalanus plumchrus at the margin of the fraser river plume in the strait Georgia , 1988 .

[39]  E. Houde,et al.  Modeling particles and pelagic organisms in Chesapeake Bay: Convergent features control plankton distributions , 1999 .

[40]  André W. Visser,et al.  Using random walk models to simulate the vertical distribution of particles in a turbulent water column , 1997 .

[41]  F. Werner,et al.  Upper-ocean transport mechanisms from the Gulf of Maine to Georges Bank, with implications for Calanus supply , 1997 .

[42]  I. Suthers,et al.  The influence of tidal phase on patterns of ichthyoplankton abundance in the vicinity of an estuarine front, Botany Bay, Australia , 1996 .

[43]  Lawrence P. Sanford,et al.  Reconsidering the physics of the Chesapeake Bay estuarine turbidity maximum , 2001 .

[44]  Francisco E. Werner,et al.  Trophodynamic and advective influences on Georges Bank larval cod and haddock , 1996 .

[45]  C. McGilliard,et al.  Seasonal and annual variability in the spatial patterns of plankton biomass in Chesapeake Bay , 2005 .

[46]  Y. Iwatsuki,et al.  Distribution and Food Availability of Fish Larvae in the Vicinity of a Thermohaline Front at the Entrance of Ise Bay. , 1998 .

[47]  N. Heaps,et al.  Three-dimensional coastal ocean models , 1987 .

[48]  M. Stacey,et al.  Results from the hydrodynamic element of the 1994 entrapment zone study in Suisun Bay , 1998 .

[49]  Stephen G. Monismith,et al.  Observations of Turbulence in a Partially Stratified Estuary , 1999 .

[50]  J. Woodruff,et al.  Sediment transport and trapping in the Hudson River estuary , 2001 .

[51]  Julian J. Dodson,et al.  Abundance of larval rainbow smelt (Osmerus mordax) in relation to the maximum turbidity zone and associated macroplanktonic fauna of the middle St. Lawrence estuary , 1989 .

[52]  R. Uncles,et al.  The freshwater-saltwater interface and its relationship to the turbidity maximum in the Tamar Estuary, United Kingdom , 1993 .

[53]  S. Chao,et al.  The influence of wind and river pulses on an estuarine turbidity maximum: Numerical studies and field observations in Chesapeake Bay , 2004 .

[54]  D. Danielssen,et al.  Variability in frontal zone formation and distribution of gadoid fish larvae at the shelf break in the northeastern North Sea , 1999 .

[55]  S. Coombs,et al.  An individual-based growth and transport model of the early life-history stages of mackerel (Scomber scombrus) in the eastern North Atlantic , 2001 .

[56]  J. J. Govoni.  Flux of larval fishes across frontal boundaries: examples from the Mississippi River plume front and the western Gulf Stream front in winter : Larval fish assemblages and oceanic boundaries , 1993 .

[57]  G. Mellor.  USERS GUIDE for A THREE-DIMENSIONAL, PRIMITIVE EQUATION, NUMERICAL OCEAN MODEL , 1998 .

[58]  D. A. Brooks,et al.  Simulating larval supply to estuarine nursery areas: how important are physical processes to the supply of larvae to the Aransas Pass Inlet? , 2004 .

[59]  E. Houde,et al.  Linking ETM physics, zooplankton prey, and fish early-life histories to striped bass Morone saxatilis and white perch M. americana recruitment , 2003 .