Radiation exposure to medical staff in interventional and cardiac radiology.

The aim of this work has been to determine typical occupational dose levels in interventional radiology and cardiology installations and to relate doses to patient and occupational dosimetry through the dose-area product. An experimental correlation between environmental dosimetric records and dose-area products in the centres studied was established. The study covered a sample of 83 procedures performed by 10 specialists in six laboratories. The radiologists and cardiologists monitored wore nine thermoluminescent chips next to eyes, forehead, neck, hands, left shoulder, left forearm and left arm during each single procedure. In addition, direct reading electronic devices for environmental dosimetry were placed in the C-arm of the X-ray system, to estimate roughly the occupational radiation risk level. Typical shoulder doses derived from electronic dosimetry range between 300 and 500 muSv per procedure, assuming no lead protective screens were used. Using these values and patient dose-area data from two laboratories, averaged ratios of 84 and 120 muSv per 1000 cGy cm2 are obtained for cardiology procedures. Finally, occupational dose reductions of approximately 20% when using highly filtered X-ray beams with automatic tube potential (kV) reduction (available in some facilities), and by a factor of about three when using ceiling mounted screens, have been found.

[1]  K. Faulkner,et al.  The dependence of the scattered radiation dose to personnel on technique factors in diagnostic radiology. , 1992, The British journal of radiology.

[2]  J. I. Ten,et al.  Patient dosimetry in interventional radiology using slow films. , 1997, The British journal of radiology.

[3]  J R Williams,et al.  The interdependence of staff and patient doses in interventional radiology. , 1997, The British journal of radiology.

[4]  J. Benson.  Patient and physician radiation exposure during fluoroscopy. , 1992, Radiology.

[5]  A. Shaw,et al.  Factors affecting the radiation dose to the lens of the eye during cardiac catheterization procedures. , 1993, The British journal of radiology.

[6]  H. Chan,et al.  Interventional radiologists: occupational radiation doses and risks. , 1993, Radiology.

[7]  J. Boone,et al.  Radiation exposure to angiographers under different fluoroscopic imaging conditions. , 1991, Radiology.

[8]  An assessment of the radiation dose received by staff using fluoroscopic equipment. , 1982, The British journal of radiology.

[9]  R. Coulden,et al.  Coronary angiography: an analysis of radiographic practice in the UK. , 1993, The British journal of radiology.

[10]  J. Roelandt,et al.  Reduction of radiation exposure while maintaining high-quality fluoroscopic images during interventional cardiology using novel x-ray tube technology with extra beam filtering. , 1994, Circulation.

[11]  B. McParland,et al.  A survey of the radiation exposures received by the staff at two cardiac catheterization laboratories. , 1990, The British journal of radiology.

[12]  P. Bourland,et al.  Radiation exposure during cardiology fellowship training. , 1997, Health physics.

[13]  K. Faulkner,et al.  Patient and staff dosimetry in neuroradiological procedures. , 1995, The British journal of radiology.

[14]  J. Karppinen,et al.  Radiation Risk and Exposure of Radiologists and Patients during Coronary Angiography and Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty (PTCA) , 1995 .

[15]  T. Kusama,et al.  Occupational exposure in pediatric cardiac catheterization. , 1995, Health physics.

[16]  M. McKetty,et al.  Study of radiation doses to personnel in a cardiac catheterization laboratory. , 1996, Health physics.

[17]  K. Faulkner,et al.  Estimation of effective dose equivalent to staff in diagnostic radiology. , 1988, Physics in medicine and biology.

[18]  F. Rueter.  Physician and Patient Exposure During Cardiac Catheterization , 1978, Circulation.