A narrative review of recent tools and innovations toward automating living systematic reviews and evidence syntheses.

[1]  J. Meerpohl,et al.  From standard systematic reviews to living systematic reviews , 2023, Zeitschrift für Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualität im Gesundheitswesen.

[2]  I. Cree,et al.  Machine learning computational tools to assist the performance of systematic reviews: A mapping review , 2022, BMC medical research methodology.

[3]  Jiarui Wu,et al.  Past, present and future of living systematic review: a bibliometrics analysis , 2022, BMJ Global Health.

[4]  Byron C. Wallace,et al.  In a pilot study, automated real-time systematic review updates were feasible, accurate, and work-saving. , 2022, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[5]  A. Muller,et al.  Automating risk of bias assessment in systematic reviews: a real-time mixed methods comparison of human researchers to a machine learning system , 2022, BMC Medical Research Methodology.

[6]  K. Pelch,et al.  Invited Perspective: The Promise of Fit-for-Purpose Systematic Evidence Maps for Supporting Regulatory Health Assessment , 2022, Environmental health perspectives.

[7]  Neal R Haddaway,et al.  Tailored PRISMA 2020 flow diagrams for living systematic reviews: a methodological survey and a proposal , 2022, F1000Research.

[8]  P. Cimiano,et al.  CTrO-Editor: A Web-based Tool to Capture Clinical Trial Data for Aggregation and Pooling , 2021, K-CAP.

[9]  P. Glasziou,et al.  Systematic review automation tools improve efficiency but lack of knowledge impedes their adoption: a survey. , 2021, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[10]  D. Gunnell,et al.  The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on self-harm and suicidal behaviour: update of living systematic review , 2021, F1000Research.

[11]  Lena Schmidt,et al.  Data extraction methods for systematic review (semi)automation: A living systematic review , 2021, F1000Research.

[12]  L. Gerald,et al.  Updating search strategies for literature reviews with OUR2D2: an open-source computer application , 2021, Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA.

[13]  E. Mayo-Wilson,et al.  The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews , 2021, PLoS medicine.

[14]  S. McKeown,et al.  Considerations for conducting systematic reviews: evaluating the performance of different methods for de-duplicating references , 2021, Systematic Reviews.

[15]  I. Boutron,et al.  Changes in evidence for studies assessing interventions for COVID-19 reported in preprints: meta-research study , 2020, BMC Medicine.

[16]  L. McGuinness,et al.  A descriptive analysis of the data availability statements accompanying medRxiv preprints and a comparison with their published counterparts , 2020, PloS one.

[17]  Ani Nenkova,et al.  Trialstreamer: Mapping and Browsing Medical Evidence in Real-Time , 2020, ACL.

[18]  Byron C. Wallace,et al.  Trialstreamer: A living, automatically updated database of clinical trial reports , 2020, medRxiv.

[19]  Brian E. Howard,et al.  SWIFT-Active Screener: Accelerated document screening through active learning and integrated recall estimation , 2020, Environment international.

[20]  Isla Kuhn,et al.  Software tools to support title and abstract screening for systematic reviews in healthcare: an evaluation , 2020, BMC Medical Research Methodology.

[21]  David Brown.  A Review of the PubMed PICO Tool: Using Evidence-Based Practice in Health Education , 2019, Health promotion practice.

[22]  Joshua E. Richardson,et al.  20 Achieving evidence interoperability in the computer age: setting evidence on FHIR , 2019, Oral Presentations.

[23]  Guy Tsafnat,et al.  Still moving toward automation of the systematic review process: a summary of discussions at the third meeting of the International Collaboration for Automation of Systematic Reviews (ICASR) , 2019, Systematic Reviews.

[24]  Karin M. Verspoor,et al.  Crowdsourcing critical appraisal of research evidence (CrowdCARE) was found to be a valid approach to assessing clinical research quality. , 2018, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[25]  Travis R. Goodwin,et al.  Automatically Linking Registered Clinical Trials to their Published Results with Deep Highway Networks , 2018, AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science.

[26]  Byron C. Wallace,et al.  Living systematic reviews: 2. Combining human and machine effort. , 2017, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[27]  E. Akl,et al.  Living systematic review: 1. Introduction-the why, what, when, and how. , 2017, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[28]  Adam G. Dunn,et al.  A systematic review of the processes used to link clinical trial registrations to their published results , 2017, Systematic Reviews.

[29]  G. Guyatt,et al.  When and how to update systematic reviews: consensus and checklist , 2016, British Medical Journal.

[30]  Brian E. Howard,et al.  SWIFT-Review: a text-mining workbench for systematic review , 2016, Systematic Reviews.

[31]  Hossam M. Hammady,et al.  Learning to identify relevant studies for systematic reviews using random forest and external information , 2016, Machine Learning.

[32]  Julian PT Higgins,et al.  Machine learning to assist risk-of-bias assessments in systematic reviews , 2015, International journal of epidemiology.

[33]  Byron C. Wallace,et al.  RobotReviewer: evaluation of a system for automatically assessing bias in clinical trials , 2015, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[34]  S. Ananiadou,et al.  Using text mining for study identification in systematic reviews: a systematic review of current approaches , 2015, Systematic Reviews.

[35]  Paul Glasziou,et al.  Better duplicate detection for systematic reviewers: evaluation of Systematic Review Assistant-Deduplication Module , 2015, Systematic Reviews.

[36]  Sally Hopewell,et al.  A multicomponent decision tool for prioritising the updating of systematic reviews , 2013, BMJ.

[37]  Clive E Adams,et al.  Systematic reviews: Work that needs to be done and not to be done , 2013, Journal of evidence-based medicine.

[38]  Aaron M. Cohen,et al.  Research Paper: Cross-Topic Learning for Work Prioritization in Systematic Review Creation and Update , 2009, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[39]  OUP accepted manuscript , 2021, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association.

[40]  V. Torra,et al.  Editorial , 2007, J. Adv. Comput. Intell. Intell. Informatics.