Flow-Diversion Panacea or Poison?

Endovascular therapy is now the treatment of choice for intracranial aneurysms (IAs) for its efficacy and safety profile. The use of flow diversion (FD) has recently expanded to cover many types of IAs in various locations. Some institutions even attempt FD as first line treatment for unruptured IAs. The most widely used devices are the pipeline embolization device (PED), the SILK flow diverter (SFD), the flow redirection endoluminal device (FRED), and Surpass. Many questions were raised regarding the long-term complications, the optimal regimen of dual antiplatelet therapy, and the durability of treatment effect. We reviewed the literature to address these questions as well as other concerns on FD when treating IAs.

[1]  J. Słowiński,et al.  Expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in rat brain after subarachnoid haemorrhage and endothelin receptor blockage with BQ-123. , 2001, Folia neuropathologica.

[2]  K. Fargen,et al.  Review of reported complications associated with the Pipeline Embolization Device. , 2012, World neurosurgery.

[3]  O. Diaz,et al.  Treatment of 14 intracranial aneurysms with the FRED system , 2013, Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery.

[4]  S. Renowden,et al.  Intra-Aneurysmal Thrombosis as a Possible Cause of Delayed Aneurysm Rupture after Flow-Diversion Treatment , 2010, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[5]  Z Kulcsar,et al.  Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms by Functional Reconstruction of the Parent Artery: The Budapest Experience with the Pipeline Embolization Device , 2010, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[6]  T. Becske,et al.  Stent-Supported Aneurysm Coiling: A Literature Survey of Treatment and Follow-Up , 2012, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[7]  S. Gabriel,et al.  Systematic Review of the Literature , 2021, Adherence to Antiretroviral Therapy among Perinatal Women in Guyana.

[8]  I. Saatci,et al.  Cerecyte Coil Trial: Procedural Safety and Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Ruptured and Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms , 2012, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[9]  K. Frerichs,et al.  Stent usage in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: past, present and future , 2012, Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry.

[10]  Intracranial aneurysm coiling with PGLA-coated coils versus bare platinum coils: long-term anatomic follow-up , 2012, Neuroradiology.

[11]  D. Lopes,et al.  Progressive Deconstruction: A Novel Aneurysm Treatment Using the Pipeline Embolization Device for Competitive Flow Diversion Case Report , 2014, Neurosurgery.

[12]  Liliana Cesar,et al.  An Original Flow Diversion Device for the Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms: Evaluation in the Rabbit Elastase-Induced Model , 2009, Stroke.

[13]  G. Gould,et al.  Spontaneous Delayed Migration/Shortening of the Pipeline Embolization Device: Report of 5 Cases , 2013, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[14]  T. Becske,et al.  Safety and Efficacy of Adjunctive Balloon Remodeling during Endovascular Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms: A Literature Review , 2008, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[15]  P. Lylyk,et al.  The Pipeline Embolization Device for the Intracranial Treatment of Aneurysms Trial , 2010, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[16]  A. V. van Norden,et al.  New Generation of Flow Diverter (Surpass) for Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms: A Prospective Single-Center Study in 37 Patients , 2013, Stroke.

[17]  S. Tjoumakaris,et al.  Treatment of large and giant intracranial aneurysms: cost comparison of flow diversion and traditional embolization strategies. , 2014, World neurosurgery.

[18]  Adnan H Siddiqui,et al.  Panacea or problem: flow diverters in the treatment of symptomatic large or giant fusiform vertebrobasilar aneurysms. , 2012, Journal of neurosurgery.

[19]  G. Leung,et al.  Pipeline Embolization Device for Intracranial Aneurysm: A Systematic Review , 2012, Clinical Neuroradiology.

[20]  J. Pruvo,et al.  Flow-Diverter Stent for the Endovascular Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms: A Prospective Study in 29 Patients With 34 Aneurysms , 2010, Stroke.

[21]  Fumihito Arai,et al.  The study of flow diversion effects on aneurysm using multiple enterprise stents and two flow diverters , 2012, Asian journal of neurosurgery.

[22]  R. Rosenwasser,et al.  The pipeline embolization device: what have we learned? , 2013, World neurosurgery.

[23]  J. Wardlaw,et al.  Hydrogel-coated coils versus bare platinum coils for the endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms (HELPS): a randomised controlled trial , 2011, The Lancet.

[24]  T. Krings,et al.  The Many Faces of Intracranial Arterial Dissections , 2010, Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences.

[25]  David F. Kallmes,et al.  Endovascular Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms With Flow Diverters: A Meta-Analysis , 2013, Stroke.

[26]  E. Boccardi,et al.  Midterm and long-term follow-up of cerebral aneurysms treated with flow diverter devices: a single-center experience. , 2013, Journal of neurosurgery.

[27]  Carlos Miranda,et al.  CURATIVE ENDOVASCULAR RECONSTRUCTION OF CEREBRAL ANEURYSMS WITH THE PIPELINE EMBOLIZATION DEVICE: THE BUENOS AIRES EXPERIENCE , 2009, Neurosurgery.

[28]  S. Tjoumakaris,et al.  Comparison of Flow Diversion and Coiling in Large Unruptured Intracranial Saccular Aneurysms , 2013, Stroke.

[29]  R. Blanc,et al.  Flow Diverters at and Beyond the Level of the Circle of Willis for the Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms , 2012, Stroke.

[30]  N. Kocer,et al.  Early and midterm results of complex cerebral aneurysms treated with Silk stent , 2012, Neuroradiology.

[31]  K. Bulsara,et al.  Flow diverters and a tale of two aneurysms , 2012, Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery.

[32]  L. Pierot,et al.  Immediate Clinical Outcome of Patients Harboring Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms Treated by Endovascular Approach: Results of the ATENA Study , 2008, Stroke.

[33]  I. Saatci,et al.  Endovascular Treatment of Middle Cerebral Artery Aneurysms with Flow Modification with the Use of the Pipeline Embolization Device , 2014, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[34]  Ruth E. Anderson,et al.  Pre-procedure P2Y12 reaction units value predicts perioperative thromboembolic and hemorrhagic complications in patients with cerebral aneurysms treated with the Pipeline Embolization Device , 2013, Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery.

[35]  S. Tjoumakaris,et al.  Single center experience with pipeline stent: feasibility, technique, and complications. , 2012, Neurosurgery.

[36]  Jacqueline Birks,et al.  Early Experience in the Treatment of Intra-Cranial Aneurysms by Endovascular Flow Diversion: A Multicentre Prospective Study , 2010, PloS one.

[37]  O. Naggara,et al.  Endovascular treatment of intracranial unruptured aneurysms: systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature on safety and efficacy. , 2010, Radiology.

[38]  Dhananjay Ghongade,et al.  Neuroradiology , 2007, Indian Journal of Radiology and Imaging.

[39]  B. Romner,et al.  Treatment of intracranial aneurysms. Reconstruction of the parent artery with flow-diverting (Silk) stent , 2012, Neuroradiology.

[40]  James V. Byrne,et al.  Flow Diverters in the Management of Intracranial Aneurysms: A Review , 2012 .

[41]  D. Solari,et al.  Italian multicenter experience with flow-diverter devices for intracranial unruptured aneurysm treatment with periprocedural complications—a retrospective data analysis , 2012, Neuroradiology.

[42]  Hashem Shaltoni,et al.  Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Monitoring for Neurointerventional Procedures Using a Point-of-Care Platelet Function Test: A Single-Center Experience , 2008, American Journal of Neuroradiology.