Contemporary management of civilian penetrating cervicothoracic arterial injuries

BACKGROUND The management of arterial injury at the thoracic outlet has long hinged on the fundamental principles of extensile exposure and vascular anastomosis. Nonetheless, treatment options for such injuries have evolved to include both endovascular stent placement and temporary vascular shunts. The purpose of this study was to evaluate our recent experience with penetrating cervicothoracic arterial injuries in light of these developments in trauma care. METHODS Patients with penetrating injuries to the innominate, carotid, subclavian, or axillary arteries managed at a single civilian trauma center between 2000 and 2013 were categorized as the modern era (ME) cohort. The management strategies and outcomes pertaining to the ME group were compared to those of previously reported experience (PE) concerning injuries to the innominate, carotid, subclavian, or axillary arteries at the same institution from 1974 to 1988. RESULTS Over the two eras, there were 202 patients: 110 in the ME group and 92 in the PE group. Most of the injuries in both groups were managed with primary repair (45% vs. 46%; p = 0.89). A similar proportion of injuries in each group was managed with anticoagulation alone (14% vs. 10%; p = 0.40). In the ME group, two cases were managed with temporary shunt placement, and endovascular stent placement was performed in 12 patients. Outcomes were similar between the groups (bivariate comparison): mortality (ME, 15% vs. PE, 14%; p = 0.76), amputation following subclavian or axillary artery injury (ME, 5% vs. PE, 4%; p = 0.58), and posttreatment stroke following carotid injury (ME, 2% vs. PE, 6%; p = 0.57). CONCLUSIONS Experience with penetrating arterial cervicothoracic injuries at a high-volume urban trauma center remained remarkably similar with respect to both anatomic distribution of injury and treatment. Conventional operative exposure and repair remain the cornerstone of treatment for most civilian cervicothoracic arterial injuries. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic study, level V.

[1]  N. Fox,et al.  General Guideline Title Bibliographic Source(s) Guideline Status Recommendations Major Recommendations , 2022 .

[2]  B. Beynnon,et al.  Long-term clinical outcomes, motion, strength, and function after total claviculectomy. , 2014, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[3]  T. Rasmussen,et al.  Endovascular management of axillo-subclavian arterial injury: a review of published experience. , 2012, Injury.

[4]  K. Mattox,et al.  Overcoming challenges of endovascular treatment of complex subclavian and axillary artery injuries in hypotensive patients , 2012, The journal of trauma and acute care surgery.

[5]  C. Fox,et al.  Update on wartime vascular injury. , 2011, Perspectives in vascular surgery and endovascular therapy.

[6]  N. Rich,et al.  History of temporary intravascular shunts in the management of vascular injury. , 2010, Journal of vascular surgery.

[7]  M. Galarneau,et al.  The use of temporary vascular shunts in military extremity wounds: a preliminary outcome analysis with 2-year follow-up. , 2010, The Journal of trauma.

[8]  D. Feliciano,et al.  Damage control techniques for common and external iliac artery injuries: have temporary intravascular shunts replaced the need for ligation? , 2010, The Journal of trauma.

[9]  A. Nicol,et al.  An analysis of 50 surgically managed penetrating subclavian artery injuries. , 2010, European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery.

[10]  J. Michalek,et al.  From the Southern Association for Vascular Surgery Effect of temporary shunting on extremity vascular injury : An outcome analysis from the Global War on Terror vascular injury initiative , 2022 .

[11]  D. Feliciano,et al.  A decade's experience with temporary intravascular shunts at a civilian level I trauma center. , 2008, The Journal of trauma.

[12]  B. Warren,et al.  Long-term results of stent graft treatment of subclavian artery injuries: management of choice for stable patients? , 2008, Journal of vascular surgery.

[13]  R. Karmy-Jones,et al.  Operative repair or endovascular stent graft in blunt traumatic thoracic aortic injuries: results of an American Association for the Surgery of Trauma Multicenter Study. , 2008, The Journal of trauma.

[14]  Todd E Rasmussen,et al.  In-theater management of vascular injury: 2 years of the Balad Vascular Registry. , 2007, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[15]  Michael A. Peck,et al.  The use of temporary vascular shunts as a damage control adjunct in the management of wartime vascular injury. , 2006, The Journal of trauma.

[16]  J. W. Pate,et al.  Cervicothoracic arterial injuries: Recommendations for diagnosis and management , 2005, World Journal of Surgery.

[17]  J. Holcomb,et al.  Fractures with major vascular injuries from gunshot wounds: implications of surgical sequence. , 2002, The Journal of trauma.

[18]  G. Velmahos,et al.  Penetrating injuries to the subclavian and axillary vessels. , 1999, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[19]  J. Hunt,et al.  Treatment of femur fracture with associated vascular injury. , 1996, The Journal of trauma.

[20]  K. Srivastava,et al.  Anatomical and functional considerations in total claviclectomy. , 1976, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[21]  G. T. Shires,et al.  Management of major vascular injuries in the base of the neck. An 11-year experience with 146 cases. , 1973, Archives of surgery.

[22]  T. K. Hunt,et al.  Vascular injuries of the base of the neck. , 1969, Archives of surgery.