Context-Based Situation Recognition in Computer Vision Systems

The availability of visual sensors and the increment of their processing capabilities have led to the development of a new generation of multi-camera systems. This increment has also conveyed new expectations and requirements that cannot be fulfilled by applying traditional fusion techniques. The ultimate objective of computer vision systems is to obtain a description of the observed scenario in terms that are both computable and human-readable, which can be seen as a specific form of situation assessment. Particularly, there is a great interest in human activity recognition in several areas such as surveillance and ambient intelligence. Simple activities can be recognized by applying pattern recognition algorithms on sensor data. However, identification of complex activities requires the development of cognitive capabilities close to human understanding. Several recent proposals combine numerical techniques and a symbolic model that represents context-dependent, background and common-sense knowledge relevant to the task. In this chapter the current challenges in the development of vision-based activity recognition systems are described, and how they can be tackled by exploiting formally represented context knowledge. Along with a review of the related literature, we describe an approach with examples in the areas of ambient intelligence and indoor security. The chapter surveys methods for context management in the literature that use symbolic knowledge models to represent and reason with context. Due to their relevance, we will pay special attention to ontology and logic-based models.

[1]  John McCarthy,et al.  Notes on Formalizing Context , 1993, IJCAI.

[2]  Miguel A. Patricio,et al.  Applying the Dynamic Region Connection Calculus to exploit geographic knowledge in maritime surveillance , 2012, 2012 15th International Conference on Information Fusion.

[3]  Miguel A. Patricio,et al.  Context-based scene recognition from visual data in smart homes: an Information Fusion approach , 2012, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[4]  Miguel A. Patricio,et al.  DISCRETE OPTIMIZATION ALGORITHMS IN REAL-TIME VISUAL TRACKING , 2009, Appl. Artif. Intell..

[5]  Gian Luca Foresti,et al.  Special issue on video communications, processing, and understanding for third generation surveillance systems , 2001 .

[6]  Sergio A. Velastin,et al.  Intelligent distributed surveillance systems: a review , 2005 .

[7]  Tobias Bjerregaard,et al.  A survey of research and practices of Network-on-chip , 2006, CSUR.

[8]  Karen Henricksen,et al.  A framework for context-aware pervasive computing applications , 2003 .

[9]  Miguel A. Patricio,et al.  Ontology-based context representation and reasoning for object tracking and scene interpretation in video , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..

[10]  Alan N. Steinberg,et al.  Situation and context in data fusion and natural language understanding , 2008, 2008 11th International Conference on Information Fusion.

[11]  Miguel A. Patricio,et al.  A practical approach for active camera coordination based on a fusion-driven multi-agent system , 2014, Int. J. Syst. Sci..

[12]  Miguel A. Patricio,et al.  Topological properties in ontology-based applications , 2011, 2011 11th International Conference on Intelligent Systems Design and Applications.

[13]  Stuart C. Shapiro,et al.  A Categorization of Contextual Constraints , 2008, AAAI Fall Symposium: Biologically Inspired Cognitive Architectures.

[14]  David S. Doermann,et al.  Tools and techniques for video performance evaluation , 2000, Proceedings 15th International Conference on Pattern Recognition. ICPR-2000.

[15]  Mieczyslaw M. Kokar,et al.  Ontology-based situation awareness , 2009, Inf. Fusion.

[16]  Mieczyslaw M. Kokar,et al.  SAWA: an assistant for higher-level fusion and situation awareness , 2005, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[17]  Yll Haxhimusa,et al.  Representations for Cognitive Vision:A Review of Appearance-Based, Spatio-Temporal, and Graph-Based Approaches , 2008 .

[18]  Miguel A. Patricio,et al.  Fuzzy region assignment for visual tracking , 2011, Soft Comput..

[19]  Jadwiga Indulska,et al.  A software engineering framework for context-aware pervasive computing , 2004, Second IEEE Annual Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications, 2004. Proceedings of the.

[20]  José M. Molina López,et al.  Context-based multi-level information fusion for harbor surveillance , 2015, Inf. Fusion.

[21]  Reza Olfati-Saber,et al.  Distributed Kalman filtering for sensor networks , 2007, 2007 46th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[22]  Peter F. Patel-Schneider,et al.  Reducing OWL entailment to description logic satisfiability , 2004, Journal of Web Semantics.

[23]  Volker Haarslev,et al.  The RacerPro knowledge representation and reasoning system , 2012, Semantic Web.

[24]  Bernd Neumann,et al.  On scene interpretation with description logics , 2006, Image Vis. Comput..

[25]  Miguel A. Patricio,et al.  Communication in distributed tracking systems: an ontology‐based approach to improve cooperation , 2011, Expert Syst. J. Knowl. Eng..

[26]  Lauro Snidaro,et al.  Fusing uncertain knowledge and evidence for maritime situational awareness via Markov Logic Networks , 2015, Inf. Fusion.

[27]  Mark D. Dunlop,et al.  Toward a Multidisciplinary Model of Context to Support Context-Aware Computing , 2005, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[28]  Chee-Yee Chong,et al.  Joint Probabilistic Data Association in Distributed Sensor Networks , 1985, 1985 American Control Conference.

[29]  Miguel A. Patricio,et al.  High-Level Information Fusion in Visual Sensor Networks , 2012 .

[30]  Ulrike Sattler,et al.  A Case for Abductive Reasoning over Ontologies , 2006, OWLED.

[31]  Miguel A. Patricio,et al.  Boosting video tracking performance by means of Tabu Search in intelligent visual surveillance systems , 2011, J. Heuristics.

[32]  Claudia Linnhoff-Popien,et al.  A Context Modeling Survey , 2004 .

[33]  Miguel A. Patricio,et al.  Ontological Representation of Light Wave Camera Data to Support Vision-Based AmI , 2012, Sensors.

[34]  Miguel A. Patricio,et al.  Strategies and techniques for use and exploitation of Contextual Information in high-level fusion architectures , 2010, 2010 13th International Conference on Information Fusion.

[35]  Boris Motik,et al.  Query Answering for OWL-DL with Rules , 2004, SEMWEB.

[36]  Miguel A. Patricio,et al.  Distributed Data and Information Fusion in Visual Sensor Networks , 2012 .

[37]  Paulo Cesar G. da Costa,et al.  PR-OWL 2.0 - Bridging the gap to OWL semantics , 2010, URSW.

[38]  Jesús García,et al.  Context-based Information Fusion: A survey and discussion , 2015, Inf. Fusion.