Experiences and expectations with CASE technology - An example from Slovenia

[1]  Joze Zupancic,et al.  Key issues in information systems management: A Delphi study in Slovenia , 1996, Inf. Manag..

[2]  J.J.M. Trienekens,et al.  An empirical evaluation of the use of CASE tools , 1993, Proceedings of 6th International Workshop on Computer-Aided Software Engineering.

[3]  E. Lindholm.  Two computers in one , 1993 .

[4]  D. Glass,et al.  Post-implementation management of CASE methodology , 1993 .

[5]  R.J. Freeman.  An empirical study of the linkage of CASE, function points, and systems development , 1992, [1992] Proceedings of the Fifth International Workshop on Computer-Aided Software Engineering.

[6]  Carsten Sørensen,et al.  A Tale of Two Countries: Case Experiences and Expectations , 1992, The Impact of Computer Supported Technologies in Information Systems Development.

[7]  James A. Senn,et al.  Case implementation: the importance of multiple perspectives , 1992, SIGCPR '92.

[8]  Clifford C. Huff,et al.  Elements of a realistic CASE tool adoption budget , 1992, CACM.

[9]  P. Smith,et al.  Use, problems, benefits and future direction of computer-aided software engineering in United Kingdom , 1991 .

[10]  Richard T. Watson,et al.  Key issues in information systems management: An international perspective , 1991, Inf. Manag..

[11]  John Parkinson.  Making CASE Work , 1990, CAiSE.

[12]  Houston H. Carr,et al.  Implementing a Corporatewide Information Strategy Through CASE , 1990 .

[13]  Carol Zagorsky.  Case Study: Managing the Change to CASE , 1990 .

[14]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  CASE productivity perceptions of software engineering professionals , 1989, CACM.

[15]  R. J. Norman,et al.  CASE technology transfer: a case study of unsuccessful change , 1989 .

[16]  D. L. Burkhard,et al.  Implementing case tools , 1989 .

[17]  Carl L. Gordon,et al.  Systems Analysis and Design: Current Practices , 1987, MIS Q..