A Composite Indicator for University Quality Assesment: The Case of Spanish Higher Education System

This study presents a synthetic indicator for quality assessment in the Spanish public university system. The indicator is based on a series of components and simple indicators that were obtained from the public universities’ financial planning estimates. The paper takes a quantitative, wide-ranging approach to analyse the quality of university institutions and is intended to be complimentary to other qualitative approaches. Data Envelopment Analysis was used in order to facilitate the aggregation and weighting of the data used to construct the synthetic indicator. This technique allows the analyst to endogenously determine the weighting of the partial indicators while respecting the peculiarities intrinsic to each university. The results reveal that there are significant differences among Spanish public universities. In addition to how relatively well each of the institutions performs, other factors would seem to be influencing the results; essentially these are related to socio-economic factors and to the application of university policy in Spain over recent decades.

[1]  Teg Alam Application of Mathematical Programming , 2001 .

[2]  Mike McDonald,et al.  The socio-economic impacts assessment of advanced convoy driving on motorway , 2003 .

[3]  P. Murias,et al.  An Economic Wellbeing Index for the Spanish Provinces: A Data Envelopment Analysis Approach , 2006 .

[4]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 1978 .

[5]  Sara Fernández López Modelos de financiación de la educación superior, una aplicación al sistema universitario gallego , 2001 .

[6]  Michael Obersteiner,et al.  Remeasuring the HDI by Data Envelopement Analysis , 2001 .

[7]  Gareth Williams,et al.  The market route to mass higher education: British experience 1979–1996 , 1997 .

[8]  Antreas D. Athanassopoulos,et al.  Assessing the Comparative Efficiency of Higher Education Institutions in the UK by the Means of Data Envelopment Analysis , 1997 .

[9]  I. A. Muñoz,et al.  Funciones de la Universidad , 2002 .

[10]  Akihiro Hashimoto,et al.  Has Livability of Japan Gotten Better for 1956–1990?: a Dea Approach , 1997 .

[11]  Gary Madden,et al.  Measuring Public Sector Efficiency: A Study of Economics Departments at Australian Universities , 1997 .

[12]  Joe Zhu,et al.  Multidimensional quality-of-life measure with an application to Fortune's best cities , 2001 .

[13]  A. Sen On Economic Inequality , 1974 .

[14]  F. Førsund,et al.  On the Origins of Data Envelopment Analysis , 2000 .

[15]  Bernard Kingston,et al.  The Times Good University Guide 2007 , 2006 .

[16]  C. A. Knox Lovell,et al.  Stratified Models of Education Production Using Modified DEA and Regression Analysis , 1994 .

[17]  C. Lovell,et al.  One Market, One Number? A Composite Indicator Assessment of EU Internal Market Dynamics , 2005 .

[18]  Joshua K.H. Mok,et al.  Marketisation and the Changing Governance in Higher Education: A Comparative Study , 2002 .

[19]  Graeme C. Moodie Standards and criteria in higher education , 1987 .

[20]  A. Charnes,et al.  Data Envelopment Analysis Theory, Methodology and Applications , 1995 .

[21]  Sylvia M. Brown A systemic perspective on higher education in the United Kingdom , 1999 .

[22]  Haksever Cengiz,et al.  Measuring Value in MBA Programmes , 1998 .

[23]  Cláudia S. Sarrico,et al.  Data envelopment analysis and university selection , 1997 .

[24]  Dimitris K. Despotis,et al.  A reassessment of the human development index via data envelopment analysis , 2005, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[25]  L. Cherchye,et al.  Legitimately Diverse, Yet Comparable: On Synthesizing Social Inclusion Performance in the EU , 2004 .

[26]  John Ruggiero,et al.  On the measurement of technical efficiency in the public sector , 1996 .

[27]  A. Hashimoto,et al.  Using DEA to evaluate the state of society as measured by multiple social indicators , 1993 .

[28]  Ramón Pérez Juste,et al.  La calidad de la educación , 2000 .

[29]  Joe Zhu,et al.  Identifying ''best'' applicants in recruiting using data envelopment analysis , 2003 .

[30]  Jeff Kennington,et al.  An Application of Mathematical Programming to Assess Productivity in the Houston Independent School District , 1982 .

[31]  Jill Johnes,et al.  Measuring the Research Performance of UK Economics Departments: An Application of Data Envelopment Analysis , 1993 .

[32]  M. Farrell The Measurement of Productive Efficiency , 1957 .

[33]  Stefano Tarantola,et al.  Handbook on Constructing Composite Indicators: Methodology and User Guide , 2005 .

[34]  A. Hashimoto A DEA SELECTION SYSTEM FOR SELECTIVE EXAMINATIONS , 1996 .

[35]  A. Hashimoto A ranked voting system using a DEA/AR exclusion model: A note , 1997 .

[36]  Jesús T. Pastor,et al.  Radial DEA models without inputs or without outputs , 1999, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[37]  Hans Bjurek,et al.  Benchmarking European labour market performance with efficiency frontier techniques , 2000 .

[38]  J. Beasley Determining Teaching and Research Efficiencies , 1995 .

[39]  O. H. Brownlee,et al.  ACTIVITY ANALYSIS OF PRODUCTION AND ALLOCATION , 1952 .

[40]  Mark J. Mazur Evaluating the Relative Efficiency of Baseball Players , 1994 .

[41]  Emmanuel Thanassoulis,et al.  Applied data envelopment analysis , 1991 .