Sexual harassment and generalized workplace abuse among university employees: prevalence and mental health correlates.

OBJECTIVES This study hypothesized that interpersonal workplace stressors involving sexual harassment and generalized workplace abuse are highly prevalent and significantly linked with mental health outcomes including symptomatic distress, the use and abuse of alcohol, and other drug use. METHODS Employees in 4 university occupational groups (faculty, student, clerical, and service workers; n = 2492) were surveyed by means of a mailed self-report instrument. Cross-tabular and ordinary least squares and logistic regression analyses examined the prevalence of harassment and abuse and their association with mental health status. RESULTS The data show high rates of harassment and abuse. Among faculty, females were subjected to higher rates; among clerical and service workers, males were subjected to higher rates. Male and female clerical and service workers experienced higher levels of particularly severe mistreatment. Generalized abuse was more prevalent than harassment for all groups. Both harassment and abuse were significantly linked to most mental health outcomes for men and women. CONCLUSIONS Interpersonally abusive workplace dynamics constitute a significant public health problem that merits increased intervention and prevention strategies.

[1]  Jennifer L. Berdahl,et al.  The Sexual Harassment of Men?: Exploring the Concept with Theory and Data , 1996 .

[2]  M. Koskenvuo,et al.  Recent interpersonal conflict at work and psychiatric morbidity: a prospective study of 15,530 employees aged 24-64. , 1996, Journal of psychosomatic research.

[3]  L. Fitzgerald,et al.  The incidence and dimensions of sexual harassment in academia and the workplace. , 1988 .

[4]  Laura L. Miller,et al.  Not Just Weapons of the Weak: Gender Harassment as a Form of Protest for Army Men* , 1997 .

[5]  C. Ross,et al.  Control or defense? Depression and the sense of control over good and bad outcomes. , 1990, Journal of health and social behavior.

[6]  K. Rospenda,et al.  DOING POWER , 1998 .

[7]  A. Vaux Paradigmatic Assumptions in Sexual Harassment Research: Being Guided without Being Misled , 1993 .

[8]  N. Bradburn,et al.  Improving mailed questionnaire design , 1984 .

[9]  L. Fitzgerald,et al.  No Safe Haven: Male Violence Against Women at Home, at Work, and in the Community , 1994 .

[10]  M. Gelfand,et al.  Antecedents and consequences of sexual harassment in organizations: a test of an integrated model. , 1997, The Journal of applied psychology.

[11]  Gregg Thomson,et al.  SEXUAL HARASSMENT ON A UNIVERSITY CAMPUS: THE CONFLUENCE OF AUTHORITY RELATIONS, SEXUAL INTEREST AND GENDER STRATIFICATION* , 1982 .

[12]  L. Fitzgerald,et al.  Job-related and psychological effects of sexual harassment in the workplace: empirical evidence from two organizations. , 1997, The Journal of applied psychology.

[13]  L. Radloff The CES-D Scale , 1977 .

[14]  K. Björkqvist,et al.  Aggression among university employees , 1994 .

[15]  L. Fitzgerald,et al.  The Structure of Sexual Harassment: A Confirmatory Analysis across Cultures and Settings , 1995 .

[16]  S. Wilsnack,et al.  Predicting onset and chronicity of women's problem drinking: a five-year longitudinal analysis. , 1991, American journal of public health.

[17]  J. Horn,et al.  A differential assessment model for alcoholism. The scales of the Alcohol Use Inventory. , 1977, Journal of studies on alcohol.

[18]  M. Selzer The Michigan alcoholism screening test: the quest for a new diagnostic instrument. , 1971, The American journal of psychiatry.