Understanding Mechanical Systems Through Computer Animation and Kinematic Imagery. Final Report.

Abstract : One purpose of the research is to develop models of cognitive processes in understanding mechanical systems. A particular focus was on the processes in mentally animating the representation of a mechanical system, and the contribution of animation graphics in comprehension. Several studies, involving eye fixations, verbal protocols and process tracing, indicated that mental animation was difficult for individuals who were not knowledgeable about mechanics. Animation did help them determine the motion of individual components, but animation alone did not entirely compensate for the subject's difficulty in identifying relevant features and ignoring irrelevant features. A second goal of the research was to analyze the differences among individuals who are performing analytic reasoning tasks. The cognitive processes in a widely used, nonverbal test of analytic intelligence, the Raven Progressive Matrices Test were analyzed using experimental and modelling techniques. The processes that distinguish average and superior performance are the ability to induce abstract relations and the ability to dynamically manage a large set of problem solving goals in working memory. Mechanical reasoning, Intelligence testing, Individual differences in problem solving.

[1]  M. Just,et al.  Eye fixations and cognitive processes , 1976, Cognitive Psychology.

[2]  M. Just,et al.  Understanding Machines from Text and Diagrams. , 1989 .

[3]  A. Jensen,et al.  4. The g Beyond Factor Analysis , 1987 .

[4]  Lillian Belmont,et al.  Birth Order, Family Size, and Intelligence , 1973, Science.

[5]  Mary Hegarty,et al.  -1935mental Models of Mechanical Systems: Indiviuln "a9 M5 , 2022 .

[6]  M. Just,et al.  Working memory constraints on the processing of syntactic ambiguity , 1992, Cognitive Psychology.

[7]  Marcel Adam Just,et al.  The Role of Working Memory in Language Comprehension , 1988 .

[8]  Kiichiro Kajiyama Cognitive Processes in Reading a Drawing , 1990 .

[9]  M. Just,et al.  Changes in activation levels with negation. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[10]  M. Just,et al.  From the SelectedWorks of Marcel Adam Just 1992 A capacity theory of comprehension : Individual differences in working memory , 2017 .

[11]  P. Carpenter,et al.  Frames of reference for allocating attention to space: Evidence from the neglect syndrome , 1990, Neuropsychologia.

[12]  J. Raven Advanced progressive matrices : sets I and II , 1962 .

[13]  M A Just,et al.  From the SelectedWorks of Marcel Adam Just 1990 What one intelligence test measures : A theoretical account of the processing in the Raven Progressive Matrices Test , 2016 .

[14]  J. Raven,et al.  Manual for Raven's progressive matrices and vocabulary scales , 1962 .

[15]  M. Just,et al.  Cognitive coordinate systems: accounts of mental rotation and individual differences in spatial ability. , 1985, Psychological review.

[16]  David F. Lohman,et al.  The complexity continuum in the radex and hierarchical models of intelligence , 1983 .

[17]  M. Just,et al.  Mental models of mechanical systems: Individual differences in qualitative and quantitative reasoning , 1988, Cognitive Psychology.

[18]  M. Just,et al.  Individual differences in syntactic processing: The role of working memory , 1991 .