A global diatom database – abundance, biovolume and biomass in the world ocean

Phytoplankton identification and abundance data are now commonly feeding plankton distribution databases worldwide. This study is a first attempt to compile the largest possible body of data available from different databases as well as from individual published or unpublished datasets regarding diatom distribution in the world ocean. The data obtained originate from time series studies as well as spatial studies. This effort is supported by the Marine Ecosystem Model Inter-Comparison Project (MAREMIP), which aims at building consistent datasets for the main Plankton Functional Types (PFT) in order to help validate biogeochemical ocean models by using carbon (C) biomass derived from abundance data. In this study we collected over 293 000 individual geo-referenced data points with diatom abundances from bottle and net sampling. Sampling site distribution was not homogeneous, with 58% of data in the Atlantic, 20% in the Arctic, 12% in the Pacific, 8% in the Indian and 1% in the Southern Ocean. A total of 136 different genera and 607 different species were identified after spell checking and name correction. Only a small fraction of these data were also documented for biovolumes and an even smaller fraction was converted to C biomass. As it is virtually impossible to reconstruct everyone's method for biovolume calculation, which is usually not indicated in the datasets, we decided to undertake the effort to document, for every distinct species, the minimum and maximum cell dimensions, and to convert all the available abundance data into biovolumes and C biomass using a single standardized method. Statistical correction of the database was also adopted to exclude potential outliers and suspicious data points. The final database contains 90 648 data points with converted C biomass. Diatom C biomass calculated from cell sizes spans over eight orders of magnitude. The mean diatom biomass for individual locations, dates and depths is 141.19 μg C l−1, while the median value is 11.16 μg C l−1. Regarding biomass distribution, 19% of data are in the range 0-1 μg C l−1, 29% in the range 1-10 μg C l−1, 31% in the range 10-100 μg C l−1, 18% in the range 100-1000 μg C l−1, and only 3% >1000 μg C l−1. Interestingly, less than 50 species contributed to >90% of global biomass, among which centric species were dominant. Thus, placing significant efforts on cell size measurements, process studies and C quota calculations on these species should considerably improve biomass estimates in the upcoming years. A first-order estimate of the diatom biomass for the global ocean ranges from 449 to 558 Tg C, which converts to 5 to 6 Tmol Si and to an average Si biomass turnover rate of 0.11 to 0.20 d−1. Link to the dataset: preliminary link

[1]  P. Tréguer Silica and the cycle of carbon in the ocean , 2002 .

[2]  C. Duarte,et al.  Biomass distribution in marine planktonic communities , 1997 .

[3]  Guillaume Dirberg,et al.  Bio-optical properties of the marine cyanobacteria Trichodesmium spp. , 2008 .

[4]  J. Norfolk,et al.  Primary Production of the Biosphere , 1976 .

[5]  D. M. Nelson,et al.  Particulate silica and Si recycling in the surface waters of the Eastern Equatorial Pacific , 2011 .

[6]  C. Brown,et al.  Coccolithophorid blooms in the global ocean , 1994 .

[7]  D. M. Nelson,et al.  The Silica Balance in the World Ocean: A Reestimate , 1995, Science.

[8]  B. Quéguiner,et al.  Impact of iron on silicon utilization by diatoms in the Southern Ocean: A case study of Si/N cycle decoupling in a naturally iron-enriched area , 2008 .

[9]  B. Quéguiner,et al.  Deep silicon maxima in the stratified oligotrophic Mediterranean Sea , 2010 .

[10]  J. Randerson,et al.  Primary production of the biosphere: integrating terrestrial and oceanic components , 1998, Science.

[11]  S. Menden‐Deuer,et al.  Effect of preservation on dinoflagellate and diatom cell volume, and consequences for carbon biomass predictions , 2001 .

[12]  Irina Olenina,et al.  Biovolumes and size-classes of phytoplankton in the Baltic Sea , 2006 .

[13]  D. M. Nelson,et al.  Co-limitation of diatoms by iron and silicic acid in the equatorial Pacific , 2011 .

[14]  H. Claustre,et al.  Vertical distribution of phytoplankton communities in open ocean: An assessment based on surface chlorophyll , 2006 .

[15]  D. M. Nelson,et al.  Biogenic silica production and the diatom contribution to primary production and nitrate uptake in the eastern equatorial Pacific Ocean , 2011 .

[16]  A. Sournia,et al.  Marine phytoplankton: how many species in the world ocean? , 1991 .

[17]  M. Brzezinski,et al.  THE Si:C:N RATIO OF MARINE DIATOMS: INTERSPECIFIC VARIABILITY AND THE EFFECT OF SOME ENVIRONMENTAL VARIABLES 1 , 1985 .

[18]  E. Carpenter,et al.  Diatom biomass and productivity in oceanic and plume-influenced waters of the western tropical Atlantic ocean , 2006 .

[19]  B. Quéguiner,et al.  Siliceous phytoplankton production and export related to trans-frontal dynamics of the Almeria-Oran frontal system (western Mediterranean Sea) during winter , 2004 .

[20]  D. M. Nelson,et al.  Production and dissolution of biogenic silica in the ocean: Revised global estimates, comparison with regional data and relationship to biogenic sedimentation , 1995 .

[21]  M. Brzezinski,et al.  A time series study of silica production and flux in an eastern boundary region: Santa Barbara Basin, California , 2001 .

[22]  J. Miquel,et al.  The significance of frontal processes for vertical particle fluxes: A case study in the Alboran Sea (SW Mediterranean Sea) , 1994 .

[23]  P. Falkowski,et al.  Representing key phytoplankton functional groups in ocean carbon cycle models: Coccolithophorids , 2002 .

[24]  Dongyan Liu,et al.  Geometric models for calculating cell biovolume and surface area for phytoplankton , 2003 .

[25]  J. Dunne,et al.  Diagnosing the contribution of phytoplankton functional groups to the production and export of particulate organic carbon, CaCO3, and opal from global nutrient and alkalinity distributions , 2006 .

[26]  M. Brzezinski,et al.  Silica production in the Monterey, California, upwelling system , 1997 .

[27]  Susanne Menden-Deuer,et al.  Carbon to volume relationships for dinoflagellates, diatoms, and other protist plankton , 2000 .

[28]  Scott C. Doney,et al.  MAREDAT: towards a world atlas of MARine Ecosystem DATa , 2013 .

[29]  An examination of cell volume in dominant phytoplankton species of the central and southern Adriatic Sea , 1985 .

[30]  François-Marie Bréon,et al.  Remote sensing of phytoplankton groups in case 1 waters from global SeaWiFS imagery , 2005 .

[31]  C. Brown,et al.  Distribution of calcifying and silicifying phytoplankton in relation to environmental and biogeochemical parameters during the late stages of the 2005 North East Atlantic Spring Bloom , 2009 .

[32]  D. M. Nelson,et al.  Silicon dynamics within an intense open-ocean diatom bloom in the Pacific sector of the Southern Ocean , 2001 .

[33]  B. Quéguiner,et al.  Particulate biogenic silica and carbon production rates and particulate matter distribution in the Indian sector of the Subantarctic Ocean , 2002 .

[34]  Helmut Hillebrand,et al.  BIOVOLUME CALCULATION FOR PELAGIC AND BENTHIC MICROALGAE , 1999 .

[35]  J. Strickland The Ecology of the plankton off La Jolla, California,: In the period April through September, 1967 , 1970 .

[36]  Andrew J. Watson,et al.  Ecosystem dynamics based on plankton functional types for global ocean biogeochemistry models , 2005 .

[37]  D. M. Nelson,et al.  Biogenic silica at the Bermuda Atlantic Time‐series Study site in the Sargasso Sea: Temporal changes and their inferred controls based on a 15‐year record , 2009 .

[38]  Tracy A. Villareal,et al.  Silica production and the contribution of diatoms to new and primary production in the central North Pacific , 1998 .

[39]  A. Leynaert,et al.  A seasonal study of diatom dynamics in the North Atlantic during the POMME experiment (2001): Evidence for Si limitation of the spring bloom , 2005 .

[40]  D. M. Nelson,et al.  A review of the Si cycle in the modern ocean: recent progress and missing gaps in the application of biogenic opal as a paleoproductivity proxy , 2000 .

[41]  S. Alvaina,et al.  Remote sensing of phytoplankton groups in case 1 waters from global SeaWiFS imagery , 2005 .

[42]  Z. Finenko,et al.  Phytoplankton Carbon to Chlorophyll a Ratio. Response to Light, Temperature and Nutrient Limitation. , 2003 .

[43]  Brzezinski Ma,et al.  Silica production in the Sargasso Sea during spring 1989 , 1996 .

[44]  M. Brzezinski,et al.  The annual silica cycle of the North Pacific subtropical gyre , 2011 .

[45]  L. A. Anderson,et al.  Database of diazotrophs in global ocean: abundance, biomass and nitrogen fixation rates , 2012 .

[46]  Ernst Haeckel Plankton-Studien. Vergleichende Untersuchungen über die Bedeutung und Zusammensetzung der pelagischen Fauna und Flora. , 1890 .

[47]  M. Brzezinski,et al.  Biogenic silica production rates and particulate organic matter distribution in the Atlantic sector of the Southern Ocean during austral spring 1992 , 2002 .

[48]  Paul J. Harrison,et al.  Estimating carbon, nitrogen, protein, and chlorophyll a from volume in marine phytoplankton , 1994 .

[49]  T. Platt,et al.  Discrimination of diatoms from other phytoplankton using ocean-colour data , 2004 .

[50]  M. Brzezinski,et al.  Control of silica production by iron and silicic acid during the Southern Ocean Iron Experiment (SOFeX) , 2005 .

[51]  B. Quéguiner,et al.  Silicon cycle in the NW Mediterranean Sea: seasonal study of a coastal oligotrophic site , 2003 .

[52]  B. Quéguiner,et al.  Biovolume and biomass estimates of key diatoms in the Southern Ocean , 2007 .

[53]  C. Völker,et al.  Response to and recovery from nitrogen and silicon starvation in Thalassiosira weissflogii: growth rates, nutrient uptake and C, Si and N content per cell , 2010 .

[54]  J. Strickland THE ECOLOGY OF THE PLANKTON OFF LAJOLLA, CALIFORNIA, IN THE PERIOD , 1970 .

[55]  M. Brzezinski,et al.  The balance between silica production and silica dissolution in the sea: Insights from Monterey Bay, California, applied to the global data set , 2003 .

[56]  Nicholas R. Bates,et al.  Pelagic functional group modeling: Progress, challenges and prospects , 2006 .