RECONSTRUCTING REDSHIFT DISTRIBUTIONS WITH CROSS-CORRELATIONS: TESTS AND AN OPTIMIZED RECIPE

Many of the cosmological tests to be performed by planned dark energy experiments will require extremely well-characterized photometric redshift measurements. Current estimates for cosmic shear are that the true mean redshift of the objects in each photo-z bin must be known to better than 0.002(1 + z), and the width of the bin must be known to ~0.003(1 + z) if errors in cosmological measurements are not to be degraded significantly. A conventional approach is to calibrate these photometric redshifts with large sets of spectroscopic redshifts. However, at the depths probed by Stage III surveys (such as DES), let alone Stage IV (LSST, JDEM, and Euclid), existing large redshift samples have all been highly (25%-60%) incomplete, with a strong dependence of success rate on both redshift and galaxy properties. A powerful alternative approach is to exploit the clustering of galaxies to perform photometric redshift calibrations. Measuring the two-point angular cross-correlation between objects in some photometric redshift bin and objects with known spectroscopic redshift, as a function of the spectroscopic z, allows the true redshift distribution of a photometric sample to be reconstructed in detail, even if it includes objects too faint for spectroscopy or if spectroscopic samples are highly incomplete. We test this technique using mock DEEP2 Galaxy Redshift survey light cones constructed from the Millennium Simulation semi-analytic galaxy catalogs. From this realistic test, which incorporates the effects of galaxy bias evolution and cosmic variance, we find that the true redshift distribution of a photometric sample can, in fact, be determined accurately with cross-correlation techniques. We also compare the empirical error in the reconstruction of redshift distributions to previous analytic predictions, finding that additional components must be included in error budgets to match the simulation results. This extra error contribution is small for surveys that sample large areas of sky (>~10°-100°), but dominant for ~1 deg2 fields. We conclude by presenting a step-by-step, optimized recipe for reconstructing redshift distributions from cross-correlation information using standard correlation measurements.

[1]  D. Madgwick,et al.  The DEEP2 Galaxy Redshift Survey: the relationship between galaxy properties and environment at z∼ 1 , 2006, astro-ph/0603177.

[2]  A. Connolly,et al.  The Deep Evolutionary Exploratory Probe 2 Galaxy Redshift Survey: The Galaxy Luminosity Function to z ~ 1 , 2006 .

[3]  G. Bernstein,et al.  Size of Spectroscopic Calibration Samples for Cosmic Shear Photometric Redshifts , 2007, 0712.1562.

[4]  R. Ellis,et al.  Measurements of $\Omega$ and $\Lambda$ from 42 high redshift supernovae , 1998, astro-ph/9812133.

[5]  Weighing the universe with photometric redshift surveys and the impact on dark energy forecasts , 2006, astro-ph/0605536.

[6]  C. J. Macdonald,et al.  Photometric Redshift Biases from Galaxy Evolution , 2010, 1002.0008.

[7]  G. Bernstein,et al.  Catastrophic photometric redshift errors: weak-lensing survey requirements , 2009, 0902.2782.

[8]  Jeffrey A. Newman,et al.  Calibrating Redshift Distributions beyond Spectroscopic Limits with Cross-Correlations , 2008, 0805.1409.

[9]  J. Kneib,et al.  CATASTROPHIC PHOTO-z ERRORS AND THE DARK ENERGY PARAMETER ESTIMATES WITH COSMIC SHEAR , 2008, 0812.5083.

[10]  T. Lauer,et al.  Observing Dark Energy , 2005 .

[11]  A. Szalay,et al.  Slicing Through Multicolor Space: Galaxy Redshifts from Broadband Photometry , 1995, astro-ph/9508100.

[12]  L. Knox,et al.  Baryon Oscillations and Consistency Tests for Photometrically Determined Redshifts of Very Faint Galaxies , 2005, astro-ph/0509260.

[13]  Roger G. Clowes,et al.  The New Era of Wide‐Field Astronomy , 2001 .

[14]  Masahiro Takada,et al.  Systematic errors in future weak-lensing surveys: requirements and prospects for self-calibration , 2006 .

[15]  P. Peebles,et al.  The Large-Scale Structure of the Universe , 1980 .

[16]  Volker Springel,et al.  The Many lives of AGN: Cooling flows, black holes and the luminosities and colours of galaxies , 2006, astro-ph/0602065.

[17]  A. Szalay,et al.  Bias and variance of angular correlation functions , 1993 .

[18]  The DEEP2 Galaxy Redshift Survey: The Galaxy Luminosity Function to z ~ 1 , 2005, astro-ph/0506041.

[19]  Hu Zhan,et al.  Cosmic tomographies: baryon acoustic oscillations and weak lensing , 2006 .

[20]  G. Bernstein The Variance of Correlation Function Estimates , 1994 .

[21]  A. Szalay,et al.  Higher order correlations of IRAS galaxies , 1992 .

[22]  I. Smail,et al.  The All-Wavelength Extended Groth Strip International Survey (AEGIS) Data Sets , 2006, astro-ph/0607355.

[23]  J. Newman,et al.  The DEEP2 Galaxy Redshift Survey: Color and Luminosity Dependence of Galaxy Clustering at z ∼ 1 , 2007, 0708.0004.

[24]  S. Maddox,et al.  zCOSMOS: A Large VLT/VIMOS Redshift Survey Covering 0 < z < 3 in the COSMOS Field , 2006, astro-ph/0612291.

[25]  M. Phillips,et al.  Observational Evidence from Supernovae for an Accelerating Universe and a Cosmological Constant , 1998, astro-ph/9805201.

[26]  Wayne Hu,et al.  Effects of Photometric Redshift Uncertainties on Weak-Lensing Tomography , 2005 .

[27]  Manfred G. Kitzbichler,et al.  The high‐redshift galaxy population in hierarchical galaxy formation models , 2007 .

[28]  Detection of Cosmic Magnification with the Sloan Digital Sky Survey , 2005, astro-ph/0504510.

[29]  A. Szalay,et al.  Cluster Correlations from N-Point Correlation Amplitudes , 1991 .

[30]  Using Galaxy Two-Point Correlation Functions to Determine the Redshift Distributions of Galaxies Binned by Photometric Redshift , 2006, astro-ph/0606098.

[31]  G. Kauffmann,et al.  The many lives of active galactic nuclei: cooling flows, black holes and the luminosities and colour , 2005, astro-ph/0508046.