Exploiting the natural dynamics of compliant joint robots for cyclic motions

Due to the significant flexibility arising as a result of the incorporation of passive compliance into traditional rigid actuators, that enables the excitation of sizeable resonance movements, the generation of highly dynamic motions using such systems has been studied in the literature; however, a majority of these methods are limited to single actuators. This work presents a novel scheme employing the natural dynamics of compliant joint robots in order to perform cyclic motions. The use of the system's natural dynamics can therefore result in the execution of robot movements that consume a slight amount of energy as compared to the energy they generate, provided that the motion trajectory is on the limit cycle manifold. The energy efficiency advantages during such cyclic motions, which have rarely been studied in the literature, are also discussed. The proposed scheme, which is based on modal decoupling of the system's natural dynamics, is finally evaluated in simulation in order to investigate the energy-efficiency of different modal motions, as well as the effect of various joint stiffness levels.

[1]  Stefano Stramigioli,et al.  Energy-Efficient Variable Stiffness Actuators , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[2]  Nikolaos G. Tsagarakis,et al.  Exploiting natural dynamics for energy minimization using an Actuator with Adjustable Stiffness (AwAS) , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[3]  Martin Buehler,et al.  Control and Stability Analysis of Limit Cycles in a Hopping Robot , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[4]  R. Ortega,et al.  On Tracking Control of Rigid and Flexible Joint Robots , 1995 .

[5]  Sadao Kawamura,et al.  A New Control Method Utilizing Stiffness Adjustment of Mechanical Elastic Elements for Serial Link Systems , 2007, Proceedings 2007 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[6]  Sehoon Oh,et al.  Design and Control Considerations for High-Performance Series Elastic Actuators , 2014, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[7]  Matthew M. Williamson,et al.  Rhythmic robot arm control using oscillators , 1998, Proceedings. 1998 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. Innovations in Theory, Practice and Applications (Cat. No.98CH36190).

[8]  Giuseppe Oriolo,et al.  Control of redundant robots on cyclic trajectories , 1992, Proceedings 1992 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[9]  N. Manamanni,et al.  Control Approach for Legged Robots with Fast Gaits , 2000, J. Intell. Robotic Syst..

[10]  Nikolaos G. Tsagarakis,et al.  Enhanced physical interaction performance for compliant joint manipulators using proxy-based Sliding Mode Control , 2014, 2014 11th International Conference on Informatics in Control, Automation and Robotics (ICINCO).

[11]  Alin Albu-Schäffer,et al.  Modal limit cycle control for variable stiffness actuated robots , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[12]  Ikuo Mizuuchi,et al.  Design and modal analysis of feedback excitation control system for vertical series elastic manipulator , 2013, 2013 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[13]  Alessandro De Luca,et al.  Robots with Flexible Elements , 2016, Springer Handbook of Robotics, 2nd Ed..

[14]  Joel W. Burdick,et al.  Designing feedback algorithms for controlling the periodic motions of legged robots , 1993, [1993] Proceedings IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[15]  Nikos G. Tsagarakis,et al.  Dynamics and Control of an Anthropomorphic Compliant Arm Equipped With Friction Clutches , 2016, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[16]  Bram Vanderborght,et al.  Exploiting Natural Dynamics to Reduce Energy Consumption by Controlling the Compliance of Soft Actuators , 2006, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[17]  Hoda A. ElMaraghy,et al.  Feedback linearization control of flexible joint robots , 1992 .

[18]  Hugh M. Herr,et al.  The effect of series elasticity on actuator power and work output: Implications for robotic and prosthetic joint design , 2006, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[19]  E. Westervelt,et al.  Feedback Control of Dynamic Bipedal Robot Locomotion , 2007 .

[20]  Zexiang Li,et al.  An energy perturbation approach to limit cycle analysis in legged locomotion systems , 1990, 29th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[21]  Nikolaos G. Tsagarakis,et al.  A self-adaptive variable impedance actuator based on intrinsic non-linear compliance and damping principles , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA).

[22]  Antonio Bicchi,et al.  Fast and "soft-arm" tactics [robot arm design] , 2004, IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine.

[23]  Claudio Urrea,et al.  ORBITAL STABILIZATION OF UNDERACTUATED MECHANICAL SYSTEMS , 2002 .

[24]  Nikolaos G. Tsagarakis,et al.  Damping control of variable damping compliant actuators , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA).

[25]  Nikolaos G. Tsagarakis,et al.  Optimal control for maximizing velocity of the CompAct™ compliant actuator , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[26]  Jörn Malzahn,et al.  WALK‐MAN: A High‐Performance Humanoid Platform for Realistic Environments , 2017, J. Field Robotics.

[27]  Bernard Espiau,et al.  A Study of the Passive Gait of a Compass-Like Biped Robot , 1998, Int. J. Robotics Res..