A NURBS based Galerkin approach for the analysis of solids in boundary representation

Abstract The paper is concerned with a new numerical method to solve the elasticity problem of solids in boundary representation. A formulation is derived where the geometrical description of the boundary is sufficient for defining the equations of elasticity of the complete solid. While the interior of the domain is described by a radial scaling parameter, the scaling of the boundary with respect to the specified scaling center leads to the complete solid. This idea fits perfectly to the boundary representation modeling technique commonly employed in CAD. In the present approach the tensor-product structure of the solid will be reduced by one dimension to parametrize the physical domain, i.e., the three-dimensional solid exploits only two-dimensional NURBS objects, which parametrize the boundary surfaces. For the analysis, the weak form of the equilibrium equations is enforced for the entire solid. In particular the weak form is employed in the scaling direction and the circumferential direction. Applying the isogeometric paradigm, the NURBS functions that describe the boundary of the geometry form also the basis for the approximation of the displacement at the boundary. The displacement response in the radial scaling direction, on the other hand, is approximated by a one-dimensional NURBS. Overall, the Galerkin projection of the weak form yields a linear system of equilibrium equations whose solution gives rise to the displacement response. The accuracy of the method is validated by means of analytical reference data. In conclusion, the proposed method allows the analysis of solids which are bounded by an arbitrary number of contour boundaries.

[1]  Gao Lin,et al.  Scaled boundary isogeometric analysis for 2D elastostatics , 2014 .

[2]  Francis Tin-Loi,et al.  A scaled boundary polygon formulation for elasto-plastic analyses , 2014 .

[3]  Chongmin Song,et al.  The scaled boundary finite-element method—alias consistent infinitesimal finite-element cell method—for elastodynamics , 1997 .

[4]  Ernst Rank,et al.  Geometric modeling, isogeometric analysis and the finite cell method , 2012 .

[5]  Sven Klinkel,et al.  A NURBS based hybrid collocation–Galerkin method for the analysis of boundary represented solids , 2015 .

[6]  Sven Klinkel,et al.  The weak substitution method – an application of the mortar method for patch coupling in NURBS‐based isogeometric analysis , 2015 .

[7]  B. Simeon,et al.  Isogeometric Reissner–Mindlin shell analysis with exactly calculated director vectors , 2013 .

[8]  T. Hughes,et al.  Isogeometric analysis : CAD, finite elements, NURBS, exact geometry and mesh refinement , 2005 .

[9]  Sven Klinkel,et al.  Hybrid collocation-Galerkin approach for the analysis of surface represented 3D-solids employing SB-FEM , 2015 .

[10]  T. Hughes,et al.  Isogeometric collocation for elastostatics and explicit dynamics , 2012 .

[11]  S. Natarajan,et al.  Isogeometric analysis enhanced by the scaled boundary finite element method , 2015 .

[12]  Roland Wüchner,et al.  Analysis in computer aided design: Nonlinear isogeometric B-Rep analysis of shell structures , 2015 .

[13]  Ernst Rank,et al.  The finite cell method for three-dimensional problems of solid mechanics , 2008 .

[14]  Josef Hoschek,et al.  Handbook of Computer Aided Geometric Design , 2002 .

[15]  C. C. Long,et al.  Isogeometric analysis of Lagrangian hydrodynamics: Axisymmetric formulation in the rz-cylindrical coordinates , 2014, J. Comput. Phys..

[16]  Alessandro Reali,et al.  Isogeometric collocation: Cost comparison with Galerkin methods and extension to adaptive hierarchical NURBS discretizations , 2013 .

[17]  John A. Evans,et al.  Isogeometric collocation: Neumann boundary conditions and contact , 2015 .

[18]  S. Timoshenko,et al.  Theory of elasticity , 1975 .

[19]  J. Wolf,et al.  The scaled boundary finite-element method – a primer: derivations , 2000 .

[20]  Alessandro Reali,et al.  Isogeometric collocation methods for the Reissner–Mindlin plate problem , 2015 .

[21]  T. Hughes,et al.  Efficient quadrature for NURBS-based isogeometric analysis , 2010 .

[22]  Roland Wüchner,et al.  A Nitsche‐type formulation and comparison of the most common domain decomposition methods in isogeometric analysis , 2014 .

[23]  Ernst Rank,et al.  Weak coupling for isogeometric analysis of non-matching and trimmed multi-patch geometries , 2014 .

[24]  Ian Stroud,et al.  Boundary representation modelling techniques , 2006 .

[25]  John P. Wolf,et al.  The scaled boundary finite-element method: analytical solution in frequency domain , 1998 .

[26]  Michael Kaliske,et al.  A physically and geometrically nonlinear scaled‐boundary‐based finite element formulation for fracture in elastomers , 2014 .

[27]  Roland Wüchner,et al.  Isogeometric analysis of trimmed NURBS geometries , 2012 .

[28]  C. Birk,et al.  Numerical models for the analysis of soil, structure and their interaction , 2016 .

[29]  Alessandro Reali,et al.  An isogeometric collocation approach for Bernoulli–Euler beams and Kirchhoff plates , 2015 .

[30]  Peter Wriggers,et al.  Three-dimensional mortar-based frictional contact treatment in isogeometric analysis with NURBS , 2012 .

[31]  Thomas J. R. Hughes,et al.  Isogeometric Analysis: Toward Integration of CAD and FEA , 2009 .