For Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated with Yttrium-90 Microspheres, Dose Volumetrics on Post-Treatment Bremsstrahlung SPECT/CT Predict Clinical Outcomes

Simple Summary Transarterial radioembolization (TARE) of the liver with Yttrium-90 (Y-90) microspheres is a prominent approach used to treat hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), the most common primary liver cancer and the third-leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Recent studies have found that radiation dose estimates based on pretreatment simulations can predict HCC response to Y-90. We hypothesized that (1) Y-90 microspheres deposit heterogeneously due to variabilities in vascular dynamics; and (2) treatment response is better predicted by evaluating dose coverage of HCC in 3-dimensional space using actual Y-90 biodistribution derived from day-of-treatment nuclear imaging. We reviewed a cohort of 50 consecutive HCC patients with TARE Y-90 lobar treatments at a single institution looking for associations between volumetric dose coverage and clinical outcomes. Best treatment response most often occurred at 6 months post-TARE, with a migration toward better response after 3 months, complicating early imaging assessments. Islands of underdosed HCC appeared to compromise outcomes even when the mean or median dose to tumor was high. When prescribed dose increased along with the burden of disease, so did the mean dose to non-tumorous liver, limiting the safety of dose escalation. A multidisciplinary approach promises to accelerate advances in TARE dosimetry leading to improved clinical outcomes. Abstract In transarterial radioembolization (TARE) of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with Yttrium-90 (Y-90) microspheres, recent studies correlate dosimetry from bremsstrahlung single photon emission tomography (SPECT/CT) with treatment outcomes; however, these studies focus on measures of central tendency rather than volumetric coverage metrics commonly used in radiation oncology. We hypothesized that three-dimensional (3D) isodose coverage of gross tumor volume (GTV) is the driving factor in HCC treatment response to TARE and is best assessed using advanced dosimetry techniques applied to nuclear imaging of actual Y-90 biodistribution. We reviewed 51 lobar TARE Y-90 treatments of 43 HCC patients. Dose prescriptions were 120 Gy for TheraSpheres and 85 Gy for SIR-Spheres. All patients underwent post-TARE Y-90 bremsstrahlung SPECT/CT imaging. Commercial software was used to contour gross tumor volume (GTV) and liver on post-TARE SPECT/CT. Y-90 dose distributions were calculated using the Local Deposition Model based on post-TARE SPECT/CT activity maps. Median gross tumor volume (GTV) dose; GTV receiving less than 100 Gy, 70 Gy and 50 Gy; minimum dose covering the hottest 70%, 95%, and 98% of the GTV (D70, D95, D98); mean dose to nontumorous liver, and disease burden (GTV/liver volume) were obtained. Clinical outcomes were collected for all patients by chart and imaging review. HCC treatment response was assessed according to the modified response criteria in solid tumors (mRECIST) guidelines. Kaplan-Meier (KM) survival estimates and multivariate regression analyses (MVA) were performed using STATA. Median survival was 22.5 months for patients achieving objective response (OR) in targeted lesions (complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) per mRECIST) vs. 7.6 months for non-responders (NR, stable disease or disease progression per mRECIST). On MVA, the volume of underdosed tumor (GTV receiving less than 100 Gy) was the only significant dosimetric predictor for CR (p = 0.0004) and overall survival (OS, p = 0.003). All targets with less than CR (n = 39) had more than 20 cc of underdosed tumor. D70 (p = 0.038) correlated with OR, with mean D70 of 95 Gy for responders and 60 Gy for non-responders (p = 0.042). On MVA, mean dose to nontumorous liver trended toward significant association with grade 3+ toxicity (p = 0.09) and correlated with delivered activity (p < 0.001) and burden of disease (p = 0.05). Dosimetric models supplied area under the curve estimates of > 0.80 predicting CR, OR, and ≥grade 3 acute toxicity. Dosimetric parameters derived from the retrospective analysis of post-TARE Y-90 bremsstrahlung SPECT/CT after lobar treatment of HCC suggest that volumetric coverage of GTV, not a high mean or median dose, is the driving factor in treatment response and that this is best assessed through the analysis of actual Y-90 biodistribution.

[1]  S. Venkat,et al.  Can Post-Treatment Dosimetry Predict Clinical Outcomes in Segmental Transarterial Radioembolization of Hepatocellular Carcinoma? , 2022, International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics.

[2]  N. Trotta,et al.  Comparison of PMT-based TF64 and SiPM-based Vereos PET/CT systems for 90 Y imaging and dosimetry optimization: a quantitative study. , 2022, Medical physics.

[3]  D. Sze,et al.  A global evaluation of advanced dosimetry in transarterial radioembolization of hepatocellular carcinoma with Yttrium-90: the TARGET study , 2022, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[4]  F. Piscaglia,et al.  Experience with regorafenib in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma , 2021, Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology.

[5]  T. Baker,et al.  Safety and efficacy of repeat Y90 radioembolization to the same hepatic arterial territory. , 2021, The British journal of radiology.

[6]  J. Martí-Climent,et al.  Impact of the dosimetry approach on the resulting 90Y radioembolization planned absorbed doses based on 99mTc-MAA SPECT-CT: is there agreement between dosimetry methods? , 2020, EJNMMI Physics.

[7]  K. Rahbar,et al.  Repeated radioembolization in advanced liver cancer , 2020, Annals of translational medicine.

[8]  G. Chatellier,et al.  Relationship of Tumor Radiation-absorbed Dose to Survival and Response in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated with Transarterial Radioembolization with 90Y in the SARAH Study. , 2020, Radiology.

[9]  R. Lencioni,et al.  mRECIST for HCC: Performance and novel refinements. , 2020, Journal of hepatology.

[10]  T. Ruers,et al.  High versus low dose Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for hepatic metastases , 2019, Clinical and translational radiation oncology.

[11]  J. Dai,et al.  A new homogeneity index definition for evaluation of radiotherapy plans , 2019, Journal of applied clinical medical physics.

[12]  K. Rosenzweig,et al.  Safety and efficacy of liver stereotactic body radiation therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma following segmental transarterial radioembolization. , 2019, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[13]  Wengang Li,et al.  Biologically effective dose (BED) of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) was an important factor of therapeutic efficacy in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (≤5 cm) , 2019, BMC Cancer.

[14]  S. Vauclin,et al.  Analysis of differences between 99mTc-MAA SPECT- and 90Y-microsphere PET-based dosimetry for hepatocellular carcinoma selective internal radiation therapy , 2019, EJNMMI Research.

[15]  J. Sicklick,et al.  Guidelines Insights: Hepatobiliary Cancers, Version 2.2019. , 2019, Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN.

[16]  L. Feun,et al.  Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma , 2019, Hepatoma Research.

[17]  Keith T. Chan,et al.  Prospective Trial Using Internal Pair-Production Positron Emission Tomography to Establish the Yttrium-90 Radioembolization Dose Required for Response of Hepatocellular Carcinoma. , 2018, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[18]  O. Blanck,et al.  Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) for liver metastasis – clinical outcomes from the international multi-institutional RSSearch® Patient Registry , 2018, Radiation Oncology.

[19]  E. Mellon,et al.  Stereotactic ablative radiation therapy in the treatment of liver tumors , 2018, Applied Radiation Oncology.

[20]  M. Schipper,et al.  Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy as an Alternative to Transarterial Chemoembolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma. , 2018, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[21]  Rachida Lebtahi,et al.  Efficacy and safety of selective internal radiotherapy with yttrium-90 resin microspheres compared with sorafenib in locally advanced and inoperable hepatocellular carcinoma (SARAH): an open-label randomised controlled phase 3 trial. , 2017, The Lancet. Oncology.

[22]  Jeffrey A. Fessler,et al.  Improved quantitative 90Y bremsstrahlung SPECT/CT reconstruction with Monte Carlo scatter modeling , 2017, Medical physics.

[23]  Matthew S. Johnson,et al.  Correlation of Technetium-99m Macroaggregated Albumin and Yttrium-90 Glass Microsphere Biodistribution in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Retrospective Review of Pretreatment Single Photon Emission CT and Posttreatment Positron Emission Tomography/CT. , 2017, Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR.

[24]  I. F. Durmus,et al.  Correlation between heterogeneity index (HI) and gradient index (GI) for high dose stereotactic radiotherapy/radiosurgery (SRT/SRS) , 2017 .

[25]  L. Dawson,et al.  Predictors of Liver Toxicity Following Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma. , 2015, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[26]  A. Rademaker,et al.  Y90 Radioembolization Significantly Prolongs Time to Progression Compared With Chemoembolization in Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma. , 2016, Gastroenterology.

[27]  S. Kappadath,et al.  Practical reconstruction protocol for quantitative (90)Y bremsstrahlung SPECT/CT. , 2016, Medical physics.

[28]  J. Mechalakos,et al.  SU-F-T-613: Multi-Lesion Cranial SRS VMAT Plan Quality. , 2016, Medical physics.

[29]  M. A. van den Bosch,et al.  90Y Hepatic Radioembolization: An Update on Current Practice and Recent Developments , 2015, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[30]  G. Cheon,et al.  PET/CT-Based Dosimetry in 90Y-Microsphere Selective Internal Radiation Therapy: Single Cohort Comparison With Pretreatment Planning on 99mTc-MAA Imaging and Correlation With Treatment Efficacy , 2015, Medicine.

[31]  N. Obuchowski,et al.  Determination of Radiation Absorbed Dose to Primary Liver Tumors and Normal Liver Tissue Using Post-Radioembolization 90Y PET , 2014, Front. Oncol..

[32]  John E. Bayouth,et al.  A dose homogeneity and conformity evaluation between ViewRay and pinnacle-based linear accelerator IMRT treatment plans , 2014, Journal of medical physics.

[33]  Marnix G E H Lam,et al.  99mTc-Macroaggregated Albumin Poorly Predicts the Intrahepatic Distribution of 90Y Resin Microspheres in Hepatic Radioembolization , 2013, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[34]  S. Minoshima,et al.  Comparison of positron emission tomography and bremsstrahlung imaging to detect particle distribution in patients undergoing yttrium-90 radioembolization for large hepatocellular carcinomas or associated portal vein thrombosis. , 2013, Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR.

[35]  D. Sze,et al.  Safety of Repeated Yttrium-90 Radioembolization , 2013, CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology.

[36]  T. Kataria,et al.  Homogeneity Index: An objective tool for assessment of conformal radiation treatments , 2012, Journal of medical physics.

[37]  V Grégoire,et al.  State of the art on dose prescription, reporting and recording in Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy (ICRU report No. 83). , 2011, Cancer radiotherapie : journal de la Societe francaise de radiotherapie oncologique.

[38]  F. Izzo,et al.  Survival after yttrium‐90 resin microsphere radioembolization of hepatocellular carcinoma across Barcelona clinic liver cancer stages: A European evaluation , 2011, Hepatology.

[39]  T. Dóczi,et al.  [Conformal stereotactic radiosurgery therapy: plan evaluation methods and results]. , 2011, Magyar onkologia.

[40]  J. Ertle,et al.  Radioembolization with yttrium‐90 glass microspheres in hepatocellular carcinoma: European experience on safety and long‐term survival , 2010, Hepatology.

[41]  Lidia Strigari,et al.  Efficacy and Toxicity Related to Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma with 90Y-SIR Spheres: Radiobiologic Considerations , 2010, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[42]  Joseph O Deasy,et al.  Quantitative Analyses of Normal Tissue Effects in the Clinic (QUANTEC): an introduction to the scientific issues. , 2010, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[43]  Samer Ezziddin,et al.  Radioembolization of liver tumors with yttrium-90 microspheres. , 2010, Seminars in nuclear medicine.

[44]  Riccardo Lencioni,et al.  Modified RECIST (mRECIST) Assessment for Hepatocellular Carcinoma , 2010, Seminars in liver disease.

[45]  A. Benson,et al.  Recommendations for radioembolization of hepatic malignancies using yttrium-90 microsphere brachytherapy: a consensus panel report from the radioembolization brachytherapy oncology consortium. , 2007, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[46]  Georges Noël,et al.  Conformity index: a review. , 2006, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[47]  A. Li,et al.  Treatment of inoperable hepatocellular carcinoma with intrahepatic arterial yttrium-90 microspheres: a phase I and II study. , 1994, British Journal of Cancer.

[48]  D. Kelleher,et al.  Selective internal radiation (SIR) therapy for treatment of liver metastases: Measurement of response rate , 1989, Journal of surgical oncology.

[49]  D. Kelleher,et al.  Selective internal radiation therapy: distribution of radiation in the liver. , 1989, European journal of cancer & clinical oncology.

[50]  J. Juni,et al.  Effects of hepatic arterial yttrium 90 glass microspheres in dogs , 1988, Cancer.