Applying Common Identity and Bond Theory to Design of Online Communities

Online communities depend upon the commitment and voluntary participation of their members. Community design — site navigation, community structure and features, and organizational policies — is critical in this regard. Community design affects how people can interact, the information they receive about one another and the community, and how they can participate in community activities. We argue that the constraints and opportunities inherent in online community design influence how people become attached to the community and whether they are willing to expend effort on its behalf. We examine two theories of group attachment and link these theories with design decisions for online communities. Common identity theory makes predictions about the causes and consequences of people's attachment to the group as a whole. Common bond theory makes predictions about the causes and consequences of people's attachment to individual group members. We review causes of common identity and common bond, and show how they result in different kinds of attachment and group outcomes. We then show how design decisions, such as those focused on recruiting newcomers versus retaining existing members, constraining or promoting off-topic discussion, and limiting group size or allowing uncontrolled growth, can lead to common identity or interpersonal bonds among community members, and consequently to different levels and forms of community participation by those so motivated.

[1]  K. Back.  Influence through social communication. , 1951, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[2]  K. Lewin,et al.  Field Theory in Social Science: Selected Theoretical Papers , 1951 .

[3]  M. Smith.  Field Theory in Social Science: Selected Theoretical Papers. , 1951 .

[4]  T. Newcomb.  An approach to the study of communicative acts. , 1953, Psychological review.

[5]  T. Newcomb.  The acquaintance process , 1961 .

[6]  H. H. Spitz,et al.  Cross-Cultural Differences. , 1963, Science.

[7]  P. Blau.  Exchange and Power in Social Life , 1964 .

[8]  B. Anderson,et al.  Sociological theories in progress , 1966 .

[9]  R. Zajonc.  Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. , 1968 .

[10]  D. Byrne.  The Attraction Paradigm , 1971 .

[11]  H. Tajfel,et al.  Social categorization and intergroup behaviour , 1971 .

[12]  M. Greenberger.  Computers, Communications and the Public Interest , 1971 .

[13]  Jay R. Galbraith.  Organization Design , 1977 .

[14]  Jeffrey Pfeffer,et al.  Organizational demography and turnover in top-management groups. , 1984 .

[15]  M. Hogg,et al.  Interpersonal attraction, social identification and psychological group formation , 1985 .

[16]  David Krackhardt,et al.  The snowball effect: Turnover embedded in communication networks. , 1986 .

[17]  S. Stewman.  Organizational demography. , 1988, Annual review of sociology.

[18]  John M. Levine,et al.  Newcomers and oldtimers in small groups. , 1989 .

[19]  M. Hogg,et al.  Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. , 1989 .

[20]  R. Hinde,et al.  The Possibility of Cooperation@@@Cooperation: The Basis of Sociability.@@@Cooperation and Prosocial Behavior.@@@Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. , 1990 .

[21]  M. Karasawa,et al.  Toward an assessment of social identity: the structure of group identification and its effects on in-group evaluations. , 1991, The British journal of social psychology.

[22]  D. P. Leyden,et al.  Familiarity and Group Productivity , 1991 .

[23]  Michael A. Hogg,et al.  The Social Psychology of Group Cohesiveness: From Attraction to Social Identity , 1992 .

[24]  S. Milgram,et al.  The Individual In A Social World: Essays and Experiments , 1992 .

[25]  M. Hogg.  Group Cohesiveness: A Critical Review and Some New Directions , 1993 .

[26]  Kipling D. Williams,et al.  Interpersonal Relations and Group Processes Social Loafing: a Meta-analytic Review and Theoretical Integration , 2022 .

[27]  L. Miller,et al.  Self-disclosure and liking: a meta-analytic review. , 1994, Psychological bulletin.

[28]  J. Ledyard.  Public Goods: A Survey of Experimental Research , 1994 .

[29]  Deborah A. Prentice,et al.  Asymmetries in Attachments to Groups and to their Members: Distinguishing between Common-Identity and Common-Bond Groups , 1994 .

[30]  P. Kollock,et al.  Managing the virtual commons : Cooperation and conflict in computer communities , 1996 .

[31]  M. Brewer,et al.  Who is this "We"? Levels of collective identity and self representations. , 1996 .

[32]  Paul Resnick,et al.  Recommender Systems - Introduction to the Special Section , 1997, Commun. ACM.

[33]  Paul Resnick,et al.  Recommender systems , 1997, CACM.

[34]  S. Karau,et al.  Group cohesiveness and social loafing: Effects of a social interaction manipulation on individual motivation within groups. , 1998 .

[35]  Peter W. Foltz,et al.  An introduction to latent semantic analysis , 1998 .

[36]  E. Day,et al.  Social identity and individual productivity within groups. , 1998, The British journal of social psychology.

[37]  Kathleen M. Carley,et al.  Choosing Work Group Members: Balancing Similarity, Competence, and Familiarity. , 2000, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[38]  Elizabeth A. McGlynn,et al.  Reducing intergroup conflict: From superordinate goals to decategorization, recategorization, and mutual differentiation. , 2000 .

[39]  Jenny Preece,et al.  Online Communities: Designing Usability and Supporting Sociability , 2000 .

[40]  Amy Jo Kim,et al.  Community building on the Web , 2000 .

[41]  Tom Postmes,et al.  SIDE issues centre stage: Recent developments in studies of de-individuation in groups. , 2000 .

[42]  M. Hogg,et al.  Social Identity and Self-Categorization Processes in Organizational Contexts , 2000 .

[43]  J. Pennebaker,et al.  Who talks? The social psychology of illness support groups. , 2000, The American psychologist.

[44]  Ralph Schroeder,et al.  Small-Group Behavior in a Virtual and Real Environment: A Comparative Study , 2000, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[45]  T. T. Postmes,et al.  Refining the cognitive redefinition of the group: Deindividuation effects in common bond vs. common identity groups. , 2000 .

[46]  Robert D. Putnam,et al.  Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of American community , 2000, CSCW '00.

[47]  Bret R. Shaw,et al.  Experiences of Women with Breast Cancer: Exchanging Social Support over the CHESS Computer Network , 2000, Journal of health communication.

[48]  N. D. de Vries,et al.  When the Going Gets Tough, the Tough Get Going: Social Identification and Individual Effort in Intergroup Competition , 2000 .

[49]  Eric A. von Hippel,et al.  How Open Source Software Works: 'Free' User-to-User Assistance? , 2000 .

[50]  Marilynn B. Brewer,et al.  The Many Faces of SocialIdentity: Implications for Political Psychology , 2001 .

[51]  T. Postmes,et al.  Social Influence in Computer-Mediated Communication: The Effects of Anonymity on Group Behavior , 2001 .

[52]  Brian S. Butler,et al.  Membership Size, Communication Activity, and Sustainability: A Resource-Based Model of Online Social Structures , 2001, Inf. Syst. Res..

[53]  Tom Postmes,et al.  Communication and Commitment in Organizations: A Social Identity Approach , 2001 .

[54]  E. Friedman,et al.  The Social Cost of Cheap Pseudonyms , 2001 .

[55]  Derek Powazek,et al.  Design for Community: The Art of Connecting Real People in Virtual Places , 2001 .

[56]  J. Preece,et al.  Online communities: focusing on sociability and usability , 2002 .

[57]  Tom Postmes,et al.  Cognitive and strategic processes in small groups: effects of anonymity of the self and anonymity of the group on social influence. , 2002, The British journal of social psychology.

[58]  Joseph B. Walther,et al.  Time effects in computer-mediated groups: Past, present, and future. , 2002 .

[59]  Sonja Utz,et al.  Distributive Justice in Common-Bond and Common-Identity Groups , 2002 .

[60]  Katelyn Y. A. McKenna,et al.  Relationship formation on the Internet: What's the big attraction? , 2002 .

[61]  K. Sassenberg.  Common bond and common identity groups on the Internet: Attachment and normative behavior in on-topic and off-topic chats. , 2002 .

[62]  Jonathon N. Cummings,et al.  The quality of online social relationships , 2002, CACM.

[63]  Pamela J. Hinds,et al.  Time Effects in Computer-Mediated Groups: Past, Present, and Future , 2002 .

[64]  J. Herbsleb,et al.  Two case studies of open source software development: Apache and Mozilla , 2002, TSEM.

[65]  T. Postmes,et al.  Intergroup differentiation in computer-mediated communication: Effects of depersonalization , 2002 .

[66]  Friedrich-Schiller-Universitat Jena.  Common Bond and Common Identity Groups on the Internet: Attachment and Normative Behavior in On-Topic and Off-Topic Chats , 2002 .

[67]  Suzanne P. Weisband,et al.  Social capital and volunteerism in virtual communities: the case of the Internet Chess Club , 2002, Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[68]  Margarete Boos,et al.  Attitude Change in Computer-Mediated Communication: Effects of Anonymity and Category Norms , 2003 .

[69]  B. Butler.  When is a Group not a Group: An Empirical Examination of Metaphors for Online Social Structure , 2003 .

[70]  Marko Čupić,et al.  Online communities – Designing Usability, Supporting Sociability , 2003 .

[71]  M. Yuki,et al.  Intergroup comparison versus intragroup relationships: A cross-cultural examination of social identity theory in North American and East Asian cultural contexts. , 2003 .

[72]  W. Gardner,et al.  Circle of Friends or Members of a Group? Sex Differences in Relational and Collective Attachment to Groups , 2003 .

[73]  Sonja Utz,et al.  Social identification and interpersonal attraction in MUDs. , 2003 .

[74]  Nicolas Michinov,et al.  Social identity, group processes and performance in synchronous computer-mediated communication , 2004 .

[75]  Gilad Ravid,et al.  De-lurking in virtual communities: a social communication network approach to measuring the effects of social and cultural capital , 2004, 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2004. Proceedings of the.

[76]  Jennifer Preece,et al.  The top five reasons for lurking: improving community experiences for everyone , 2004, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[77]  David Gefen,et al.  Virtual Community Attraction: Why People Hang Out Online , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[78]  Dan Cosley,et al.  Think different: increasing online community participation using uniqueness and group dissimilarity , 2004, CHI.

[79]  R. Bagozzi,et al.  A Social Influence Model of Consumer Participation in Network- and Small-Group-Based Virtual Communities , 2004 .

[80]  T. Postmes,et al.  Short Communication A social identity approach to trust: Interpersonal perception, group membership and trusting behaviour , 2005 .

[81]  Cliff Lampe,et al.  Follow the (slash) dot: effects of feedback on new members in an online community , 2005, GROUP.

[82]  P. Rogers,et al.  Social presence in distributed group environments: The role of social identity , 2005, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[83]  Amy Bruckman,et al.  Becoming Wikipedian: transformation of participation in a collaborative online encyclopedia , 2005, GROUP.

[84]  Courtenay Honeycutt,et al.  Hazing as a Process of Boundary Maintenance in an Online Community , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[85]  M. Brewer,et al.  Cross-Cultural Differences in Relationship- and Group-Based Trust , 2005, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[86]  T. Postmes,et al.  Individuality and social influence in groups: inductive and deductive routes to group identity. , 2005, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[87]  Xin Li,et al.  Using Social Psychology to Motivate Contributions to Online Communities , 2005, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[88]  Yair Amichai-Hamburger.  Internet Minimal Group Paradigm , 2005, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[89]  Carolyn Penstein Rosé,et al.  Talk to me: foundations for successful individual-group interactions in online communities , 2006, CHI.

[90]  Danyel Fisher,et al.  You Are Who You Talk To: Detecting Roles in Usenet Newsgroups , 2006, Proceedings of the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'06).

[91]  John Riedl,et al.  Using intelligent task routing and contribution review to help communities build artifacts of lasting value , 2006, CHI.

[92]  S. Kiesler,et al.  Community Effort in Online Groups: Who Does the Work and Why? , 2007 .