Hysteresis behavior of t-stub connections with superelastic shape memory fasteners

Abstract This study compares the energy dissipative characteristics of bolted t-stub connections using steel and shape memory alloy (SMA) fasteners. The initial phase of the study focused on the optimization of the SMA superelastic effect using two different heat treatment temperatures. The samples were then subjected to tensile testing to determine transformation stress, tensile strength, and fracture strain. In addition, low cycle fatigue tests were conducted to examine the energy dissipative characteristics of these superelastic SMAs heat treated at the two temperatures. The cycled samples were then tensile tested to determine the effect of fatigue cycling on transformation stress, tensile strength, and fracture strain. Results from the mechanical tests were analyzed to determine the preferred heat treatment temperature that resulted in the least residual strain and the largest energy dissipative characteristics. The second phase of the study involved t-stub connection testing using steel and SMA double-ended threaded rod fasteners. The optimum heat treatment determined in the first phase was used to develop the SMA fasteners for the t-stub connection tests. Experimental hysteresis results from the t-stub connection tests were used to compare the energy dissipation capacity of the connections with SMA and steel fasteners.

[1]  D. Williams,et al.  Biocompatibility of clinical implant materials , 1981 .

[2]  W. J. Buehler,et al.  A summary of recent research on the nitinol alloys and their potential application in ocean engineering , 1968 .

[3]  T. Read,et al.  Plastic Deformation and Diffusionless Phase Changes in Metals — the Gold-Cadmium Beta Phase , 1951 .

[4]  Hiroyuki Tamai,et al.  Pseudoelastic behavior of shape memory alloy wire and its application to seismic resistance member for building , 2002 .

[5]  Shuichi Miyazaki,et al.  Cyclic stress-strain characteristics of TiNi and TiNiCu shape memory alloys , 1995 .

[6]  C. M. Wayman,et al.  Shape-Memory Materials , 2018 .

[7]  Ali Abolmaali,et al.  Hysteresis behavior of semi-rigid double web angle steel connections , 2003 .

[8]  Reginald DesRoches,et al.  SHAPE MEMORY ALLOYS IN SEISMIC RESISTANT DESIGN AND RETROFIT: A CRITICAL REVIEW OF THEIR POTENTIAL AND LIMITATIONS , 2004 .

[9]  A. Abolmaali,et al.  MOMENT-ROTATION HYSTERESIS BEHAVIOR OF TOP AND SEAT ANGLE STEEL FRAME CONNECTIONS , 1999 .

[10]  Hisaaki Tobushi,et al.  Influence of strain rate on superelastic properties of TiNi shape memory alloy , 1998 .

[11]  Yoshiyuki Suzuki,et al.  Using NiTi SMA tendons for vibration control of coastal structures , 2001 .

[12]  J. Humbeeck Damping capacity of thermoelastic martensite in shape memory alloys , 2003 .

[13]  Krzysztof Wilde,et al.  Base isolation system with shape memory alloy device for elevated highway bridges , 2000 .

[14]  Roberto T. Leon,et al.  Steel Beam-Column Connections using Shape Memory Alloys , 2004 .

[15]  Reginald DesRoches,et al.  CYCLIC PROPERTIES OF SUPERELASTIC SHAPE MEMORY ALLOY WIRES AND BARS , 2004 .