Uplink Performance Improvement by Decoupling Uplink/Downlink Access in HetNets

In dense and heterogeneous cellular networks (HetNets), significant imbalance between uplink (UL) and downlink (DL) transmissions may happen in regard to signal-to-interference-and-noise ratio and traffic load. Under this circumstance, decoupled UL/DL access (DUDA) is proposed for HetNets for improving system performance. In this paper, we theoretically investigate UL performance improvement brought by a DUDA mode over a conventional coupled UL/DL access (CUDA) mode based on stochastic geometry theory. We employ fractional power control to determine location-dependent user transmit power. We consider two kinds of user equipment distributions, namely uniform and clustered distributions, which are modeled as Poisson point and Neyman–Scott cluster processes, respectively. Numerical results reveal that system performance in terms of spectral efficiency and energy efficiency of the DUDA mode is better than or equal to that of the CUDA mode in HetNets. We identify the conditions under which the DUDA mode performs significantly better than the CUDA mode. Numerical results also show that the DUDA mode can improve load balance and fairness. In addition, we find that the DUDA mode is more beneficial for ultradense networks. Simulation results further validate the effectiveness and accuracy of our analytical model.

[1]  Muhammad Ali Imran,et al.  How much energy is needed to run a wireless network? , 2011, IEEE Wireless Communications.

[2]  Dacheng Yang,et al.  Energy efficiency model based on stochastic geometry in dynamic TDD cellular networks , 2014, 2014 IEEE International Conference on Communications Workshops (ICC).

[3]  Martin Haenggi,et al.  Interference and Outage in Clustered Wireless Ad Hoc Networks , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[4]  Jeffrey G. Andrews,et al.  Heterogeneous Cellular Networks with Flexible Cell Association: A Comprehensive Downlink SINR Analysis , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[5]  Jeffrey G. Andrews,et al.  Seven ways that HetNets are a cellular paradigm shift , 2013, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[6]  Jeffrey G. Andrews,et al.  Analytical Modeling of Uplink Cellular Networks , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[7]  Gang Feng,et al.  A Comparison Study of Coupled and Decoupled Uplink-Downlink Access in Heterogeneous Cellular Networks , 2014, GLOBECOM 2014.

[8]  Yi Zhong,et al.  Local delay and energy efficiency analysis in HetNets with random DTX scheme , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC).

[9]  Jeffrey G. Andrews,et al.  Why to decouple the uplink and downlink in cellular networks and how to do it , 2015, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[10]  Liljana Gavrilovska,et al.  Efficiency Analysis of Decoupled Downlink and Uplink Access in Heterogeneous Networks , 2014, ArXiv.

[11]  M. Rupp,et al.  Performance of femtocell access point deployments in user hot-spot scenarios , 2012, Australasian Telecommunication Networks and Applications Conference (ATNAC) 2012.

[12]  Wenyi Zhang,et al.  HetNets With Random DTX Scheme: Local Delay and Energy Efficiency , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[13]  Jeffrey G. Andrews,et al.  What Will 5G Be? , 2014, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[14]  Martin Haenggi,et al.  Stochastic Geometry for Modeling, Analysis, and Design of Multi-Tier and Cognitive Cellular Wireless Networks: A Survey , 2013, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[15]  Liljana Gavrilovska,et al.  Analysis of the Decoupled Access for Downlink and Uplink in Wireless Heterogeneous Networks , 2014, IEEE Wireless Communications Letters.

[16]  Ekram Hossain,et al.  On Stochastic Geometry Modeling of Cellular Uplink Transmission With Truncated Channel Inversion Power Control , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[17]  Yi Zhong,et al.  Multi-Channel Hybrid Access Femtocells: A Stochastic Geometric Analysis , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Communications.

[18]  Armin Dammann,et al.  Multi-Carrier Systems & Solutions 2009, Proceedings from the 7th International Workshop on Multi-Carrier Systems & Solutions, May 2009, Herrsching, Germany , 2009, Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering.

[19]  Mazen O. Hasna,et al.  Modeling Heterogeneous Cellular Networks Interference Using Poisson Cluster Processes , 2015, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[20]  D. Stoyan,et al.  Stochastic Geometry and Its Applications , 1989 .

[21]  Muhammad Ali Imran,et al.  Energy Efficient Inter-Frequency Small Cell Discovery in Heterogeneous Networks , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[22]  Federico Boccardi,et al.  Downlink and Uplink Decoupling: A disruptive architectural design for 5G networks , 2014, 2014 IEEE Global Communications Conference.

[23]  Martin Haenggi,et al.  Stochastic Geometry for Wireless Networks , 2012 .

[24]  Zhengang Pan,et al.  Toward green and soft: a 5G perspective , 2014, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[25]  Carsten F. Ball,et al.  Uplink Power Control Performance in UTRAN LTE Networks , 2009, MCSS.

[26]  Yi Zhong,et al.  Dynamic TDD enhancement through distributed interference coordination , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC).

[27]  Jeffrey G. Andrews,et al.  User Association for Load Balancing in Heterogeneous Cellular Networks , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[28]  Jeffrey G. Andrews,et al.  Joint Rate and SINR Coverage Analysis for Decoupled Uplink-Downlink Biased Cell Associations in HetNets , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.