Letting users into our world: Some organizational implications of user-generated content

It has been well established that organizations often need to restructure themselves to meet new technological challenges. We review the organizational impact of a recent technological development, sometimes referred to as Web 2.0 that enables users to leverage the Internet and generate “user-generated content” by acting as a supplier, co-producer, or even innovator of products and services. We draw on the social studies of technology, including actor-network theory to develop a conceptual understanding of how this phenomenon is challenging deeply entrenched mental models among managers and management theorists as well as problematizing the way organizational boundaries are conventionally drawn.

[1]  Shoshana Zuboff.  In the Age of the Smart Machine , 1988 .

[2]  C. Shapiro,et al.  Network Externalities, Competition, and Compatibility , 1985 .

[3]  Martin S. Fridson,et al.  Memoirs of Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds , 2019 .

[4]  M. Callon,et al.  Некоторые элементы социологии перевода: приручение морских гребешков и рыболовов бухты Сен-Бриё , 2017 .

[5]  Tom R. Burns,et al.  The Management of Innovation. , 1963 .

[6]  Joan C. Woodward.  Industrial Organization: Theory and Practice , 1966 .

[7]  Knut H. Sørensen,et al.  Making Technology Our Own?: Domesticating Technology Into Everyday Life , 1996 .

[8]  V. Ambrosini,et al.  Value Creation Versus Value Capture: Towards a Coherent Definition of Value in Strategy , 2000 .

[9]  Trevor Pinch,et al.  How users matter : The co-construction of users and technologies , 2003 .

[10]  Don Tapscott,et al.  Wikinomics: How Mass Collaboration Changes Everything , 2006 .

[11]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Capturing the Complexity in Advanced Technology Use: Adaptive Structuration Theory , 1994 .

[12]  F. Scherer,et al.  Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance. , 1971 .

[13]  Clayton M. Christensen,et al.  CUSTOMER POWER, STRATEGIC INVESTMENT, AND THE FAILURE OF LEADING FIRMS , 1996 .

[14]  Wim G. Biemans,et al.  User and third-party involvement in developing medical equipment innovations☆ , 1991 .

[15]  Steven B. Andrews,et al.  Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition , 1995, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[16]  E. Hippel.  Innovation by User Communities: Learning From Open-Source Software , 2001 .

[17]  Jason Wilson,et al.  3G to Web 2.0? Can Mobile Telephony Become an Architecture of Participation? , 2006 .

[18]  Georg von Krogh,et al.  Open Source Software and the "Private-Collective" Innovation Model: Issues for Organization Science , 2003, Organ. Sci..

[19]  Corina Pascu,et al.  The potential disruptive impact of Internet2 based technologies , 2007, First Monday.

[20]  Howard Rheingold,et al.  Smart Mobs: The Next Social Revolution , 2002 .

[21]  Sanjay Jain,et al.  Incomplete by Design and Designing for Incompleteness , 2008 .

[22]  Lars Frederiksen,et al.  Why Do Users Contribute to Firm-Hosted User Communities? The Case of Computer-Controlled Music Instruments , 2006, Organ. Sci..

[23]  M. Callon.  Techno-economic Networks and Irreversibility , 1990 .

[24]  A. Appadurai.  The social life of things: Toward an anthropology of thing , 1986 .

[25]  K. Munir,et al.  Discontinuity and After: the Social Dynamics of Technology Evolution and Dominance , 2004 .

[26]  John Roberts,et al.  The nature of lead users and measurement of leading edge status , 2004 .

[27]  W. Powell,et al.  The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields , 1983 .

[28]  D. Leonard-Barton,et al.  Wellsprings of Knowledge: Building and Sustaining the Sources of Innovation , 1995 .

[29]  Sonali K. Shah,et al.  The Accidental Entrepreneur: The Emergent and Collective Process of User Entrepreneurship , 2007 .

[30]  Peter R Magnusson,et al.  Customer-oriented product development : experiments involving users in service innovation , 2003 .

[31]  Carliss Y. Baldwin,et al.  Managing in an age of modularity. , 1997, Harvard business review.

[32]  David B. Kletter,et al.  Shrinking Core, Expanding Periphery: The Relational Architecture of High-Performing Organizations , 2005 .

[33]  D. North.  Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance: Economic performance , 1990 .

[34]  Stuart Hall,et al.  Doing Cultural Studies: The Story of the Sony Walkman , 1997 .

[35]  Gordon R. Foxall,et al.  A conceptual extension of the customer-active paradigm , 1986 .

[36]  Eric S. Raymond,et al.  The cathedral and the bazaar - musings on Linux and Open Source by an accidental revolutionary , 2001 .

[37]  A. Toffler,et al.  Revolutionary Wealth: How it will be created and how it will change our lives , 2006 .

[38]  M. Hannan,et al.  The Population Ecology of Organizations , 1977, American Journal of Sociology.

[39]  Viviana A. Zelizer,et al.  Morals and Markets: The Development of Life Insurance in the United States , 1979 .

[40]  Rudi Volti,et al.  America Calling: A Social History of the Telephone to 1940 , 1992 .

[41]  R. Garud,et al.  Bricolage versus breakthrough: distributed and embedded agency in technology entrepreneurship , 2003 .

[42]  J. Giles.  Internet encyclopaedias go head to head , 2005, Nature.

[43]  Richard L. Priem,et al.  Is the Resource-Based “View” a Useful Perspective for Strategic Management Research? , 2001 .

[44]  Lars Bo Jeppesen,et al.  Consumers as Co-developers: Learning and Innovation Outside the Firm , 2003, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[45]  John Seely Brown,et al.  Book Reviews : The Social Life of Information By John Seely Brown and Paul Duguid. Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 2000. 320 pages , 2000 .

[46]  Udo Zander,et al.  The Inside Track: On the Important (But Neglected) Role of Customers in the Resource - Based View of Strategy and Firm Growth , 2005 .

[47]  D. Teece.  Reflections on "Profiting from Innovation" , 2006 .

[48]  Lucy Suchman,et al.  Supporting Articulation Work , 1995, Computerization and Controversy, 2nd Ed..

[49]  C. Prahalad,et al.  The Future of Competition: Co-Creating Unique Value With Customers , 2004 .

[50]  Andrea Gaggioli,et al.  Working the Crowd , 2008, Science.

[51]  Sonali K. Shah,et al.  How Communities Support Innovative Activities: An Exploration of Assistance and Sharing Among End-Users , 2003 .

[52]  Eric von Hippel,et al.  Finding Commercially Attractive User Innovations: A Test of Lead User Theory , 2005 .

[53]  Eric von Hippel,et al.  A Customer-active Paradigm for Industrial Product Idea Generation , 1978 .

[54]  Clayton M. Christensen.  The Ongoing Process of Building a Theory of Disruption , 2006 .

[55]  J. Barney.  Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[56]  John R. Harris,et al.  Inside the Black Box: Technology and Economics , 1984 .

[57]  Beth A. Bechky,et al.  The Emergence of Governance in an Open Source Community , 2007 .

[58]  Roger Silverstone,et al.  Towards the "communication society" , 2005 .

[59]  Wiebe E. Bijker,et al.  Science in action : how to follow scientists and engineers through society , 1989 .

[60]  Beth A. Bechky,et al.  When Collections of Creatives Become Creative Collectives: A Field Study of Problem Solving at Work , 2006, Organ. Sci..

[61]  E. Penrose.  The theory of the growth of the firm twenty-five years after , 1960 .

[62]  Grant Mccracken,et al.  New approaches to the symbolic character of consumer goods and activities , 1989 .

[63]  A. Pickering.  Science as practice and culture , 1992 .

[64]  P. Bourdieu.  Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste* , 2018, Food and Culture.

[65]  Shoshana Zuboff,et al.  The Support Economy: Why Corporations Are Failing Individuals and the Next Episode of Capitalism , 2002 .

[66]  J. Bain.  Barriers to new competition , 1957 .

[67]  E. Ostrom,et al.  The Drama of the Commons , 2002 .

[68]  Dorothy Leonard-Barton,et al.  Developer-User Interaction and User Satisfaction in Internal Technology Transfer , 1993 .

[69]  Clayton M. Christensen.  The Innovator's Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail , 2013 .

[70]  E. Hippel,et al.  Lead users: a source of novel product concepts , 1986 .

[71]  O. Williamson.  Markets and hierarchies, analysis and antitrust implications : a study in the economics of internal organization , 1975 .

[72]  W. Orlikowski.  Using Technology and Constituting Structures: A Practice Lens for Studying Technology in Organizations , 2000 .

[73]  J. Law.  A Sociology of monsters: Essays on power, technology, and domination , 1991 .

[74]  V. Frissen.  Gender is Calling: Some Reflections on Past, Present and Future Uses of the Telephone , 2018, The Gender-Technology Relation.

[75]  C. Bullard.  Shaping technology/Building society , 1994 .

[76]  Bernhard L. Krieger,et al.  Making internet communities work: reflections on an unusual business model , 2003, DATB.

[77]  B. Latour,et al.  Don't throw the baby out with the bath school! A reply to Collins and Yearley , 1992 .

[78]  M. Callon.  An Essay on the Growing Contribution of Economic Markets to the Proliferation of the Social , 2007 .

[79]  D. Teece,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1997 .

[80]  Stephen L. Vargo,et al.  Evolving to a New Dominant Logic for Marketing , 2004 .

[81]  Alan Berkeley Thomas,et al.  Controversies in Management , 1993 .

[82]  H. Chesbrough.  Open Business Models: How to Thrive in the New Innovation Landscape , 2006 .

[83]  James M. Utterback,et al.  The Process of Technological Innovation Within the Firm , 1971 .

[84]  A. Appadurai.  The social life of things: Introduction: commodities and the politics of value , 1986 .

[85]  Arthur P. Brief,et al.  Editor's Comments: Bringing in Consumers , 2003 .

[86]  H. Chesbrough,et al.  The Role of the Business Model in Capturing Value from Innovation: Evidence from Xerox Corporation's Technology Spin-Off Companies , 2002 .