Characteristics of Open Source Software Projects for the General Population: Reciprocity and Network Effects

In this paper, we conceptualize about, and empirically test for, differences between the more traditional Open Source Software (OSS) projects that are aimed towards techies-only and the projects that are aimed towards the general population. By drawing upon the theories of Reciprocity and Network Effects, we propose that OSS projects for techies-only are more likely to exhibit characteristics that are explained by balanced reciprocity, whereas OSS projects for the general population are more likely to show characteristics that are rooted in generalized reciprocity. In addition, we propose that local network effects can be used to explain certain characteristics of OSS projects for techies-only, whereas direct and indirect network effects shape the corresponding characteristics of OSS projects for the general population differently. The findings support our hypotheses and lead us to recommend actions for OSS projects targeted towards the general population, as well as suggestions for future research.

[1]  Maria Laura Parisi,et al.  From planning to mature: On the success of open source projects , 2007 .

[2]  E. Fehr,et al.  Fairness and Retaliation: The Economics of Reciprocity , 2000, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[3]  Brian Fitzgerald,et al.  The Transformation of Open Source Software , 2006, MIS Q..

[4]  Moe Thandar Wynn,et al.  Robust performance analysis on YAWL process models with advanced constructs , 2011 .

[5]  David M. Nichols,et al.  The Usability of Open Source Software , 2003, First Monday.

[6]  Brian Fitzgerald,et al.  OPEN SOURCE SOFTWARE IN THE TRENCHES: LESSONS FROM A LARGE-SCALE OSS IMPLEMENTATION 1 , 2003 .

[7]  J. Leon Zhao,et al.  Reputation management in an open source developer social network: An empirical study on determinants of positive evaluations , 2012, Decis. Support Syst..

[8]  R. Cialdini.  Influence: Science and Practice , 1984 .

[9]  David M. Nichols,et al.  Usability processes in open source projects , 2006, Softw. Process. Improv. Pract..

[10]  D Krebs.  Empathy and altruism. , 1975, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[11]  Richard T. Watson,et al.  The business of open source , 2008, CACM.

[12]  Likoebe M. Maruping,et al.  Impacts of License Choice and Organizational Sponsorship on User Interest and Development Activity in Open Source Software Projects , 2006, Inf. Syst. Res..

[13]  M. Sahlins.  Stone Age Economics , 2020 .

[14]  M. Armstrong.  Competition in Two-Sided Markets ¤ , 2005 .

[15]  Chandrasekar Subramaniam,et al.  Determinants of the Choice of Open Source Software License , 2008, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[16]  Namjoo Choi,et al.  An Exploratory Study on the Two New Trends in Open Source Software: End-Users and Service , 2009, 2009 42nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[17]  W. Stam.  When Does Community Participation Enhance the Performance of Open Source Software Companies? , 2008 .

[18]  Arvind K. Tripathi,et al.  Monetary donations to an open source software platform , 2009 .

[19]  Chandrasekar Subramaniam,et al.  Determinants of open source software project success: A longitudinal study , 2009, Decis. Support Syst..

[20]  Robert Sugden,et al.  Reciprocity: The Supply of Public Goods Through Voluntary Contributions , 1984 .

[21]  InduShobha N. Chengalur-Smith,et al.  Sustainability of Free/Libre Open Source Projects: A Longitudinal Study , 2010, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[22]  Michelle Levesque,et al.  Fundamental issues with open source software development , 2004, First Monday.

[23]  A. Gouldner.  THE NORM OF RECIPROCITY: A PRELIMINARY STATEMENT * , 1960 .

[24]  InduShobha N. Chengalur-Smith,et al.  An Empirical Analysis of the Business Value of Open Source Infrastructure Technologies , 2010, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[25]  Stefano Comino,et al.  From Planning to Mature: On the Determinants of Open Source Take-Off , 2007 .

[26]  Chen Zhang,et al.  Emergence of New Project Teams from Open Source Software Developer Networks: Impact of Prior Collaboration Ties , 2008, Inf. Syst. Res..

[27]  M. Perugini,et al.  The personal norm of reciprocity , 2003 .

[28]  Magnus Bergquist,et al.  The power of gifts: organizing social relationships in open source communities , 2001, Inf. Syst. J..

[29]  Eric A. von Hippel,et al.  How Open Source Software Works: 'Free' User-to-User Assistance? , 2000 .

[30]  Josh Lerner,et al.  The Simple Economics of Open Source , 2000 .

[31]  Guido Hertel,et al.  Motivation of software developers in Open Source projects: an Internet-based survey of contributors to the Linux kernel , 2003 .

[32]  Mark A. Schankerman,et al.  The Comingled Code: Open Source and Economic Development , 2010 .

[33]  N. Economides,et al.  COMPETITION AND INTEGRATION AMONG COMPLEMENTS, AND NETWORK MARKET STRUCTURE* , 1992 .

[34]  W. Hauck,et al.  Wald's Test as Applied to Hypotheses in Logit Analysis , 1977 .

[35]  Björn Lundell,et al.  Open source in Swedish companies: where are we? , 2010, Inf. Syst. J..

[36]  Sandeep Krishnamurthy,et al.  Cave or Community? An Empirical Examination of 100 Mature Open Source Projects , 2002, First Monday.

[37]  Kylie J. Veale.  Internet gift economies: Voluntary payment schemes as tangible reciprocity , 2003, First Monday.

[38]  C. Kemerer,et al.  Network Externalities in Microcomputer Software: An Econometric Analysis of the Spreadsheet Market , 2014 .

[39]  Leigh Jin,et al.  Beyond Development: A Research Agenda for Investigating Open Source Software User Communities , 2018 .

[40]  Brian Fitzgerald,et al.  Open Source Software the Trenches: Lessons from a Large-Scale OSS Implementation , 2003, ICIS.

[41]  Brian Fitzgerald,et al.  Developing an information systems infrastructure with open source software , 2004, IEEE Software.

[42]  Ravi Sen,et al.  Waiting for Usable Open Source Software? Don't Hold Your Breath! , 2007, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[43]  Namjoo Choi,et al.  Managing First Impressions of New Open Source Software Projects , 2010, IEEE Software.

[44]  Eric S. Raymond,et al.  Homesteading the Noosphere , 1998, First Monday.

[45]  Netta Iivari,et al.  Introducing Usability Activities into Open Source Software Development Projects – Searching for a Suitable Approach , 2012 .

[46]  Aniruddha S. Gokhale,et al.  Techniques and processes for improving the quality and performance of open-source software , 2006, Softw. Process. Improv. Pract..

[47]  Sherry Emery,et al.  Use of tobacco cessation treatments among young adult smokers: 2005 National Health Interview Survey. , 2007, American journal of public health.

[48]  Arun Sundararajan.  Local Network Effects and Complex Network Structure , 2006 .

[49]  Giorgos Cheliotis,et al.  From open source to open content: Organization, licensing and decision processes in open cultural production , 2009, Decis. Support Syst..

[50]  Namjoo Choi,et al.  An Exploratory Study on the Two New Trends in Open Source Software: End-Users and Service , 2009 .

[51]  Richard M. Stallman,et al.  The GNU manifesto , 1990 .