Scanning Imaging Absorption Spectrometer for Atmospheric Chartography carbon monoxide total columns: Statistical evaluation and comparison with chemistry transport model results

This paper presents a detailed statistical analysis of one year (September 2003 to August 2004) of global Scanning Imaging Absorption Spectrometer for Atmospheric Chartography (SCIAMACHY) carbon monoxide (CO) total column retrievals from the Iterative Maximum Likelihood Method (IMLM) algorithm, version 6.3. SCIAMACHY provides the first solar reflectance measurements of CO and is uniquely sensitive down to the boundary layer. SCIAMACHY measurements and chemistry transport model (CTM) results are compared and jointly evaluated. Significant improvements in agreement occur, especially close to biomass burning emission regions, when the new Global Fire Emissions Database version 2 (GFEDv2) is used with the CTM. Globally, the seasonal variation of the model is very similar to that of the SCIAMACHY measurements. For certain locations, significant differences were found, which are likely related to modeling errors due to CO emission uncertainties. Statistical analysis shows that differences between single SCIAMACHY CO total column measurements and corresponding model results are primarily explained by random instrument noise errors. This strongly suggests that the random instrument noise errors are a good diagnostic for the precision of the measurements. The analysis also indicates that noise in single SCIAMACHY CO measurements is generally greater than actual variations in total columns. It is thus required to average SCIAMACHY data over larger temporal and spatial scales to obtain valuable information. Analyses of monthly averaged SCIAMACHY measurements over 3° × 2° geographical regions indicates that they are of sufficient accuracy to reveal valuable information about spatial and temporal variations in CO columns and provide an important tool for model validation. A large spatial and temporal variation in instrument noise errors exists which shows a close correspondence with the spatial distribution of surface albedo and cloud cover. This large spatial variability is important for the use of monthly and annual mean SCIAMACHY CO total column measurements. The smallest instrument noise errors of monthly mean 3° × 2° SCIAMACHY CO total columns measurements are 0.01 × 1018 molecules/cm2 for high surface albedo areas over the Sahara. Errors in SCIAMACHY CO total column retrievals due to errors other than instrument noise, like cloud cover, calibration, retrieval uncertainties and averaging kernels are estimated to be about 0.05–0.1 × 1018 molecules/cm2 in total. The bias found between model and observations is around 0.05–0.1 1018 molecules/cm2 (or about 5%) which also includes model errors. This thus provides a best estimate of the currently achievable measurement accuracy for SCIAMACHY CO monthly mean averages.

[1]  R. Hoogeveen,et al.  In-flight proton-induced radiation damage to SCIAMACHY’s extended-wavelength InGaAs near-infrared detectors , 2007 .

[2]  Richard G. Derwent,et al.  Multimodel simulations of carbon monoxide: Comparison with observations and projected near‐future changes , 2006 .

[3]  J. Randerson,et al.  Interannual variability in global biomass burning emissions from 1997 to 2004 , 2006 .

[4]  J. F. Meirink,et al.  Evidence for long‐range transport of carbon monoxide in the Southern Hemisphere from SCIAMACHY observations , 2006 .

[5]  M. Deeter,et al.  Satellite-observed pollution from Southern Hemisphere biomass burning. , 2006 .

[6]  Peter Bergamaschi,et al.  Atmospheric carbon gases retrieved from SCIAMACHY by WFM-DOAS: version 0.5 CO and CH 4 and impact of calibration improvements on CO 2 retrieval , 2006 .

[7]  J. Randerson,et al.  Time-dependent inversion estimates of global biomass-burning CO emissions using Measurement of Pollution in the Troposphere (MOPITT) measurements , 2006 .

[8]  J. F. Meirink,et al.  Quantitative analysis of SCIAMACHY carbon monoxide total column measurements , 2006 .

[9]  Peter Bergamaschi,et al.  Carbon Monoxide, Methane and Carbon Dioxide Columns Retrieved from SCIAMACHY by WFM-DOAS: Year 2003 Initial Data Set , 2005 .

[10]  Ilse Aben,et al.  Distinction between clouds and ice/snow covered surfaces in the identification of cloud-free observations using SCIAMACHY PMDs , 2005 .

[11]  Henk Eskes,et al.  Methane Emissions from Sciamachy Observations Sensitivity Analysis of Methane Emissions Derived from Sciamachy Observations through Inverse Modelling Acpd Methane Emissions from Sciamachy Observations , 2022 .

[12]  Kelly Chance,et al.  SCIAMACHY Level 1 data: calibration concept and in-flight calibration , 2005 .

[13]  J. F. Meirink,et al.  The impact of SCIAMACHY near-infrared instrument calibration on CH 4 and CO total columns , 2005 .

[14]  M. Buchwitz,et al.  Initial validation of ENVISAT/SCIAMACHY columnar CO by FTIR profile retrievals at the Ground-Truthing Station Zugspitze , 2005 .

[15]  J. Warner,et al.  Daily global maps of carbon monoxide from NASA's Atmospheric Infrared Sounder , 2005 .

[16]  J. Drummond,et al.  Latitude and altitude variability of carbon monoxide in the Atlantic detected from ship‐borne Fourier transform spectrometry, model, and satellite data , 2005 .

[17]  M. Buchwitz,et al.  Comparisons between SCIAMACHY and ground-based FTIR data for total columns of CO, CH 4 , CO 2 and N 2 O , 2005 .

[18]  Ulrich Platt,et al.  Retrieval of CO from SCIAMACHY onboard ENVISAT : detection of strongly polluted areas and seasonal patterns in global CO abundances , 2017 .

[19]  Wouter Peters,et al.  On the role of hydroxyl radicals in the self-cleansing capacity of the troposphere , 2004 .

[20]  J. Lamarque,et al.  Monthly CO surface sources inventory based on the 2000–2001 MOPITT satellite data , 2004 .

[21]  Merritt N. Deeter,et al.  Assimilation of the 2000–2001 CO MOPITT retrievals with optimized surface emissions , 2004 .

[22]  M. Buchwitz,et al.  Global carbon monoxide as retrieved from SCIAMACHY by WFM-DOAS , 2004 .

[23]  P. Duchatelet,et al.  Increased Northern Hemispheric carbon monoxide burden in the troposphere in 2002 and 2003 detected from the ground and from space , 2004 .

[24]  M. Deeter,et al.  Relationship between Measurements of Pollution in the Troposphere (MOPITT) and in situ observations of CO based on a large‐scale feature sampled during TRACE‐P , 2004 .

[25]  Merritt N. Deeter,et al.  Vertical resolution and information content of CO profiles retrieved by MOPITT , 2004 .

[26]  Jane Liu,et al.  Spatial and temporal variation of MOPITT CO in Africa and South America: A comparison with SHADOZ ozone and MODIS aerosol , 2004 .

[27]  J. Lamarque,et al.  Observations of carbon monoxide and aerosols from the Terra satellite: Northern Hemisphere variability , 2004 .

[28]  Hyo-Suk Lim,et al.  Global and Regional Distribution of Carbon Monoxide from MOPITT: Seasonal Distribution at 700 hPa , 2004, Environmental monitoring and assessment.

[29]  J. Lamarque,et al.  Evaluation of operational radiances for the Measurements of Pollution in the Troposphere (MOPITT) instrument CO thermal band channels , 2004 .

[30]  J. Lamarque,et al.  Validation of Measurements of Pollution in the Troposphere (MOPITT) CO retrievals with aircraft in situ profiles , 2004 .

[31]  Merritt N. Deeter,et al.  Asian Outflow and Trans-Pacific Transport of Carbon Monoxide and Ozone Pollution: An Integrated Satellite, Aircraft, and Model Perspective , 2003 .

[32]  E. Mahieu,et al.  Ground-based FTIR measurements of CO from the Jungfraujoch: characterisation and comparison with in situ surface and MOPITT data , 2003 .

[33]  J. Lamarque,et al.  Evaluation of CO simulations and the analysis of the CO budget for Europe , 2003 .

[34]  P. M. Lang,et al.  Reanalysis of tropospheric CO trends: Effects of the 1997–1998 wildfires , 2003 .

[35]  J. Lamarque,et al.  Operational carbon monoxide retrieval algorithm and selected results for the MOPITT instrument , 2003 .

[36]  Merritt N. Deeter,et al.  Identification of CO plumes from MOPITT data: Application to the August 2000 Idaho‐Montana forest fires , 2003, Geophysical Research Letters.

[37]  John C. Gille,et al.  Inverse modeling of carbon monoxide surface emissions using Climate Monitoring and Diagnostics Laboratory network observations , 2002 .

[38]  A. Segers,et al.  On the use of mass-conserving wind fields in chemistry-transport models , 2002 .

[39]  R. Francey,et al.  Interannual growth rate variations of atmospheric CO2 and its δ13C, H2, CH4, and CO between 1992 and 1999 linked to biomass burning , 2002 .

[40]  Sander Houweling,et al.  Trends and inter-annual variability of methane emissions derived from 1979-1993 global CTM simulations , 2002 .

[41]  Gerhard Wotawa,et al.  Inter‐annual variability of summertime CO concentrations in the Northern Hemisphere explained by boreal forest fires in North America and Russia , 2001 .

[42]  J. Lelieveld,et al.  A 1°×1° resolution data set of historical anthropogenic trace gas emissions for the period 1890–1990 , 2001 .

[43]  K. Taylor.  Summarizing multiple aspects of model performance in a single diagram , 2001 .

[44]  J.G.J. Olivier,et al.  Global emission sources and sinks , 2001 .

[45]  Tracey Holloway,et al.  Global distribution of carbon monoxide , 2000 .

[46]  G. Carmichael,et al.  Impacts of biomass burning on tropospheric CO, NOx, and O3 , 2000 .

[47]  G. Brasseur,et al.  The impact of natural and anthropogenic hydrocarbons on the tropospheric budget of carbon monoxide , 2000 .

[48]  B. Connor,et al.  Intercomparison of remote sounding instruments , 1999 .

[49]  Sander Houweling,et al.  The impact of nonmethane hydrocarbon compounds on tropospheric photochemistry , 1998 .

[50]  Wei Min Hao,et al.  Spatial and temporal distribution of tropical biomass burning , 1994 .