A Unifying Approach to Registration, Segmentation, and Intensity Correction

We present a statistical framework that combines the registration of an atlas with the segmentation of magnetic resonance images. We use an Expectation Maximization-based algorithm to find a solution within the model, which simultaneously estimates image inhomogeneities, anatomical labelmap, and a mapping from the atlas to the image space. An example of the approach is given for a brain structure-dependent affine mapping approach. The algorithm produces high quality segmentations for brain tissues as well as their substructures. We demonstrate the approach on a set of 22 magnetic resonance images. In addition, we show that the approach performs better than similar methods which separate the registration and segmentation problems.

[1]  W. Eric L. Grimson,et al.  An Expectation Maximization Approach for Integrated Registration, Segmentation, and Intensity Correction , 2005 .

[2]  W. Eric L. Grimson,et al.  Anatomical guided segmentation with non-stationary tissue class distributions in an expectation-maximization framework , 2004, 2004 2nd IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: Nano to Macro (IEEE Cat No. 04EX821).

[3]  Baba C. Vemuri,et al.  An Accurate and Efficient Bayesian Method for Automatic Segmentation of Brain MRI , 2002, ECCV.

[4]  W. Eric L. Grimson,et al.  A shape-based approach to the segmentation of medical imagery using level sets , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[5]  William H. Press,et al.  Numerical recipes in C. The art of scientific computing , 1987 .

[6]  Koenraad Van Leemput,et al.  Automated model-based bias field correction of MR images of the brain , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[7]  Daniel Rueckert,et al.  Simultaneous Segmentation and Registration for Medical Image , 2004, MICCAI.

[8]  G. McLachlan,et al.  The EM algorithm and extensions , 1996 .

[9]  Pierre Hellier,et al.  Level Set Methods in an EM Framework for Shape Classification and Estimation , 2004, International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention.

[10]  Patrick Dupont,et al.  Effects of Anatomical Asymmetry in Spatial Priors on Model-Based Segmentation of the Brain MRI: A Validation Study , 2004, MICCAI.

[11]  Wiro J. Niessen,et al.  Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention – MICCAI 2001 , 2001, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[12]  Ron Kikinis,et al.  Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention — MICCAI 2002 , 2002, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[13]  William H. Press,et al.  The Art of Scientific Computing Second Edition , 1998 .

[14]  J. Alison Noble,et al.  MAP MRF Joint Segmentation and Registration , 2002, MICCAI.

[15]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  A fully automatic and robust brain MRI tissue classification method , 2003, Medical Image Anal..

[16]  William H. Press,et al.  Numerical recipes in C , 2002 .

[17]  O. Faugeras,et al.  Statistical shape influence in geodesic active contours , 2002, 5th IEEE EMBS International Summer School on Biomedical Imaging, 2002..

[18]  W. Eric L. Grimson,et al.  Adaptive Segmentation of MRI Data , 1995, CVRMed.

[19]  J.L. Marroquin,et al.  An accurate and efficient Bayesian method for automatic segmentation of brain MRI , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[20]  Ron Kikinis,et al.  A Binary Entropy Measure to Assess Nonrigid Registration Algorithms , 2001, MICCAI.

[21]  W. Eric L. Grimson,et al.  Adaptive Segmentation of MRI Data , 1995, CVRMed.

[22]  A. Dale,et al.  Whole Brain Segmentation Automated Labeling of Neuroanatomical Structures in the Human Brain , 2002, Neuron.

[23]  Nicholas Ayache,et al.  Three-dimensional multimodal brain warping using the Demons algorithm and adaptive intensity corrections , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.