Hashtags for gatekeeping of information on social media

Since the inception of gatekeeping research in the 1940s, most studies on gatekeeping have been human‐centric, treating and studying individuals as gatekeepers, who perform their gatekeeping role using a combination of the following mechanisms: forming communities, and/or broadcasting, discovering‐searching, collecting, organizing, or protecting information. However, the nature of communication channels and how information is produced by and shared with users has fundamentally changed in the last 80 years. One significant change is the growing use of technology‐enabled metadata like hashtags when sharing information on social media. Rarely any study investigates whether hashtags can perform gatekeeping of information and what it means for information gatekeeping. This paper fills in the gap by conducting a content analysis of 77 interdisciplinary studies on hashtags and gatekeeping to confirm how they can implement six gatekeeping mechanisms. This study shows that hashtags expand our understanding of the role of technology solutions in gatekeeping and advance research on hierarchical gatekeeping. The benefits of hashtags for gatekeeping suggest that they act as “information anchors” for online communities, thereby highlighting the utility of information gatekeepers for society.

[1]  Gerald Grow,et al.  Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication , 1982 .

[2]  Dragomir R. Radev,et al.  Rumor has it: Identifying Misinformation in Microblogs , 2011, EMNLP.

[3]  R. Emsley,et al.  #WhyWeTweetMH: Understanding Why People Use Twitter to Discuss Mental Health Problems , 2017, Journal of medical Internet research.

[4]  T. Alter,et al.  Place, Community Development, and Social Capital , 2006 .

[5]  John Agada,et al.  Inner-City Gatekeepers: An Exploratory Survey of Their Information Use Environment , 1999, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[6]  Kristen N Kindrachuk,et al.  Going Viral. , 2015, ACS infectious diseases.

[7]  Mor Naaman,et al.  Why do tagging systems work? , 2006, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[8]  Cheryl Metoyer-Duran,et al.  Information-seeking behavior of gatekeepers in ethnolinguistic communities : overview of a taxonomy , 1991 .

[9]  Lauren H. Mandel,et al.  Chapter 3: The Rural Public Library as Leader in Community Broadband Services , 2011 .

[10]  Efthimis N. Efthimiadis,et al.  Conversational tagging in twitter , 2010, HT '10.

[11]  Yang Lu,et al.  The human in human information acquisition: Understanding gatekeeping and proposing new directions in scholarship , 2007 .

[12]  Mor Naaman,et al.  Fitter with Twitter: Understanding Personal Health and Fitness Activity in Social Media , 2013, ICWSM.

[13]  Rishabh Kaushal,et al.  Towards automated real-time detection of misinformation on Twitter , 2016, 2016 International Conference on Advances in Computing, Communications and Informatics (ICACCI).

[14]  D. Billis Hybrid Organizations and the Third Sector: Challenges for Practice, Theory and Policy , 2010 .

[15]  Aaron W. Clopton,et al.  Re-conceptualizing social anchors in community development: utilizing social anchor theory to create social capital's third dimension , 2011 .

[16]  Matthias Jarke,et al.  Tagging diversity in personal learning environments , 2015, Journal of Computers in Education.

[17]  Sandra Erdelez Information Encountering: It's More Than Just Bumping into Information , 2005 .

[18]  Frank B. Golley,et al.  Paradigm shift , 1989, Landscape Ecology.

[19]  Daren C. Brabham Crowdsourcing , 2013, The MIT Press essential knowledge series.

[20]  Jabra Zarka,et al.  Coronavirus Goes Viral: Quantifying the COVID-19 Misinformation Epidemic on Twitter , 2020, Cureus.

[21]  Rodrigo Costas,et al.  The unbearable emptiness of tweeting—About journal articles , 2017, PloS one.

[22]  P. Bala,et al.  Social media for improved process management in organizations during disasters , 2020 .

[23]  Devendra Potnis,et al.  Measuring e-Governance as an innovation in the public sector , 2010, Gov. Inf. Q..

[24]  Kimberly Chopin,et al.  Finding communities: alternative viewpoints through weblogs and tagging , 2008, J. Documentation.

[25]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Automated analysis of actor–topic networks on twitter: New approaches to the analysis of socio‐semantic networks , 2019, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[26]  Todd Gitlin Media sociology , 1978 .

[27]  Devendra Potnis,et al.  Investigating barriers to “using information” in electronic resources: A study with e‐book users , 2017, ASIST.

[28]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Everyone's an influencer: quantifying influence on twitter , 2011, WSDM '11.

[29]  Philip N. Howard,et al.  Political Bots and the Manipulation of Public Opinion in Venezuela , 2015, ArXiv.

[30]  Adetoun A. Oyelude,et al.  Libraries as the gate: “ways” and “keepers” in the knowledge environment , 2012 .

[31]  J. Raupp,et al.  Gate-keeping and press-government relations: A multigated model of news construction , 2018 .

[32]  Jinsheng Xu,et al.  A Study on Community Formation in Collaborative Tagging Systems , 2008, 2008 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology.

[33]  Rafael L. G. Raimundo,et al.  Gatekeeping Twitter: message diffusion in political hashtags , 2013 .

[34]  Ciro Cattuto,et al.  Dynamical classes of collective attention in twitter , 2011, WWW.

[35]  Jane Klobas,et al.  Identification of technological gatekeepers in the information technology profession , 1995 .

[36]  Karine Nahon,et al.  Toward a theory of network gatekeeping: A framework for exploring information control , 2008, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[37]  Lyle W. Shannon,et al.  Minority Migrants in the Urban Community , 1973 .

[38]  Devendra Potnis,et al.  Factors influencing undergraduate use of e-books: A mixed methods study , 2018 .

[39]  K. Barzilai-Nahon Gatekeeping: A critical review , 2009 .

[40]  Rong Wang,et al.  Hashtags and information virality in networked social movement: Examining hashtag co-occurrence patterns , 2016, Online Inf. Rev..

[41]  Abraham Z. Bass Refining the “Gatekeeper” Concept: A UN Radio Case Study , 1969 .

[42]  J. Du,et al.  Paradigm shift in information research , 2019, ASIST.

[43]  Bing He,et al.  Community-based topic modeling for social tagging , 2010, CIKM.

[44]  T. Taber,et al.  Analysis of Self-Reported Motives for Task-Related Helping: Implications for an Integrated Theory of Helping , 2014 .

[45]  Katia P. Sycara,et al.  Nonnegative Matrix Tri-Factorization with Graph Regularization for Community Detection in Social Networks , 2015, IJCAI.

[46]  Stephen D. Reese,et al.  Mediating the Message in the 21st Century: A Media Sociology Perspective , 2013 .

[47]  Changsheng Xu,et al.  Hashtag-centric Immersive Search on Social Media , 2017, ACM Multimedia.

[48]  C. Anderson,et al.  Mediating the Message in the 21st Century: A Media Sociology Perspective. , 2017 .

[49]  A. Bruns,et al.  Twitter hashtags from ad hoc to calculated publics , 2015 .

[50]  Anupam Joshi,et al.  Faking Sandy: characterizing and identifying fake images on Twitter during Hurricane Sandy , 2013, WWW.

[51]  D. Billis Hybrid Organizations and the Third Sector , 2010 .

[52]  Tamara A. Small WHAT THE HASHTAG? , 2011 .

[53]  K. Lewin Frontiers in Group Dynamics , 1947 .

[54]  Virgílio A. F. Almeida,et al.  "Everything I Disagree With is #FakeNews": Correlating Political Polarization and Spread of Misinformation , 2017, ArXiv.

[55]  Keith Krehbiel,et al.  Gatekeeping , 2005, The Journal of Politics.

[56]  John Agada Inner-city gatekeepers: an exploratory survey of their information use environment , 1999 .

[57]  Harald Schoen,et al.  Small worlds with a difference: new gatekeepers and the filtering of political information on Twitter , 2011, WebSci '11.

[58]  John Riedl,et al.  Nurturing tagging communities , 2009 .

[59]  E. Chatman Information, mass media use and the working poor , 1985 .

[60]  David Miller Ambiguities in the Use of Certain Library of Congress Subject Headings for Form and Genre Access to Moving Image Materials , 1995 .

[61]  InduShobha N. Chengalur-Smith,et al.  The Adoption of IBM's Spoken Web in Information Poor Communities: A Pilot Study with Farmers in Gujarat, India , 2016, 2016 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS).

[62]  Blaise Cronin,et al.  Invisible Colleges and Information Transfer a Review and Commentary with particular Reference to the Social Sciences , 1982, J. Documentation.

[63]  Jeff J. Hemsley Followers Retweet! The Influence of Middle‐Level Gatekeepers on the Spread of Political Information on Twitter , 2019, Policy & Internet.

[64]  Christos Douligeris,et al.  Employing Twitter Hashtags and Linked Data to Suggest Trending Resources in a Digital Library , 2017, TPDL.

[65]  Vandana Singh,et al.  Scenarios of technology use to promote community engagement: Overcoming marginalization and bridging digital divides in the Southern and Central Appalachian rural libraries , 2020, Inf. Process. Manag..

[66]  Rishabh Kaushal,et al.  Improving spam detection in Online Social Networks , 2015, 2015 International Conference on Cognitive Computing and Information Processing(CCIP).

[67]  Rachel Ivy Clarke,et al.  Metadata for diversity , 2019, J. Documentation.

[68]  W. Xu,et al.  Twitter hashtags for health: applying network and content analyses to understand the health knowledge sharing in a Twitter-based community of practice , 2015 .

[69]  T. Maung on in C , 2010 .

[70]  Ann Majchrzak,et al.  Knowledge Collaboration in Online Communities , 2011, Organ. Sci..

[71]  D. Moxley,et al.  Envisioning Libraries as Collaborative Community Anchors for Social Service Provision to Vulnerable Populations , 2016 .

[72]  B. Loader,et al.  What the hashtag? A content analysis of Canadian politics on Twitter TAMARA A . SMALL , 2012 .

[73]  Michele Zappavigna,et al.  Ambient affiliation: A linguistic perspective on Twitter , 2011, New Media Soc..

[74]  K. Barzilai-Nahon Toward a theory of network gatekeeping , 2008 .

[75]  Stephen D. Reese,et al.  A Media Sociology for the Networked Public Sphere: The Hierarchy of Influences Model , 2016 .

[76]  Stefanie Haustein,et al.  Scholarly Twitter metrics , 2018, Springer Handbook of Science and Technology Indicators.