Envy and positional bias in the evolutionary psychology of management

We propose that humans have evolved at least two specialized cognitive adaptations shaped by selection to solve problems associated with resource competition: (1) a positional bias by which individuals judge success in domains that affect fitness in terms of standing relative to their reference group; and (2) envy, an emotion that functions to alert individuals to fitness-relevant advantages enjoyed by rivals and to motivate individuals to acquire those same advantages. We present new data supporting the existence of design features of these hypothesized psychological adaptations and discuss implications for economists, organizations, marketers, and managers. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  W. Hamilton,et al.  Selfish and Spiteful Behaviour in an Evolutionary Model , 1970, Nature.

[2]  R. Thornhill,et al.  The evolution of human sexuality. , 1996, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[3]  X. T. Wang,et al.  Risk as Reproductive Variance , 2002 .

[4]  D. Myers,et al.  Who Is Happy? , 1995 .

[5]  R. Nesse.  Luxury Fever: Why Money Fails to Satisfy in an Era of Excess , 2001 .

[6]  Peter M. Todd,et al.  Fast and frugal heuristics for environmentally bounded minds , 2001 .

[7]  A. Zahavi.  Mate selection-a selection for a handicap. , 1975, Journal of theoretical biology.

[8]  D. Buss,et al.  Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures , 1989, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[9]  D. Buss,et al.  Evolutionary Psychology: A New Paradigm for Psychological Science , 1995 .

[10]  E. Byers,et al.  Dating couples' disagreements over the desired level of sexual intimacy. , 1988, Journal of sex research.

[11]  Sandy Lovie.  How the mind works , 1980, Nature.

[12]  D. Buss.  The Evolution Of Desire: Strategies of Human Mating , 1994 .

[13]  L. Cosmides,et al.  The psychological foundations of culture. , 1992 .

[14]  R. Trivers.  Parental investment and sexual selection , 1972 .

[15]  M. Daly,et al.  Carpe Diem: Adaptation and Devaluing the Future , 2005, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[16]  D. Buss.  The evolution of human intrasexual competition: tactics of mate attraction. , 1988, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[17]  D. Buss,et al.  Conflict between the sexes: strategic interference and the evocation of anger and upset. , 1989, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[18]  P. Gilbert.  Varieties of submissive behavior as forms of social defense: Their evolution and role in depression. , 2000 .

[19]  P. Pye-Smith.  The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex , 1871, Nature.

[20]  R. Dawkins.  The Extended Phenotype , 1982 .

[21]  Rufus A. Johnstone,et al.  Evolution of spite through indirect reciprocity , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[22]  G. Parker,et al.  An evolutionarily stable strategy approach to indiscriminate spite , 1979, Nature.

[23]  D. Singh,et al.  Adaptive significance of female physical attractiveness: role of waist-to-hip ratio. , 1993, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[24]  Moral Sentiments and Material Interests: The Foundations of Cooperation in Economic Life , 2007 .

[25]  Andrew M. Colman,et al.  Moral sentiments and material interests: The foundations of cooperation in economic life , 2006 .

[26]  Arnon Lotem,et al.  Evolution of cooperation between individuals , 1999, Nature.

[27]  Stephen M. Colarelli.  No Best Way: An Evolutionary Perspective on Human Resource Management , 2003 .

[28]  Terry Burnham.  Mean Markets and Lizard Brains: How to Profit from the New Science of Irrationality , 2005 .

[29]  O. D. Duncan.  Does money buy satisfaction , 1975 .

[30]  H. Reeve,et al.  Mating games: the evolution of human mating transactions , 2004 .

[31]  M. Nowak,et al.  Evolution of indirect reciprocity by image scoring , 1998, Nature.

[32]  D. Kenrick,et al.  Age preferences in mates reflect sex differences in human reproductive strategies , 1992, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[33]  M. N,et al.  The Dynamics of Indirect Reciprocity , 1998 .

[34]  D. Bhugra.  Cross-Cultural Aspects of Jealousy , 1993 .

[35]  R. Easterlin.  Will raising the incomes of all increase the happiness of all , 1995 .

[36]  Arnon Lotem,et al.  From reciprocity to unconditional altruism through signalling benefits , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[37]  David Hemenway,et al.  Is more always better?: A survey on positional concerns , 1998 .

[38]  Lawrence S. Sugiyama.  Evolutionary psychology: The new science of the mind , 2001 .

[39]  R. Kurzban,et al.  IS HOMO ECONOMICUS , 2005 .

[40]  Ed Diener,et al.  Happiness of the very wealthy , 1985 .

[41]  K. Sigmund,et al.  Evolution of Indirect Reciprocity by Image Scoring/ The Dynamics of Indirect Reciprocity , 1998 .

[42]  Margo Wilson,et al.  Do pretty women inspire men to discount the future? , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[43]  R. Easterlin.  Does Economic Growth Improve the Human Lot? Some Empirical Evidence , 1974 .

[44]  D. Buss,et al.  Sexual strategies theory: an evolutionary perspective on human mating. , 1993, Psychological review.

[45]  C. Cooper,et al.  On the move : the psychology of change and transition , 1990 .

[46]  Allen I. Huffcutt,et al.  Patterns and Universals of Adult Romantic Attachment Across 62 Cultural Regions , 2004 .

[47]  C. Darwin.  The descent of man, and Selection in relation to sex, Vol 1. , 1871 .

[48]  Elaine Hatfield,et al.  Gender Differences in Receptivity to Sexual Offers , 1989 .

[49]  R A Johnstone,et al.  Eavesdropping and animal conflict , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[50]  O. Leimar,et al.  Evolution of cooperation through indirect reciprocity , 2001, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[51]  A. Oswald,et al.  Satisfaction and comparison income , 1996 .

[52]  G. C. Williams.  Sex and evolution. , 1975, Monographs in population biology.