Integrated tracking and sensor management based on expected information gain

The availability of flexible sensors offers new opportunities for enhanced tracking performance. The management of such sensors must consider their characteristics and the tracking situation picture. Shannon's information measure provides a means of quantifying the potential gains from various sensor deployment options. The problem of tracking targets with an electronically scanned array radar is addressed. The radar can be commanded to conduct surveillance of the search volume in a manner that is analogous to a mechanically scanned radar. In conjunction with the surveillance mode, a revisit mode permits the radar to be commanded to form beams to illuminate a specific volume, such as in the vicinity of a track. An expected information gain is computed based on the probability of detecting the tracked target with the revisit beam, the predicted track uncertainty in the event that the target is not detected, and the expected fused track uncertainty if the target is detected. A high value for the expected information gain occurs when a measurement is likely to yield a significant improvement in the track uncertainty and there is a sufficiently high probability of detecting the target being tracked. Results from implementing the expected information gain in an integrated tracking and radar management system are presented and discussed.

[1]  A. Papandreou-Suppappola,et al.  Energy efficient target tracking in a sensor network using non-myopic sensor scheduling , 2005, 2005 7th International Conference on Information Fusion.

[2]  A. Hero,et al.  INFORMATION-BASED SENSOR MANAGEMENT FOR SIMULTANEOUS MULTITARGET TRACKING AND IDENTIFICATION , 2005 .

[3]  Johannes Wintenby,et al.  Resource Allocation in Airborne Surveillance Radar , 2003 .

[4]  Jason L. Williams,et al.  Information theoretic sensor management , 2007 .

[5]  Kevin J. Sullivan,et al.  An entropy-based approach to wide area surveillance , 2006, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[6]  P. Dodin,et al.  Analysis of the multisensor multitarget tracking resource allocation problem , 2000, Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Information Fusion.

[7]  Chris Kreucher An information-based approach to sensor resource allocation. , 2005 .

[8]  Robin J. Evans,et al.  Variance reduction for Monte Carlo implementation of adaptive sensor management , 2004 .

[9]  Thomas M. Cover,et al.  Elements of Information Theory , 2005 .

[10]  Samuel S. Blackman,et al.  Design and Analysis of Modern Tracking Systems , 1999 .

[11]  Kenneth J. Hintz,et al.  Information theoretic approach to sensor scheduling , 1996, Defense, Security, and Sensing.

[12]  Branko Ristic,et al.  Beyond the Kalman Filter: Particle Filters for Tracking Applications , 2004 .

[13]  Aaas News,et al.  Book Reviews , 1893, Buffalo Medical and Surgical Journal.

[14]  Jim Byrnes,et al.  Advances in Sensing with Security Applications , 2006 .

[15]  Alfred O. Hero,et al.  Information-based sensor management for multitarget tracking , 2004, SPIE Optics + Photonics.

[16]  Ning Xiong,et al.  Multi-sensor management for information fusion: issues and approaches , 2002, Inf. Fusion.

[17]  A. Hero,et al.  Efficient methods of non-myopic sensor management for multitarget tracking , 2004, 2004 43rd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC) (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37601).

[18]  Paul E. Berry,et al.  On the use of entropy for optimal radar resource management and control , 2003, 2003 Proceedings of the International Conference on Radar (IEEE Cat. No.03EX695).

[19]  Wayne W. Schmaedeke Information-based sensor management , 1993, Defense, Security, and Sensing.