Predicting magnetopause crossings at geosynchronous orbit during the Halloween storms

[1] In late October and early November of 2003, the Sun unleashed a powerful series of events known as the Halloween storms. The coronal mass ejections launched by the Sun produced several severe compressions of the magnetosphere that moved the magnetopause inside of geosynchronous orbit. Such events are of interest to satellite operators, and the ability to predict magnetopause crossings along a given orbit is an important space weather capability. In this paper we compare geosynchronous observations of magnetopause crossings during the Halloween storms to crossings determined from the Lyon-Fedder-Mobarry global magnetohydrodynamic simulation of the magnetosphere as well to predictions of several empirical models of the magnetopause position. We calculate basic statistical information about the predictions as well as several standard skill scores. We find that the current Lyon-Fedder-Mobarry simulation of the storm provides a slightly better prediction of the magnetopause position than the empirical models we examined for the extreme conditions present in this study. While this is not surprising, given that conditions during the Halloween storms were well outside the parameter space of the empirical models, it does point out the need for physics-based models that can predict the effects of the most extreme events that are of significant interest to users of space weather forecasts.

[1]  A. H. Murphy,et al.  What Is a Good Forecast? An Essay on the Nature of Goodness in Weather Forecasting , 1993 .

[2]  A. Suvorova,et al.  Geosynchronous magnetopause crossings on October 29–31, 2003 , 2004 .

[3]  Christopher T. Russell,et al.  An empirical model of the size and shape of the near-earth magnetotail , 1993 .

[4]  L. Lanzerotti Space Weather's Time Has Come , 2003 .

[5]  J. Lyon,et al.  Magnetopause erosion: A global view from MHD simulation , 2003 .

[6]  Hideaki Kawano,et al.  Magnetopause location under extreme solar wind conditions , 1998 .

[7]  C. Russell,et al.  Comparison of three magnetopause prediction models under extreme solar wind conditions , 2001 .

[8]  A. Dmitriev,et al.  Geosynchronous magnetopause crossings on 29–31 October 2003 , 2005 .

[9]  C. Russell,et al.  Near-Earth magnetotail shape and size as determined from the magnetopause flaring angle , 1996 .

[10]  A. Dmitriev,et al.  Dawn‐dusk asymmetry of geosynchronous magnetopause crossings , 2004 .

[11]  C. Russell,et al.  Toward predicting the position of the magnetopause within geosynchronous orbit , 2000 .

[12]  D. Baker,et al.  Physical models of the geospace radiation environment , 2004 .

[13]  M. Hudson,et al.  Towards an integrated model of the space weather system , 2004 .

[14]  Christopher T. Russell,et al.  A new functional form to study the solar wind control of the magnetopause size and shape , 1997 .

[15]  C. Rufenach,et al.  A study of geosynchronous magnetopause crossings , 1989 .

[16]  Harlan E. Spence,et al.  Center for integrated space weather modeling metrics plan and initial model validation results , 2004 .

[17]  J. Lyon,et al.  Solar wind-magnetosphere energy coupling under extreme interplanetary conditions: MHD simulations , 2000 .

[18]  Michael J. Carlowicz,et al.  Storms from the Sun , 2004 .

[19]  David G. Sibeck,et al.  Magnetopause shape as a bivariate function of interplanetary magnetic field Bz and solar wind dynamic pressure , 1993 .

[20]  Charles C. Goodrich,et al.  Initial results from the coupled magnetosphere ionosphere thermosphere model: magnetospheric and ionospheric responses , 2004 .

[21]  George L. Siscoe,et al.  A Culture of Improving Forecasts: Lessons From Meteorology , 2006 .

[22]  D. Baker,et al.  Sun Unleashes Halloween Storm , 2004 .

[23]  C. C. Goodricha,et al.  The CISM code coupling strategy , 2004 .

[24]  Harlan E. Spence,et al.  Roles of empirical modeling within CISM , 2004 .

[25]  John Lyon,et al.  The Lyon-Fedder-Mobarry (LFM) global MHD magnetospheric simulation code , 2004 .