Equivalent Damping in Support of Direct Displacement-Based Design

The concept of equivalent linearization of nonlinear system response as applied to direct displacement-based design is evaluated. Until now, Jacobsen's equivalent damping approach combined with the secant stiffness method has been adopted for the linearization process in direct displacement-based design. Four types of hysteretic models and a catalog of 100 ground motion records were considered. The evaluation process revealed significant errors in approximating maximum inelastic displacements due to overestimation of the equivalent damping values in the intermediate to long period range. Conversely, underestimation of the equivalent damping led to overestimation of displacements in the short period range, in particular for effective periods less than 0.4 seconds. The scatter in the results ranged between 20% and 40% as a function of ductility. New equivalent damping relations for four structural systems, based upon nonlinear system ductility and maximum displacement, are proposed. The accuracy of the new equivalent damping relations is assessed, yielding a significant reduction of the error in predicting inelastic displacements. Minimal improvement in the scatter of the results was achieved, however. While many significant studies have been conducted on equivalent damping over the last 40 years, this study has the following specific aims: (1) identify the scatter associated with Jacobsen's equivalent damping combined with the secant stiffness as utilized in Direct Displacement-Based Design; and (2) improve the accuracy of the Direct Displacement-Based Design approach by providing alternative equivalent damping expressions.

[1]  Mervyn J. Kowalsky,et al.  A displacement‐based approach for the seismic design of continuous concrete bridges , 2002 .

[2]  Julian J. Bommer,et al.  Scaling of spectral displacement ordinates with damping ratios , 2005 .

[3]  Mete A. Sozen,et al.  SUBSTITUTE-STRUCTURE METHOD FOR SEISMIC DESIGN IN R/C , 1976 .

[4]  Paul C. Jennings,et al.  Equivalent Viscous Damping for Yielding Structures , 1968 .

[5]  M. J. Nigel Priestley,et al.  Myths and fallacies in earthquake engineering , 1993 .

[6]  Andrew S. Whittaker,et al.  Evaluation of Simplified Methods of Analysis of Yielding Structures with Damping Systems , 2002 .

[7]  Gian Michele Calvi,et al.  Displacement-based seismic design of multi-degree-of-freedom bridge structures , 1995 .

[8]  Mervyn J. Kowalsky,et al.  Direct displacement-based seismic design of concrete buildings , 2000 .

[9]  Mjn Priestley,et al.  Myths and Fallacies in Earthquake Engineering--Conflicts Between Design and Reality , 1995, SP-157: Recent Developments In Lateral Force Transfer In Buildings.

[10]  Mervyn J. Kowalsky,et al.  RC STRUCTURAL WALLS DESIGNED ACCORDING TO UBC AND DISPLACEMENT-BASED METHODS , 2001 .

[11]  T. Takeda,et al.  Reinforced Concrete response to simulated earthquakes , 1970 .

[12]  Anil K. Chopra,et al.  Direct Displacement-Based Design: Use of Inelastic vs. Elastic Design Spectra , 2001 .

[13]  E. Faccioli,et al.  Displacement Spectra for Long Periods , 2004 .

[14]  Wilfred D. Iwan,et al.  The effective period and damping of a class of hysteretic structures , 1979 .

[15]  Sarah L. Billington,et al.  Influence of Hysteretic Behavior on Equivalent Period and Damping of Structural Systems , 2003 .

[16]  Ismael Herrera,et al.  On a Kind of Hysteretic Damping , 1964 .

[17]  M. Sozen,et al.  Inelastic Responses of Reinforced ConcreteStructure to Earthquake Motions , 1974 .

[18]  Eduardo Miranda,et al.  Evaluation of approximate methods to estimate maximum inelastic displacement demands , 2002 .