‘Keeping our Faith Alive’: Investigating Buddhism Practice during COVID-19 to Inform Design for the Online Community Practice of Faith

Supportive digital technologies for the community practice of Faith remain relatively under-explored in Human Computer Interaction (HCI). We report on interviews with 12 members of a Buddhist community in the UK who self-organized and used video-conferencing tools to remain connected to their faith community during the COVID-19 pandemic, aiming to understand how they adopted online tools for their practice while shaping new collective experiences. Findings from Reflexive Thematic Analysis were combined with autoethnographic insights from the first author, also a community member. We evidence qualities of the practice that were valued by participants before and during the pandemic, and the limitations of existing tools and screen-based interactions. We contribute empirical insights on mediated religious and spiritual practice, advancing HCI discourses on Techno-Spirituality, Tangible Embodied Interaction, Soma Design and More-than-Human Worlds. We further develop design considerations for enriching spiritual experiences that are meaningful to practitioners in communities of faith.

[1]  Simon Luthe,et al.  Co-imagining participatory design in religious and spiritual contexts , 2022, NordiCHI.

[2]  Janne Mascha Beuthel,et al.  Exploring Remote Communication through Design Interventions: Material and Bodily Considerations , 2022, NordiCHI.

[3]  William W. Gaver,et al.  Yo–Yo Machines: Self-Build Devices that Support Social Connections During the Pandemic , 2022, CHI.

[4]  Stephanie M. Wilson,et al.  “Just Not Together”: The Experience of Videoconferencing for People with Aphasia during the Covid-19 Pandemic , 2022, CHI.

[5]  Teresa K. O'Leary,et al.  Community Dynamics in Technospiritual Interventions: Lessons Learned from a Church-based mHealth Pilot , 2022, CHI.

[6]  Ilona Nord,et al.  Spirituality at the Breakfast Table: Experiences of Christian Online Worship Services , 2022, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[7]  Elizabeth A. Buie,et al.  Integrating Religion, Faith, and Spirituality in HCI , 2022, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[8]  D. Chatting,et al.  Zoom Obscura: Counterfunctional Design for Video-Conferencing , 2022, CHI.

[9]  Ekaterina R. Stepanova,et al.  Strategies for Fostering a Genuine Feeling of Connection in Technologically Mediated Systems , 2022, CHI.

[10]  Ali Mazalek,et al.  Together Alone: A Tangible Online Narrative , 2022, TEI.

[11]  J. V. van Dijk.  Zooming in on embodied social sensemaking: Mapping the design space in the context of videoconferencing , 2022, Sixteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction.

[12]  J. I. Koh.  Exploring Embodied Gestures and Video Filters for More Expressive Virtual Group Meeting Interactions , 2022, TEI.

[13]  Melissa Forbes.  Thematic analysis: A practical guide , 2021, Evaluation Journal of Australasia.

[14]  Anne Marie Piper,et al.  The Future of Care Work: Towards a Radical Politics of Care in CSCW Research and Practice , 2021, CSCW Companion.

[15]  Loren Terveen,et al.  Sway Together, Stay Together: Visualizing Spiritual Support Networks Through the SoulGarden Prototype , 2021, CSCW Companion.

[16]  Michael Neff,et al.  Videoconference and Embodied VR: Communication Patterns Across Task and Medium , 2021, Proc. ACM Hum. Comput. Interact..

[17]  P. Lodha,et al.  Social Connectedness, Excessive Screen Time During COVID-19 and Mental Health: A Review of Current Evidence , 2021, Frontiers in Human Dynamics.

[18]  Christopher Shamburg,et al.  When school bells last rung: New Jersey schools and the reaction to COVID-19 , 2021, Educ. Inf. Technol..

[19]  L. Francis,et al.  The pandemic and the feminisation of the Church? How male and female churchgoers experienced the Church of England’s response to Covid-19 , 2021, Journal of Beliefs & Values.

[20]  Samia Ibtasam.  For God’s sake! Considering Religious Beliefs in HCI Research : A Case of Islamic HCI , 2021, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[21]  Chiwon Lee,et al.  Social VR as the New Normal?: Understanding User Interactions for the Business Arena , 2021, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[22]  Sarah Homewood,et al.  Tracing Conceptions of the Body in HCI: From User to More-Than-Human , 2021, CHI.

[23]  Scott R. Klemmer,et al.  “It Feels Like I am Talking into a Void”: Understanding Interaction Gaps in Synchronous Online Classrooms , 2021, CHI.

[24]  Loren Terveen,et al.  What is Spiritual Support and How Might It Impact the Design of Online Communities? , 2021, Proc. ACM Hum. Comput. Interact..

[25]  Manfred Tscheligi,et al.  Experiencing Distance: Wearable Engagements with Remote Relationships , 2021, TEI.

[26]  Jonna Häkkilä,et al.  Exploring wearable technology for supporting couples in long-distance relationships , 2020, DRS2020: Synergy.

[27]  Svetlana Yarosh,et al.  "I Cannot Do All of This Alone" , 2020, ACM Trans. Comput. Hum. Interact..

[28]  B. Ferrell,et al.  The Urgency of Spiritual Care: COVID-19 and the Critical Need for Whole-Person Palliation , 2020, Journal of Pain and Symptom Management.

[29]  Ann Light,et al.  Expanding Participation to Design with More-Than-Human Concerns , 2020, PDC.

[30]  Svetlana Yarosh,et al.  "I Cannot Do All of This Alone": Exploring Instrumental and Prayer Support in Online Health Communities , 2020, ArXiv.

[31]  Elizabeth Stowell,et al.  Investigating Opportunities for Crowdsourcing in Church-Based Health Interventions: A Participatory Design Study , 2020, CHI.

[32]  Yulia Brazauskayte,et al.  Undῠla: Embodied Mediated Communication via Coordinated Movement , 2020, TEI.

[33]  Jon E. Froehlich,et al.  Autoethnography of a Hard of Hearing Traveler , 2019, ASSETS.

[34]  Elizabeth A. Buie.  Let Us Say What We Mean: Towards Operational Definitions for Techno-Spirituality Research , 2019, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[35]  Thecla Schiphorst,et al.  The somatic turn in human-computer interaction , 2018, Interactions.

[36]  Masahiko Inami,et al.  SenseCenser: an Interactive Device for Sensing Incense Smoke & Supporting Memorialization Rituals in Japan , 2018, Conference on Designing Interactive Systems.

[37]  Ann Light,et al.  Designing for Everyday Care in Communities , 2018, Conference on Designing Interactive Systems.

[38]  Andrés Lucero,et al.  Living Without a Mobile Phone: An Autoethnography , 2018, Conference on Designing Interactive Systems.

[39]  A. Escobar.  Designs for the Pluriverse: Radical Interdependence, Autonomy, and the Making of Worlds , 2018 .

[40]  Kristina Höök,et al.  Embracing First-Person Perspectives in Soma-Based Design , 2018, Informatics.

[41]  Madina Tlostanova,et al.  On decolonizing design , 2017 .

[42]  Ali Mazalek,et al.  Sensing History: Contextualizing Artifacts with Sensory Interactions and Narrative Design , 2016, Conference on Designing Interactive Systems.

[43]  Jo-Anne Bichard,et al.  Ritual Machines I & II: Making Technology at Home , 2016, CHI.

[44]  Yoko Akama,et al.  Being awake to Ma: designing in between-ness as a way of becoming with , 2015 .

[45]  Alessandro Soro,et al.  The Messaging Kettle: Prototyping Connection over a Distance between Adult Children and Older Parents , 2015, CHI.

[46]  Ann Light,et al.  Towards Mindfulness: Between a Detour and a Portal , 2015, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[47]  Elizabeth A. Buie,et al.  Spirituality: there's an app for that! (but not a lot of research) , 2013, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[48]  Nicola J. Bidwell,et al.  Toward an Afro-Centric Indigenous HCI Paradigm , 2013, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[49]  Mj Marina Toeters,et al.  Research through design , 2012 .

[50]  Xuan Wang,et al.  CoDine: an interactive multi-sensory system for remote dining , 2011, UbiComp '11.

[51]  M. Six Silberman,et al.  When the implication is not to design (technology) , 2011, CHI.

[52]  Arthur P. Bochner,et al.  Autoethnography: An Overview , 2010 .

[53]  Susan Wyche.  Investigating religion and computing: a case for using standpoint theory in technology evaluation studies , 2010 .

[54]  Peter C. Wright,et al.  The prayer companion: openness and specificity, materiality and spirituality , 2010, CHI.

[55]  Rebecca E. Grinter,et al.  Extraordinary computing: religion as a lens for reconsidering the home , 2009, CHI.

[56]  Jay Melican,et al.  The Digital and the Divine: Taking a Ritual View of Communication and ICT Interaction , 2007, HCI.

[57]  Tobie Kerridge,et al.  The Curious Home , 2007 .

[58]  Gilad Lotan,et al.  “Impulse” , 2007, IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law.

[59]  Rebecca E. Grinter,et al.  Technology in spiritual formation: an exploratory study of computer mediated religious communications , 2006, CSCW '06.

[60]  Genevieve Bell,et al.  No More SMS from Jesus: Ubicomp, Religion and Techno-spiritual Practices , 2006, UbiComp.

[61]  Emmanuel Munguia Tapia,et al.  AltarNation: interface design for meditative communities , 2002, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[62]  Michael J. Muller,et al.  Can we have spiritual experiences on-line? , 2000, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[63]  Tulimevava K. Mufeti,et al.  Social Network Platforms and the Oshiwambo Practice of Eengano , 2021, Resilience, Entrepreneurship and ICT.

[64]  Rachel Clarke,et al.  More-than-human participation: design for sustainable smart city futures , 2019, Interactions.

[65]  L. Kazembe,et al.  Leaving No One Behind , 2021, Adolescents in Humanitarian Crisis.

[66]  Arrow Buttons.  Frequently asked questions , 2009 .

[67]  William W. Gaver,et al.  Feather, Scent, and Shaker: Supporting Simple Intimacy , 1996 .