Improving resilience in intermodal transport operations in seaports: a gaming approach

AbstractSeaports are crucial interfaces in global intermodal freight transportation networks. Their complex operations, connectedness to external stakeholders, and increasing volumes of goods to be handled make them vulnerable to internal and external disruptions. Research has shown that disruptions in seaports can cause undesirable ripple effects, which negatively impact the operations of the entire transportation network as well as the surrounding economical and societal well-being. Containerized transportation plays a major role in the global trade network. Resilience of seaport container terminals is therefore imperative for a resilient and robust intermodal transportation network. Communication, information sharing, alignment of plans, and shared awareness of unfolding disruptions among planners and decision makers within terminal operations have been identified as important elements to improve the resilience of container terminals. However, in practice, the inter-dependencies between various planning and operational activities, and alignment of solution strategies have been largely overlooked. Addressing this gap, a novel approach for creating awareness of potential strategies for disruption management by training competencies for resilient container terminal operations has been introduced in the form of a simulation game. Several test sessions of a multi-player tabletop game support the following two findings—first, the simulation game can be a useful means to train competencies for resilient transport operations from the perspective of the future planners and decision makers, as well as for soon-to-be professionals in container terminals. Second, the game may help participants to make choices that lead to resilient transport operations in container terminals.

[1]  Jin Wang,et al.  Decision support framework for risk management on sea ports and terminals using fuzzy set theory and evidential reasoning approach , 2012, Expert Syst. Appl..

[2]  Göran Svensson,et al.  A conceptual framework for the analysis of vulnerability in supply chains , 2000 .

[3]  Francesco Longo Supply chain security: an integrated framework for container terminal facilities , 2012, Int. J. Simul. Process. Model..

[4]  Yossi Sheffi,et al.  The Resilient Enterprise: Overcoming Vulnerability for Competitive Advantage , 2005 .

[5]  G.P. O'Reilly,et al.  Infrastructure simulations of disaster scenarios , 2004, 11th International Telecommunications Network Strategy and Planning Symposium. NETWORKS 2004,.

[6]  Gerhardt Muller,et al.  INTERMODAL FREIGHT TRANSPORTATION , 1999 .

[7]  Jennifer Blackhurst,et al.  The Severity of Supply Chain Disruptions: Design Characteristics and Mitigation Capabilities , 2007, Decis. Sci..

[8]  Nils Kemme,et al.  Design and Operation of Automated Container Storage Systems , 2012 .

[9]  Shalini Kurapati,et al.  Exploring shared situational awareness in supply chain disruptions , 2013, ISCRAM.

[10]  Stefan Voß,et al.  Container terminal operation and operations research - a classification and literature review , 2004, OR Spectr..

[11]  Erik Hollnagel,et al.  Resilience Engineering in Practice: A Guidebook , 2012 .

[12]  J. L. Cavinato Supply chain logistics risks: From the back room to the board room , 2004 .

[13]  Shigeo TAKAHASHI,et al.  Urgent Survey for 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake and Tsunami Disaster in Ports and Coasts-PartI(Tsunami) , 2011 .

[14]  René Schumann,et al.  Coordination of Interdependent Planning Systems, a Case Study , 2007, GI Jahrestagung.

[15]  Thai,et al.  The role of ports in supply chain disruption management , 2011 .

[16]  Gerald R. Ford,et al.  Comparative Advantage, Economic Growth, The Gains from Trade and Globalization, and Computational Trade Modeling: Festschrift Papers in Honor of Alan V. Deardorff , 2010 .

[17]  R. Asariotis,et al.  Review of Maritime Transport, 2014 , 2010 .

[18]  Geertje Bekebrede,et al.  Experiencing Complexity: A gaming approach for understanding infrastructure systems , 2010 .

[19]  Stefan Voß,et al.  Container terminal operation and operations research — a classification and literature review , 2004 .

[20]  Steven C. Gold,et al.  Developments in Business Gaming , 2009 .

[21]  Hui Shan Loh The role of ports in supply chain disruption management , 2015 .

[22]  Ulla Tapaninen,et al.  Transport vulnerabilities and critical industries: experiences from a Finnish stevedore strike , 2011 .

[23]  R. Duke,et al.  Policy games for strategic management , 2004 .

[24]  Joost R. Santos,et al.  International Trade Inoperability Input‐Output Model (IT‐IIM): Theory and Application , 2009, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[25]  Sidney Dekker,et al.  Training organizational resilience in escalating situations , 2010 .

[26]  M. Van Os Using gaming as a data collection tool to design rules for agents in agent-based models - A design framework. , 2012 .

[27]  R. Asariotis,et al.  Review of Maritime Transport, 2008 , 2008 .

[28]  Mark Duncan Air Transportation Security , 2006 .

[29]  S. Meijer The Organisation of Transactions: Studying Supply Networks Using Gaming Simulation , 2009 .

[30]  Igor S. Mayer,et al.  The Gaming of Policy and the Politics of Gaming: A Review , 2009 .

[31]  Richard D. Duke,et al.  A Paradigm for Game Design , 1980 .

[32]  Jan H. G. Klabbers,et al.  A framework for artifact assessment and theory testing , 2006 .

[33]  G. I. Gibbs Handbook of games and simulation exercises , 1974 .