Variation in palatability and biochemical traits within and among eleven beef muscles.

The objective of this study was to determine the extent of variation in, and relationships among, biochemical and palatability traits within and among 11 major beef muscles. Longissimus thoracis et lumborum (LD), psoas major (PM), gluteus medius (GM), semimembranosus (SM), adductor (AD), biceps femoris (BF), semitendinosus (ST), rectus femoris (RF), triceps brachii (TB), infraspinatus (IS), and supraspinatus (SS) from one side of 31 Charolais x MARC III steer carcasses were vacuum-packaged, stored at 2 degrees C until 14 d postmortem, and then frozen at -30 degrees C. The 2.54-cm-thick steaks were obtained from two or three locations within muscles in order to assess biochemical traits and Warner-Bratzler shear force, and from near the center for sensory trait evaluation. The PM was most tender and was followed by IS in both shear force and tenderness rating (P < 0.05). The other muscles were not ranked the same by shear force and tenderness rating. The BF had the lowest (P < 0.05) tenderness rating. The PM, GM, and LD had lower (P < 0.05) collagen concentration (2.7 to 4.5 mg/g muscle) than muscles from the chuck and round (5.9 to 9.0 mg/g), except for the AD (4.9 mg/g). Desmin proteolysis was highest (P < 0.05) for BF and LD (60.7 and 60.1% degraded), and was lowest (P < 0.05) for PM (20.2%). The PM, TB, IS, RF, and ST had relatively long sarcomere lengths (> 2.1 microm), whereas the GM had the shortest (P < 0.05) sarcomere length (1.7 microm). Cooking loss was lowest (P < 0.05) for BF (18.7%) and was followed by LD and IS (20.7%); it was highest (P < 0.05) for ST (27.4%). Across all muscles, tenderness rating was highly correlated (r > 0.60) with shear force, connective tissue rating, sarcomere length, and collagen content. Within a muscle, correlations among all traits were generally highest in LD and lowest in AD. Within muscle, location effects were detected (P < 0.05) for shear force (PM, ST, BF, SM, and RF), sarcomere length (PM, ST, BF, LD, SS, IS, SM, and RF), collagen concentration (PM, BF, SS, IS, SM. AD, TB, and RF), desmin degradation (PM, GM, BF, SM, AD, and, RF), and cooking loss (all muscles except SS and AD). There is a large amount of variation within and among muscles for tenderness traits and tenderness-related biochemical traits. These results increase our understanding of the sources of variation in tenderness in different muscles and provide a basis for the development of muscle-specific strategies for improving the quality and value of muscles.

[1]  S. Shackelford,et al.  Technical note: Sampling methodology for relating sarcomere length, collagen concentration, and the extent of postmortem proteolysis to beef and pork longissimus tenderness. , 2002, Journal of animal science.

[2]  S. Shackelford,et al.  The effects of Piedmontese inheritance and myostatin genotype on the palatability of longissimus thoracis, gluteus medius, semimembranosus, and biceps femoris. , 2001, Journal of animal science.

[3]  J. O. Reagan,et al.  Consumer impressions of Tender Select beef. , 2001, Journal of animal science.

[4]  T. Schroeder,et al.  In‐Store Valuation of Steak Tenderness , 2001 .

[5]  M. Dikeman,et al.  Evaluation of electric belt grill, forced-air convection oven, and electric broiler cookery methods for beef tenderness research. , 2001, Meat science.

[6]  S. Shackelford,et al.  Relationship of beef longissimus tenderness classes to tenderness of gluteus medius, semimembranosus, and biceps femoris. , 2000, Journal of animal science.

[7]  D. S. Hale,et al.  National Beef Tenderness Survey-1998. , 2000, Journal of animal science.

[8]  S. Shackelford,et al.  Variation in proteolysis, sarcomere length, collagen content, and tenderness among major pork muscles. , 2000, Journal of animal science.

[9]  T. Wheeler,et al.  The extent of proteolysis is independent of sarcomere length in lamb longissimus and psoas major. , 1999, Journal of animal science.

[10]  S. Shackelford,et al.  Cooking and palatability traits of beef longissimus steaks cooked with a belt grill or an open hearth electric broiler. , 1998, Journal of animal science.

[11]  J. O. Reagan,et al.  Beef customer satisfaction: role of cut, USDA quality grade, and city on in-home consumer ratings. , 1998, Journal of animal science.

[12]  S. Shackelford,et al.  Repeatability of tenderness measurements in beef round muscles. , 1997, Journal of animal science.

[13]  H R Cross,et al.  Consumer evaluation of beef of known categories of tenderness. , 1997, Journal of animal science.

[14]  M. Doumit,et al.  Meat toughening does not occur when rigor shortening is prevented. , 1996, Journal of animal science.

[15]  C. Ho,et al.  Effect of electrical stimulation on postmortem titin, nebulin, desmin, and troponin-T degradation and ultrastructural changes in bovine longissimus muscle. , 1996, Journal of animal science.

[16]  S. Lonergan,et al.  A muscle hypertrophy condition in lamb (callipyge): characterization of effects on muscle growth and meat quality traits. , 1995, Journal of animal science.

[17]  S. Shackelford,et al.  Relationship between shear force and trained sensory panel tenderness ratings of 10 major muscles from Bos indicus and Bos taurus cattle. , 1995, Journal of animal science.

[18]  D. S. Hale,et al.  National Beef Quality Audit-1995: survey of producer-related defects and carcass quality and quantity attributes. , 1993, Journal of animal science.

[19]  M. Koohmaraie,et al.  The role of Ca(2+)-dependent proteases (calpains) in post mortem proteolysis and meat tenderness. , 1992, Biochimie.

[20]  D. S. Hale,et al.  National beef tenderness survey. , 1991, Journal of animal science.

[21]  J. Fritz,et al.  Changes in Titin and Nebulin in Postmortem Bovine Muscle Revealed by Gel Electrophoresis, Western Blotting and Immunofluorescence Microscopy , 1991 .

[22]  J. Crouse,et al.  Postmortem proteolysis in longissimus muscle from beef, lamb and pork carcasses. , 1991, Journal of animal science.

[23]  S. Seideman,et al.  VARIATIONS IN THE SENSORY PROPERTIES OF BEEF AS AFFECTED BY SEX CONDITION, MUSCLE AND POSTMORTEM AGING , 1989 .

[24]  T. R. Dutson,et al.  Factors associated with the tenderness of three bovine muscles. , 1988 .

[25]  M. Marchello,et al.  Muscle Tenderness, Other Carcass Traits and the Effect of Crossbreeding on These Traits in Beef Cattle , 1985 .

[26]  T. R. Carr,et al.  Chemical and Sensory Properties of Thirteen Major Beef Muscles , 1985 .

[27]  H. B. Hedrick,et al.  PROFILE OF FIBER TYPES AND RELATED PROPERTIES OF FIVE BOVINE MUSCLES , 1977 .

[28]  P. V. Harris,et al.  A COMPARISON OF THE EFFECTS OF AGING, CONDITIONING AND SKELETAL RESTRAINT ON THE TENDERNESS OF MUTTON , 1973 .

[29]  H. Cross,et al.  EFFECTS OF INTRAMUSCULAR COLLAGEN AND ELASTIN ON BOVINE MUSCLE TENDERNESS , 1973 .

[30]  H. B. Hedrick,et al.  Beef muscle tenderness as influenced by days on feed, sex, maturity and anatomical location. , 1970 .

[31]  R. Cassens,et al.  Zinc content and subcellular distribution in red vs. white porcine skeletal muscle. , 1967, American Journal of Physiology.

[32]  R. Cassens,et al.  Further Studies on Bovine Muscle Tenderness as Influenced by Carcass Position, Sarcomere Length, and Fiber Diameter , 1965 .

[33]  R. H. Locker DEGREE OF MUSCULAR CONTRACTION AS A FACTOR IN TENDERNESS OF BEEF , 1960 .

[34]  M. Dikeman,et al.  Sensory evaluation of beef-flavor-intensity, tenderness, and juiciness among major muscles. , 1995, Meat science.

[35]  M. Koohmaraie,et al.  Muscle proteinases and meat aging. , 1994, Meat science.

[36]  L. Ringer,et al.  Evaluation of the Tenderness of Beef Top Sirloin Steaks , 1992 .

[37]  M. Koohmaraie Inhibition of postmortem tenderization in ovine carcasses through infusion of zinc. , 1990 .

[38]  P. V. Harris,et al.  Effect of Animal Age on the Tenderness of Selected Beef Muscles , 1990 .

[39]  H. Fitzhugh,et al.  EFFECT OF CARCASS SUSPENSION ON SARCOMERE LENGTH AND SHEAR FORCE OF SOME MAJOR BOVINE MUSCLES , 1972 .

[40]  G. Guroff,et al.  A NEUTRAL, CALCIUM-ACTIVATED PROTEINASE FROM THE SOLUBLE FRACTION OF RAT BRAIN. , 1964, The Journal of biological chemistry.