Understanding team coordination in doubles table tennis: Joint analysis of first- and third-person data

Abstract Objectives This study sought to determine whether combining first- and third-person methodologies would provide insight into team coordination. Design and methods We studied the activity of a table tennis doubles team during an official match. We collected and processed the verbal data according to a procedure defined for course-of-experience analysis, but we also included a video-based field study of the partners' interactions during the breaks between points. We then conducted a joint analysis of the two players' lived experience and behaviors during these short breaks. Results The results showed both the difficulties and the empirical richness of this approach. For example, the joint analysis of first- and third-person data on doubles table tennis revealed how the players' behaviors during the short breaks between points had a key role in shaping the understanding shared by the two partners. Conclusions The combination of first- and third-person data seems to be a promising approach for improving our understanding of the coordination processes in sports teams. In our study, the joint analysis of these data enabled us to describe in great detail how the respective behaviors of the partners contributed to the dynamics of constructing/deconstructing shared understanding between them.

[1]  F. Varela,et al.  First-person methodologies: What, why, how? , 1999 .

[2]  C. Goodwin.  The Interactive Construction of a Sentence in Natural Conversation , 1979 .

[3]  David W. Eccles,et al.  A Social‐Cognitive Perspective on Team Functioning in Sport , 2012 .

[4]  C. Goodwin.  Action and embodiment within situated human interaction , 2000 .

[5]  E. Hutchins.  Cognition in the wild , 1995 .

[6]  C. Goodwin.  Restarts, Pauses, and the Achievement of a State of Mutual Gaze at Turn‐Beginning , 1980 .

[7]  D. Chalmers,et al.  How can we construct a science of consciousness? , 2013, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[8]  Claire Petitmengin,et al.  Describing one’s subjective experience in the second person: An interview method for the science of consciousness , 2006 .

[9]  Andy Clark,et al.  Visual Awareness and Visuomotor Action , 1999 .

[10]  C. Goodwin.  Conversational Organization: Interaction Between Speakers and Hearers , 1981 .

[11]  J Bourbousson,et al.  Description of dynamic shared knowledge: an exploratory study during a competitive team sports interaction , 2011, Ergonomics.

[12]  E. Salas,et al.  Team cognition : understanding the factors that drive process and performance , 2004 .

[14]  C. Sève,et al.  Analysis of contextual information sharing during table tennis matches: An empirical study of coordination in sports , 2009 .

[15]  C. Heath,et al.  Analysing Interaction: video, ethnography and situated conduct , 2002 .

[16]  Daniel K. Johnson.  Letting the social and cognitive merge: New concepts for an understanding of group functioning in sport , 2008 .

[17]  C. Sève,et al.  Temporal Aspects of Team Cognition: A Case Study on Concerns Sharing Within Basketball , 2012 .

[18]  C. Goodwin.  Gestures as a resource for the organization of mutual orientation , 1986 .

[19]  G. Jefferson.  Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction , 2004 .

[20]  Germain Poizat,et al.  A Grounded Theory of Elite Male Table Tennis Players’ Activity during Matches , 2006 .

[21]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter , 1968 .

[22]  Christian Heath,et al.  Collaboration and controlCrisis management and multimedia technology in London Underground Line Control Rooms , 1992, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[23]  H. D. Jaegher,et al.  Enactive intersubjectivity: Participatory sense-making and mutual incorporation , 2009 .

[24]  M. Patton,et al.  Qualitative evaluation methods , 1981 .

[25]  P. Trudel,et al.  L’utilisation de la technique du rappel stimulé pour mieux comprendre le processus d’intervention de l’entraîneur en sport , 1996 .

[26]  E. Rosch,et al.  The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience , 1993 .

[27]  E. D. Paolo,et al.  Can social interaction constitute social cognition? , 2010, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[28]  David W. Eccles.  The coordination of labour in sports teams , 2010 .

[29]  Torsten Reimer,et al.  Shared and coordinated cognition in competitive and dynamic task environments: An information‐processing perspective for team sports , 2006 .

[30]  J. Cannon-Bowers,et al.  Applying work team results to sports teams: Opportunities and cautions , 2006 .

[31]  C. Heath,et al.  Gesture and institutional interaction: Figuring bids in auctions of fine art and antiques , 2007 .

[32]  C. Sève,et al.  Performance analysis in sport: Contributions from a joint analysis of athletes’ experience and biomechanical indicators , 2013, Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports.

[33]  Maurice Merleau-Ponty.  Phenomenology of Perception , 1964 .

[34]  Christian Heath,et al.  Embodied reference: A study of deixis in workplace interaction , 2000 .

[35]  David W. Eccles,et al.  A commentary on “team cognition and expert teams: Emerging insights into performance for exceptional teams” , 2006 .

[36]  Germain Poizat,et al.  Performance-induced emotions experienced during high-stakes table tennis matches. , 2007 .

[37]  Lorenza Mondada,et al.  Multimodal resources for turn-taking , 2007 .

[38]  E. Salas,et al.  Shared Expectations and Implicit Coordination in Tennis Doubles Teams , 2010 .

[39]  J. Sartre,et al.  Being and Nothingness: An Essay on Phenomenological Ontology , 1958 .

[40]  C. Sève,et al.  Team Coordination in Basketball: Description of the Cognitive Connections Among Teammates , 2010 .

[41]  Jacques Theureau,et al.  Course-of-Action Analysis and Course-of-Action-Centered Design , 2003 .

[42]  C. Heath,et al.  Body movement and speech in medical interaction: Postscript: the use of medical records and computers during the consultation , 1986 .

[43]  Lorenza Mondada,et al.  Using Video for a Sequential and Multimodal Analysis of Social Interaction: Videotaping Institutional Telephone Calls , 2008 .

[44]  David Eccles,et al.  Intrateam Communication and Performance in Doubles Tennis , 2009, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[45]  E. Hutchins,et al.  Constructing Meaning from Space, Gesture, and Speech , 1997 .

[46]  M. Overgaard,et al.  An Integration of First-Person Methodologies in Cognitive Science , 2008 .

[47]  Verlin B. Hinsz,et al.  The emerging conceptualization of groups as information processors. , 1997, Psychological bulletin.

[48]  R. Eklund,et al.  Handbook of sport psychology, 3rd ed. , 2007 .

[49]  Amanda LeCouteur,et al.  Real-time communication during play: Analysis of team-mates’ talk and interaction , 2011 .

[50]  C. Goodwin,et al.  Practices of Seeing: Visual Analysis: An Ethnomethodological Approach , 2000 .

[51]  David W. Eccles,et al.  Why an Expert Team is More Than a Team of Experts: A Social-Cognitive Conceptualization of Team Coordination and Communication in Sport. , 2004 .

[52]  R. Thelwell,et al.  The impact of opponents’ non-verbal behaviour on the first impressions and outcome expectations of table-tennis players , 2005 .