Peahens do not prefer peacocks with more elaborate trains
暂无分享,去创建一个
Toshikazu Hasegawa | Hiroyuki Arita | Mariko Hiraiwa-Hasegawa | T. Hasegawa | M. Hiraiwa-Hasegawa | Mariko Takahashi | H. Arita | Mariko Takahashi
[1] K. E. Omland. Female mallard mating preferences for multiple male ornaments , 1996, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.
[2] Adeline Loyau,et al. Intra‐ and Intersexual Selection for Multiple Traits in the Peacock (Pavo cristatus) , 2005 .
[3] M. Petrie,et al. Condition dependence, multiple sexual signals, and immunocompetence in peacocks , 2002 .
[4] W. George,et al. Darwinism , 1871, The Indian medical gazette.
[5] D. Harper. Maynard Smith: amplifying the reasons for signal reliability. , 2006, Journal of theoretical biology.
[6] M. Petrie,et al. Peacocks with low mating success are more likely to suffer predation , 1992, Animal Behaviour.
[7] M. Elgar,et al. Heritabilities and paradigm shifts , 1997, Nature.
[8] J. Uy,et al. Plumage brightness predicts male mating success in the lekking golden-collared manakin, Manacus vitellinus , 2006 .
[9] J. Kålås,et al. Correlates of male mating success in the lekking great snipe (Gallinago media): results from a four-year study , 1994 .
[10] P. Eason,et al. Colour bands, combs and coverable badges in willow ptarmigan , 1995, Animal Behaviour.
[11] J. Wiens. Widespread loss of sexually selected traits: how the peacock lost its spots , 2001 .
[12] M. Leonard,et al. Female mate choice and male behaviour in domestic fowl , 1998, Animal Behaviour.
[13] Lisa Shorey. Mating success on white-bearded manakin (Manacus manacus) leks: male characteristics and relatedness , 2002, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.
[14] M. Petrie,et al. Peahens prefer peacocks with elaborate trains , 1991, Animal Behaviour.
[15] G. Hill,et al. AVIAN SEXUAL DICHROMATISM IN RELATION TO PHYLOGENY AND ECOLOGY , 2003 .
[16] S. Yasmin,et al. Correlates of mating success in Indian Peafowl , 1996 .
[17] M. Petrie,et al. VARIATION IN MATE CHOICE AND MATING PREFERENCES: A REVIEW OF CAUSES AND CONSEQUENCES , 1997, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.
[18] S. Pruett-Jones,et al. SEXUAL SELECTION THROUGH FEMALE CHOICE IN LAWES' PAROTIA, A LEK‐MATING BIRD OF PARADISE , 1990, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[19] R. Short,et al. Hormonal basis of sexual dimorphism in birds: implications for new theories of sexual selection. , 1995, Trends in ecology & evolution.
[20] J. Manning,et al. Symmetry and ornamentation are correlated in the peacock's train , 1991, Animal Behaviour.
[21] T. Parker,et al. Female mating preferences in red junglefowl: a meta-analysis , 2003 .
[22] R. Kimball,et al. Evolution of Avian Plumage Dichromatism from a Proximate Perspective , 1999, The American Naturalist.
[23] R. Kimball,et al. Mate choice by female red junglefowl: the issues of multiple ornaments and fluctuating asymmetry , 1998, Animal Behaviour.
[24] Variation in the train morphology of peacocks (Pavo cristatus) , 1996 .
[25] C. Mateos,et al. Sexual selection in the ring-necked pheasant: a review , 1998 .
[26] M. Hiraiwa-Hasegawa. The sight of the peacock’s tail makes me sick: The early arguments on sexual selection , 2000, Journal of Biosciences.
[27] L. M. Brodsky. Ornament size influences mating success in male rock ptarmigan , 1988, Animal Behaviour.
[28] W. Rice,et al. PERSPECTIVE: CHASE‐AWAY SEXUAL SELECTION: ANTAGONISTIC SEDUCTION VERSUS RESISTANCE , 1998, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[29] J. Ligon,et al. Female quail prefer testosterone-mediated traits, rather than the ornate plumage of males , 2001, Animal Behaviour.
[30] F. Götmark,et al. Natural selection and sexual dimorphism : sex-biased sparrowhawk predation favours crypsis in female chaffinches , 1997 .
[31] A. Qvarnström,et al. PUTTING SEXUAL TRAITS INTO THE CONTEXT OF AN ORGANISM: A LIFE-HISTORY PERSPECTIVE IN STUDIES OF SEXUAL SELECTION , 2002 .
[32] J. Kålås,et al. Females of the lekking great snipe do not prefer males with whiter tails , 2000, Animal Behaviour.
[33] M. Petrie,et al. Offspring sex ratio is related to paternal train elaboration and yolk corticosterone in peafowl , 2005, Biology Letters.
[34] J. Höglund,et al. Behaviourally mediated sexual selection: characteristics of successful male black grouse , 1997, Animal Behaviour.
[35] J. Ligon,et al. Ornate plumage of male red junglefowl does not influence mate choice by females , 1995, Animal Behaviour.
[36] A. Watson,et al. Mate choice by hen Red Grouse Lagopus lagopus with an excess of cocks—role of territory size and food quality , 2008 .
[37] A. Møller,et al. Why have birds got multiple sexual ornaments? , 1993, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.
[38] R. Meldola. Sexual Selection , 1871, Nature.
[39] Widemo,et al. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder: causes and consequences of variation in mating preferences. , 1999, Trends in ecology & evolution.
[40] G. Davison. Behaviour of Malay peacock pheasant Polyplectron malacense (Aves: Phasianidae) , 2009 .
[41] M. W. Gratson. SEXUAL SELECTION FOR INCREASED MALE COURTSHIP AND ACOUSTIC SIGNALS AND AGAINST LARGE MALE SIZE AT SHARP‐TAILED GROUSE LEKS , 1993, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[42] A. Møller,et al. Testing and adjusting for publication bias , 2001 .
[43] J. Höglund,et al. Correlates of male mating success on black grouse (Tetrao tetrix L.) leks , 2001 .
[44] U. Candolin. The use of multiple cues in mate choice , 2003, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.
[45] R. Bleiweiss. Covariation of sexual dichromatism and plumage colours in lekking and non-lekking birds: A comparative analysis , 1997, Evolutionary Ecology.
[46] Anders Pape Møller,et al. The strength of sexual selection: a meta-analysis of bird studies , 1999 .
[47] M. Petrie,et al. Peahens lay more eggs for peacocks with larger trains , 1993, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.
[48] E. Braun,et al. A molecular phylogeny of the peacock-pheasants (Galliformes: Polyplectron spp.) indicates loss and reduction of ornamental traits and display behaviours , 2001 .
[49] A. Møller,et al. A survey of the statistical power of research in behavioral ecology and animal behavior , 2003 .
[50] J. Bradbury,et al. Sexual selection in lekking sage grouse: phenotypic correlates of male mating success , 1985, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.
[51] Rauno V. Alatalo,et al. Good-genes effects in sexual selection , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.
[52] A. Møller,et al. Components of phenotypic variation in avian ornamental and non-ornamental feathers , 2004, Evolutionary Ecology.
[53] L. Fusani,et al. Sexually selected vigilance behaviour of the grey partridge is affected by plasma androgen levels , 1997, Animal Behaviour.
[54] J. L. Tomkins,et al. Fluctuating paradigm , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.
[55] M. Petrie,et al. Experimental and natural changes in the peacock's (Pavo cristatus) train can affect mating success , 1994, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.
[56] A. Lelliott,et al. The social organization of feral peafowl , 1984, Animal Behaviour.
[57] David B. McDonald,et al. Correlates of male mating success in a lekking bird with male-male cooperation , 1989, Animal Behaviour.
[58] Repeatability of mate choice in female red jungle fowl , 1996 .
[59] G. Davison. Sexual selection and the mating system of Argusianus argus (Aves: Phasianidae) , 1981 .
[60] M. Petrie. Do peacock's trains advertise age? , 1993 .
[61] T. Hasegawa,et al. Seasonal and diurnal use of eight different call types by Indian peafowl (Pavo cristatus) , 2008, Journal of Ethology.
[62] J. Bradbury,et al. Mate choice in lekking sage grouse revisited: the roles of vocal display , 1991 .
[63] P. Fiske,et al. Mating success in lekking males: a meta-analysis , 1998 .
[64] J. Manning. Age‐advertisement and the evolution of the peacock's train , 1989 .
[65] A. Louchart. A true peafowl in Africa , 2003 .
[66] K. E. Omland. Female mallard mating preferences for multiple male ornaments , 1996, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.
[67] N. Hart. Vision in the peafowl (Aves: Pavo cristatus). , 2002, The Journal of experimental biology.
[68] James N. M. Smith,et al. Lek size variation and its consequences in the ochre-bellied flycatcher, Mionectes oleagineus , 1997 .
[69] G. Sorci,et al. Multiple sexual advertisements honestly reflect health status in peacocks (Pavo cristatus) , 2005, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.
[70] J. Höglund,et al. Direct and Indirect Mate Choice on Leks , 2005, The American Naturalist.
[71] P. Pye-Smith. The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex , 1871, Nature.
[72] J. Guyomarc'h,et al. Individual differences in the long-distance vocalizations used during pair bonding in European quail (Coturnix coturnix) , 1998 .
[73] N. Hart. Variations in cone photoreceptor abundance and the visual ecology of birds , 2001, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.
[74] S. Andersson. Sexual selection and cues for female choice in leks of Jackson's widowbird Euplectes jacksoni , 1989, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.
[75] M. Petrie,et al. Improved growth and survival of offspring of peacocks with more elaborate trains , 1994, Nature.
[76] F. Dessì-Fulgheri,et al. Mate choice in the grey partridge, Perdix perdix : role of physical and behavioural male traits , 1995, Animal Behaviour.
[77] R. Buchholz. Female choice, parasite load and male ornamentation in wild turkeys , 1995, Animal Behaviour.
[78] R. Gadagkar. Is the peacock merely beautiful or also honest , 2003 .
[79] G. Sorci,et al. Non-defendable resources affect peafowl lek organization: A male removal experiment , 2007, Behavioural Processes.
[80] M. Petrie,et al. Multiple mating in a lekking bird: why do peahens mate with more than one male and with the same male more than once? , 1992, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.