Peahens do not prefer peacocks with more elaborate trains

The elaborate train of male Indian peafowl, Pavo cristatus, is thought to have evolved in response to female mate choice and may be an indicator of good genes. The aim of this study was to investigate the role of the male train in mate choice using male- and female-centred observations in a feral population of Indian peafowl in Japan over 7 years. We found no evidence that peahens expressed any preference for peacocks with more elaborate trains (i.e. trains having more ocelli, a more symmetrical arrangement or a greater length), similar to other studies of galliforms showing that females disregard male plumage. Combined with previous results, our findings indicate that the peacock's train (1) is not the universal target of female choice, (2) shows small variance among males across populations and (3) based on current physiological knowledge, does not appear to reliably reflect the male condition. We also found that some behavioural characteristics of peacocks during displays were largely affected by female behaviours and were spuriously correlated with male mating success. Although the male train and its direct display towards females seem necessary for successful reproduction, we conclude that peahens in this population are likely to exercise active choice based on cues other than the peacock's train.

[1]  K. E. Omland Female mallard mating preferences for multiple male ornaments , 1996, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[2]  Adeline Loyau,et al.  Intra‐ and Intersexual Selection for Multiple Traits in the Peacock (Pavo cristatus) , 2005 .

[3]  M. Petrie,et al.  Condition dependence, multiple sexual signals, and immunocompetence in peacocks , 2002 .

[4]  W. George,et al.  Darwinism , 1871, The Indian medical gazette.

[5]  D. Harper Maynard Smith: amplifying the reasons for signal reliability. , 2006, Journal of theoretical biology.

[6]  M. Petrie,et al.  Peacocks with low mating success are more likely to suffer predation , 1992, Animal Behaviour.

[7]  M. Elgar,et al.  Heritabilities and paradigm shifts , 1997, Nature.

[8]  J. Uy,et al.  Plumage brightness predicts male mating success in the lekking golden-collared manakin, Manacus vitellinus , 2006 .

[9]  J. Kålås,et al.  Correlates of male mating success in the lekking great snipe (Gallinago media): results from a four-year study , 1994 .

[10]  P. Eason,et al.  Colour bands, combs and coverable badges in willow ptarmigan , 1995, Animal Behaviour.

[11]  J. Wiens Widespread loss of sexually selected traits: how the peacock lost its spots , 2001 .

[12]  M. Leonard,et al.  Female mate choice and male behaviour in domestic fowl , 1998, Animal Behaviour.

[13]  Lisa Shorey Mating success on white-bearded manakin (Manacus manacus) leks: male characteristics and relatedness , 2002, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[14]  M. Petrie,et al.  Peahens prefer peacocks with elaborate trains , 1991, Animal Behaviour.

[15]  G. Hill,et al.  AVIAN SEXUAL DICHROMATISM IN RELATION TO PHYLOGENY AND ECOLOGY , 2003 .

[16]  S. Yasmin,et al.  Correlates of mating success in Indian Peafowl , 1996 .

[17]  M. Petrie,et al.  VARIATION IN MATE CHOICE AND MATING PREFERENCES: A REVIEW OF CAUSES AND CONSEQUENCES , 1997, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[18]  S. Pruett-Jones,et al.  SEXUAL SELECTION THROUGH FEMALE CHOICE IN LAWES' PAROTIA, A LEK‐MATING BIRD OF PARADISE , 1990, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[19]  R. Short,et al.  Hormonal basis of sexual dimorphism in birds: implications for new theories of sexual selection. , 1995, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[20]  J. Manning,et al.  Symmetry and ornamentation are correlated in the peacock's train , 1991, Animal Behaviour.

[21]  T. Parker,et al.  Female mating preferences in red junglefowl: a meta-analysis , 2003 .

[22]  R. Kimball,et al.  Evolution of Avian Plumage Dichromatism from a Proximate Perspective , 1999, The American Naturalist.

[23]  R. Kimball,et al.  Mate choice by female red junglefowl: the issues of multiple ornaments and fluctuating asymmetry , 1998, Animal Behaviour.

[24]  Variation in the train morphology of peacocks (Pavo cristatus) , 1996 .

[25]  C. Mateos,et al.  Sexual selection in the ring-necked pheasant: a review , 1998 .

[26]  M. Hiraiwa-Hasegawa The sight of the peacock’s tail makes me sick: The early arguments on sexual selection , 2000, Journal of Biosciences.

[27]  L. M. Brodsky Ornament size influences mating success in male rock ptarmigan , 1988, Animal Behaviour.

[28]  W. Rice,et al.  PERSPECTIVE: CHASE‐AWAY SEXUAL SELECTION: ANTAGONISTIC SEDUCTION VERSUS RESISTANCE , 1998, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[29]  J. Ligon,et al.  Female quail prefer testosterone-mediated traits, rather than the ornate plumage of males , 2001, Animal Behaviour.

[30]  F. Götmark,et al.  Natural selection and sexual dimorphism : sex-biased sparrowhawk predation favours crypsis in female chaffinches , 1997 .

[31]  A. Qvarnström,et al.  PUTTING SEXUAL TRAITS INTO THE CONTEXT OF AN ORGANISM: A LIFE-HISTORY PERSPECTIVE IN STUDIES OF SEXUAL SELECTION , 2002 .

[32]  J. Kålås,et al.  Females of the lekking great snipe do not prefer males with whiter tails , 2000, Animal Behaviour.

[33]  M. Petrie,et al.  Offspring sex ratio is related to paternal train elaboration and yolk corticosterone in peafowl , 2005, Biology Letters.

[34]  J. Höglund,et al.  Behaviourally mediated sexual selection: characteristics of successful male black grouse , 1997, Animal Behaviour.

[35]  J. Ligon,et al.  Ornate plumage of male red junglefowl does not influence mate choice by females , 1995, Animal Behaviour.

[36]  A. Watson,et al.  Mate choice by hen Red Grouse Lagopus lagopus with an excess of cocks—role of territory size and food quality , 2008 .

[37]  A. Møller,et al.  Why have birds got multiple sexual ornaments? , 1993, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[38]  R. Meldola Sexual Selection , 1871, Nature.

[39]  Widemo,et al.  Beauty is in the eye of the beholder: causes and consequences of variation in mating preferences. , 1999, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[40]  G. Davison Behaviour of Malay peacock pheasant Polyplectron malacense (Aves: Phasianidae) , 2009 .

[41]  M. W. Gratson SEXUAL SELECTION FOR INCREASED MALE COURTSHIP AND ACOUSTIC SIGNALS AND AGAINST LARGE MALE SIZE AT SHARP‐TAILED GROUSE LEKS , 1993, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[42]  A. Møller,et al.  Testing and adjusting for publication bias , 2001 .

[43]  J. Höglund,et al.  Correlates of male mating success on black grouse (Tetrao tetrix L.) leks , 2001 .

[44]  U. Candolin The use of multiple cues in mate choice , 2003, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[45]  R. Bleiweiss Covariation of sexual dichromatism and plumage colours in lekking and non-lekking birds: A comparative analysis , 1997, Evolutionary Ecology.

[46]  Anders Pape Møller,et al.  The strength of sexual selection: a meta-analysis of bird studies , 1999 .

[47]  M. Petrie,et al.  Peahens lay more eggs for peacocks with larger trains , 1993, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[48]  E. Braun,et al.  A molecular phylogeny of the peacock-pheasants (Galliformes: Polyplectron spp.) indicates loss and reduction of ornamental traits and display behaviours , 2001 .

[49]  A. Møller,et al.  A survey of the statistical power of research in behavioral ecology and animal behavior , 2003 .

[50]  J. Bradbury,et al.  Sexual selection in lekking sage grouse: phenotypic correlates of male mating success , 1985, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[51]  Rauno V. Alatalo,et al.  Good-genes effects in sexual selection , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[52]  A. Møller,et al.  Components of phenotypic variation in avian ornamental and non-ornamental feathers , 2004, Evolutionary Ecology.

[53]  L. Fusani,et al.  Sexually selected vigilance behaviour of the grey partridge is affected by plasma androgen levels , 1997, Animal Behaviour.

[54]  J. L. Tomkins,et al.  Fluctuating paradigm , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[55]  M. Petrie,et al.  Experimental and natural changes in the peacock's (Pavo cristatus) train can affect mating success , 1994, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[56]  A. Lelliott,et al.  The social organization of feral peafowl , 1984, Animal Behaviour.

[57]  David B. McDonald,et al.  Correlates of male mating success in a lekking bird with male-male cooperation , 1989, Animal Behaviour.

[58]  Repeatability of mate choice in female red jungle fowl , 1996 .

[59]  G. Davison Sexual selection and the mating system of Argusianus argus (Aves: Phasianidae) , 1981 .

[60]  M. Petrie Do peacock's trains advertise age? , 1993 .

[61]  T. Hasegawa,et al.  Seasonal and diurnal use of eight different call types by Indian peafowl (Pavo cristatus) , 2008, Journal of Ethology.

[62]  J. Bradbury,et al.  Mate choice in lekking sage grouse revisited: the roles of vocal display , 1991 .

[63]  P. Fiske,et al.  Mating success in lekking males: a meta-analysis , 1998 .

[64]  J. Manning Age‐advertisement and the evolution of the peacock's train , 1989 .

[65]  A. Louchart A true peafowl in Africa , 2003 .

[66]  K. E. Omland Female mallard mating preferences for multiple male ornaments , 1996, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[67]  N. Hart Vision in the peafowl (Aves: Pavo cristatus). , 2002, The Journal of experimental biology.

[68]  James N. M. Smith,et al.  Lek size variation and its consequences in the ochre-bellied flycatcher, Mionectes oleagineus , 1997 .

[69]  G. Sorci,et al.  Multiple sexual advertisements honestly reflect health status in peacocks (Pavo cristatus) , 2005, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[70]  J. Höglund,et al.  Direct and Indirect Mate Choice on Leks , 2005, The American Naturalist.

[71]  P. Pye-Smith The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex , 1871, Nature.

[72]  J. Guyomarc'h,et al.  Individual differences in the long-distance vocalizations used during pair bonding in European quail (Coturnix coturnix) , 1998 .

[73]  N. Hart Variations in cone photoreceptor abundance and the visual ecology of birds , 2001, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[74]  S. Andersson Sexual selection and cues for female choice in leks of Jackson's widowbird Euplectes jacksoni , 1989, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[75]  M. Petrie,et al.  Improved growth and survival of offspring of peacocks with more elaborate trains , 1994, Nature.

[76]  F. Dessì-Fulgheri,et al.  Mate choice in the grey partridge, Perdix perdix : role of physical and behavioural male traits , 1995, Animal Behaviour.

[77]  R. Buchholz Female choice, parasite load and male ornamentation in wild turkeys , 1995, Animal Behaviour.

[78]  R. Gadagkar Is the peacock merely beautiful or also honest , 2003 .

[79]  G. Sorci,et al.  Non-defendable resources affect peafowl lek organization: A male removal experiment , 2007, Behavioural Processes.

[80]  M. Petrie,et al.  Multiple mating in a lekking bird: why do peahens mate with more than one male and with the same male more than once? , 1992, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.