Strategies to decrease water drainage and nitrate emission from soilless cultures of greenhouse tomato

In the spring-summer season of 2005 and 2006, we explored the influence of three fertigation strategies (A-C) on the water and nitrogen use efficiency of semi-closed rockwool culture of greenhouse tomato conducted using saline water (NaCl concentration of 9.5molm-3). The strategies under comparison were the following: (A) crop water uptake was compensated by refilling the mixing tank with nutrient solution at full strength (with the concentrations of macronutrients equal or close to the corresponding mean uptake concentrations as determined in previous studies) and the recirculating nutrient solution was flushed out whenever its electrical conductivity (EC) surpassed 4.5dSm-1 due to the accumulation of NaCl; (B) the refill nutrient solution had a variable EC in order to maintain a target value of 3.0dSm-1; due to the progressive accumulation of NaCl, the EC and macronutrient concentrations of the refill nutrient solution tended to decrease with time, thus resulting in a progressive nutrient depletion in the recycling water till N-NO3- content dropped below 1.0molm-3, when the nutrient solution was replaced; (C) likewise Strategy A, but when EC reached 4.5dSm-1, crop water uptake was compensated with fresh water only in order to reduce N-NO3- concentration below 1.0molm-3 before discharge. In 2005 an open (free-drain) system (Strategy D), where the plants were irrigated with full-strength nutrient solution without drainage water recycling, was also tested in order to verify the possible influence of NaCl accumulation and/or nutrient depletion in the root zone on crop performance. In the semi-closed systems conducted following strategies A, B or C, the nutrient solution was replaced, respectively, 10, 14 and 7 times in 2005, and in 19, 24 and 14 times in 2006, when the cultivation lasted 167 days instead of 84 days in 2005. In both years, there were no important differences in fruit yield and quality among the strategies under investigation. Strategy C produced the best results in terms of water use and drainage, while Strategy B was the most efficient procedure with regard to nitrogen use. In contrast to strategies A and D, the application of strategies B and C minimized nitrogen emissions and also resulted in N-NO3- concentrations in the effluents that were invariably lower than the limit (approximately 1.42molm-3) imposed to the N-NO3- concentration of wastewater discharged into surface water by the current legislation associated to the implementation of European Nitrate Directive in Italy.

[1]  Hans-Peter Kläring,et al.  Strategies to control water and nutrient supplies to greenhouse crops. A review , 2001 .

[2]  J. L. Bot,et al.  Growth and Nitrogen Status of Soilless Tomato Plants Following Nitrate Withdrawal from the Nutrient Solution , 2001 .

[3]  R. Walker,et al.  Responses of plant growth rate to nitrogen supply: a comparison of relative addition and N interruption treatments. , 2001, Journal of experimental botany.

[4]  R. Latin Blossom End Rot of Tomato Fruit , 1984 .

[5]  A. Gül,et al.  Economic analysis of soilless and soil-based greenhouse cucumber production in Turkey , 2009 .

[6]  Francisco Rodríguez,et al.  Simulation of transpiration, drainage, N uptake, nitrate leaching, and N uptake concentration in tomato grown in open substrate. , 2009 .

[7]  Alberto Pardossi,et al.  Modeling Salinity Build-Up in Recirculating Nutrient Solution Culture , 2005 .

[8]  D. Savvas,et al.  Plant Nutrition and Physiological Disorders in Greenhouse Grown Tomato, Pepper and Eggplant , 2008 .

[9]  Alberto Pardossi,et al.  The influence of drip irrigation or subirrigation on tomato grown in closed-loop substrate culture with saline water , 2006 .

[10]  F. Boari,et al.  SALINITY EFFECTS ON TOMATO , 2008 .

[11]  A. Pardossi,et al.  A comparison between two methods to control nutrient delivery to greenhouse melons grown in recirculating nutrient solution culture , 2002 .

[12]  L. Marcelis,et al.  Regulation of K uptake, water uptake, and growth of tomato during K starvation and recovery , 2004 .

[13]  Alberto Pardossi,et al.  An aggregated model for water requirements of greenhouse tomato grown in closed rockwool culture with saline water , 2007 .

[14]  Michael Raviv,et al.  ASSESSMENT OF VARIOUS CONTROL STRATEGIES FOR RECIRCULATION OF GREENHOUSE EFFLUENTS UNDER SEMI-ARID CONDITIONS , 1998 .

[15]  S. Chaillou,et al.  Plant response to nitrate starvation is determined by N storage capacity matched by nitrate uptake capacity in two Arabidopsis genotypes. , 2008, Journal of experimental botany.

[16]  C. Stanghellini,et al.  Closed water loop in greenhouses : effect of water quality and value of produce , 2005 .

[17]  D. Daum,et al.  Influence of nutrient solution pH on N2O and N2 emissions from a soilless culture system , 1998, Plant and Soil.

[18]  A. Antón,et al.  High decrease in nitrate leaching by lower N input without reducing greenhouse tomato yield , 2008, Agronomy for Sustainable Development.

[19]  Alberto Pardossi,et al.  Simplified Models for the Water Relations of Soilless Cultures: what they do or Suggest for Sustainable Water Use in Intensive Horticulture , 2006 .

[20]  D. T. Britto,et al.  Growth of a tomato crop at reduced nutrient concentrations as a strategy to limit eutrophication , 1998 .