Green process innovation and differentiated pricing strategies with environmental concerns of South-North markets

This paper investigates the green process innovation and differentiated dynamic pricing strategies for a Southern firm under a two-market framework where a North country imposes a carbon tariff and a South country announces an emission cap. Results from the dynamic optimization problem show that carbon tariff decreases innovation, domestic price, the firm’s profit and the Southern social welfare but increases foreign price. A less strict binding emission cap enhances innovation, the firm’s revenue and the Northern social welfare but cuts domestic price. The domestic price can be higher, lower or intersect with its counterpart in the North under different situations.

[1]  Ngo Van Long,et al.  A Survey Of Dynamic Games In Economics , 2010 .

[2]  Georges Zaccour,et al.  Slowing deforestation pace through subsidies: a differential game , 2003, Autom..

[3]  Andrea Mantovani,et al.  Process and product innovation by a multiproduct monopolist: A dynamic approach , 2009 .

[4]  María C. Cuerva,et al.  Drivers of green and non-green innovation: empirical evidence in Low-Tech SMEs , 2014 .

[5]  Marc J. Melitz The Impact of Trade on Intra-Industry Reallocations and Aggregate Industry Productivity , 2003 .

[6]  Ki-Hoon Lee,et al.  The impacts of carbon (CO2) emissions and environmental research and development (R&D) investment on firm performance , 2015 .

[7]  Fouad El Ouardighi,et al.  Pollution accumulation and abatement policy in a supply chain , 2016, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[8]  M. Cortimiglia,et al.  Success factors for environmentally sustainable product innovation: a systematic literature review , 2014 .

[9]  Carmine Ornaghi,et al.  Spillovers in product and process innovation: Evidence from manufacturing firms , 2006 .

[10]  M. S. Taylor,et al.  Unmasking the Pollution Haven Effect , 2004 .

[11]  Tsan-Ming Choi,et al.  Effects of carbon tariffs trading policy on duopoly market entry decisions and price competition: Insights from textile firms of developing countries , 2016 .

[12]  C. Herstatt,et al.  Green Innovation in Technology and Innovation Management – An Exploratory Literature Review , 2012 .

[13]  Georges Zaccour,et al.  Carbon tariffs and cooperative outcomes , 2012 .

[14]  Georges Zaccour,et al.  A differential game of international pollution control with evolving environmental costs , 2012, Environment and Development Economics.

[15]  Stephan Vachon,et al.  A resource-based view of green supply management , 2011 .

[16]  G. Thompson,et al.  Optimal Control Theory: Applications to Management Science and Economics , 2000 .

[17]  Xin Wang,et al.  Is it in China's interest to implement an export carbon tax? , 2012 .

[18]  Mohd Rizaimy Shaharudin,et al.  Green innovation adoption in automotive supply chain: the Malaysian case , 2015 .

[19]  Jeff McGill,et al.  Optimal Dynamic Pricing of Perishable Items by a Monopolist Facing Strategic Consumers , 2010 .

[20]  Georges Zaccour,et al.  Dynamic Games in the Economics and Management of Pollution , 2009 .

[21]  Xiao-xing Huang,et al.  The relationships between regulatory and customer pressure, green organizational responses, and green innovation performance , 2016 .

[22]  Régis Chenavaz,et al.  Dynamic pricing, product and process innovation , 2012, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[23]  Masanobu Ishikawa,et al.  Economic and environmental impact analysis of carbon tariffs on Chinese exports , 2015 .

[24]  Zugang Liu,et al.  Consumer environmental awareness and competition in two-stage supply chains , 2012, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[25]  Tao Wang,et al.  Addressing the competitiveness effects of taxing carbon in China: domestic tax cuts versus border tax adjustments , 2016 .

[26]  Pinar Keskinocak,et al.  Dynamic pricing in the presence of inventory considerations: research overview, current practices, and future directions , 2003, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[27]  Alper Sen,et al.  A Comparison of Fixed and Dynamic Pricing Policies in Revenue Management , 2013 .

[28]  George Zillante,et al.  Challenges for China׳s energy conservation and emission reduction , 2014 .

[29]  A. Pakes,et al.  The Rate of Obsolescence of Knowledge, Research Gestation Lags, and the Private Rate of Return to Research Resources , 1979 .

[30]  Jun Fu,et al.  Hybrid intelligent optimal control of fused magnesium furnaces , 2010, 49th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC).

[31]  Xi Chen,et al.  The carbon-constrained EOQ , 2013, Oper. Res. Lett..

[32]  Jiuh-Biing Sheu,et al.  Environmental-Regulation Pricing Strategies for Green Supply Chain Management , 2009 .

[33]  Albert P. M. Wagelmans,et al.  The economic lot-sizing problem with an emission capacity constraint , 2015, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[34]  Safia Kedad-Sidhoum,et al.  Lot sizing with carbon emission constraints , 2010, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[35]  Jianxin You,et al.  Production , Manufacturing and Logistics Consumer environmental awareness and channel coordination with two substitutable products , 2014 .

[36]  H. Chan,et al.  The influence of greening the suppliers and green innovation on environmental performance and competitive advantage in Taiwan , 2011 .

[37]  Yu‐Shan Chen The Driver of Green Innovation and Green Image – Green Core Competence , 2008 .