Investigación con el sistema da Vinci® en el Hospital St Marys de Londres

ypothesis: The da Vinci™ Surgical System allows surgeons to overcome the limitations imposed by minimally invasive surgery (MIS) in terms of dexterity, operative field control and ergonomy. The studies included evaluate the learning curve, 3-D vision and motion analysis to reveal the system’s advantages over MIS and to establish performance assessment methods. Methods: system employed: da Vinci™ Surgical System. Three comparative experiments with 11 to 13 surgeons performing different tasks looking at: learning curve comparing experienced and non-experienced surgeons, advantages of 3D over 2D vision, and advantages of robotic surgery over Minimally Invasive Surgery (MIS). Assessment: measurement of surgeon’s performance by means of a global scale for skills (OSATS) and errors count, with blind scoring by experts. Additionally, motion analysis software for MIS (ICSAD) and robotic surgery (ROVIMAS), both developed by the Department and previously validated in other studies. Statistic calculations: SPSS 10,0™ software. P<0,05. Results: The learning curve rendered an OSATS score of 18 for the first attempt and 26 for the fifth (p=0,02, Cronbah alpha: 0.894). Motion analysis showed reduction in number of movements and path length (p=0,01). Comparing robotic surgery with 3-D vision vs. MIS rendered a 40% reduction in time taken (p=0,001) and 70% reduction in path length (0,008), with 93% less skill-related errors. 3-D vision was proved to be superior to 2-D in several trials. Conclusion: “Endowrist” instruments, tremor abolition, motion scaling and 3-D vision of the da Vinci™ Surgical System enhance the surgeon’s dexterity and performance in robotic assisted MIS.

[1]  F. Mohr,et al.  Computer-enhanced mitral valve surgery: toward a total endoscopic procedure. , 1999, Seminars in thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[2]  A. Darzi,et al.  The use of electromagnetic motion tracking analysis to objectively measure open surgical skill in the laboratory-based model. , 2001, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[3]  Fernando Bello,et al.  An active constraint environment for minimally invasive heart surgery: early experience of a cutting operation. , 2004, Studies in health technology and informatics.

[4]  G. Perdikis,et al.  The surgical option for gastroesophageal reflux disease. , 1997, The American journal of medicine.

[5]  R. Reznick,et al.  Validation of an objective structured assessment of technical skill for surgical residents , 1996, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[6]  M Patkin,et al.  Ergonomics, engineering and surgery of endosurgical dissection. , 1995, Journal of the Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh.

[7]  B L Davies,et al.  Active compliance in robotic surgery—the use of force control as a dynamic constraint , 1997, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[8]  M. Mueller,et al.  Three-dimensional laparoscopy , 1999, Surgical Endoscopy.

[9]  R. Reznick,et al.  Objective structured assessment of technical skill (OSATS) for surgical residents , 1997, The British journal of surgery.

[10]  A. Darzi,et al.  Qualitative and quantitative analysis of the learning curve of a simulated surgical task on the da Vinci system , 2004, Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques.

[11]  D I Watson,et al.  A learning curve for laparoscopic fundoplication. Definable, avoidable, or a waste of time? , 1996, Annals of surgery.

[12]  Fernando Bello,et al.  ROVIMAS: a software package for assessing surgical skills using the da Vinci telemanipulator system , 2003, 4th International IEEE EMBS Special Topic Conference on Information Technology Applications in Biomedicine, 2003..

[13]  W. Chapman,et al.  Comparison of laparoscopic cholecystectomy with open cholecystectomy in a single center. , 1993, American journal of surgery.

[14]  R. Reznick,et al.  A comprehensive examination for senior surgical residents. , 2000, American journal of surgery.

[15]  M O Schurr,et al.  The role and future of endoscopic imaging systems. , 1999, Endoscopy.

[16]  C D Smith,et al.  Assessing laparoscopic manipulative skills. , 2001, American journal of surgery.

[17]  Ara Darzi,et al.  Robotic assisted rectopexy. , 2004, American journal of surgery.

[18]  James A. Young,et al.  Robotic Surgical Training in an Academic Institution , 2001, Annals of surgery.

[19]  A. Darzi,et al.  Dexterity enhancement with robotic surgery , 2004, Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques.

[20]  B. Davies Robotic devices in surgery , 2003, Minimally invasive therapy & allied technologies : MITAT : official journal of the Society for Minimally Invasive Therapy.