A direct product theorem for quantum communication complexity with applications to device-independent QKD

We give a direct product theorem for the entanglement-assisted interactive quantum communication complexity of an l-player predicate V. In particular we show that for a distribution p that is product across the input sets of the l players, the success probability of any entanglement-assisted quantum communication protocol for computing n copies of V, whose communication is o(log(eff∗(V, p)) · n), goes down exponentially in n. Here eff∗(V, p) is a distributional version of the quantum efficiency or partition bound introduced by Laplante, Lerays and Roland (2012), which is a lower bound on the distributional quantum communication complexity of computing a single copy of V with respect to p. For a two-input boolean function f , the best result for interactive quantum communication complexity known previously was due to Sherstov (2018), who showed a direct product theorem in terms of the generalized discrepancy, which is a lower bound on communication. Our lower bound on non-distributional communication complexity is in terms of maxproduct p eff ∗(V, p), and there is no known relationship between this and the generalized discrepancy. But we define a distributional version of the generalized discrepancy bound and can show that for a given p, eff∗(V, p) upper bounds it. Moreover, unlike Sherstov’s result, our result works for two-input functions or relations whose outputs are non-boolean as well, and is a strong direct product theorem for functions or relations whose quantum communication complexity is characterized by eff∗(V f , p) for a product p. As an application of our result, we show that it is possible to do device-independent quantum key distribution (DIQKD) without the assumption that devices do not leak any information after inputs are provided to them. We analyze the DIQKD protocol given by Jain, Miller and Shi (2020), and show that when the protocol is carried out with devices that are compatible with n copies of the Magic Square game, it is possible to extract Ω(n) bits of key from it, even in the presence of O(n) bits of leakage. Our security proof is parallel, i.e., the honest parties can enter all their inputs into their devices at once, and works for a leakage model that is arbitrarily interactive, i.e., the devices of the honest parties Alice and Bob can exchange information with each other and with the eavesdropper Eve in any number of rounds, as long as the total number of bits or qubits communicated is bounded. *To appear in FOCS 2021. https://arxiv.org/abs/2106.04299 †Centre for Quantum Technologies and Department of Computer Science, National University of Singapore and MajuLab, UMI 3654, Singapore. Email: rahul@comp.nus.edu.sg ‡Centre for Quantum Technologies, National University of Singapore, Singapore. Email: srijita.kundu@u.nus.edu

[1]  Rahul Jain,et al.  Short Proofs of the Quantum Substate Theorem , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[2]  Alexander A. Razborov,et al.  On the Distributional Complexity of Disjointness , 1992, Theor. Comput. Sci..

[3]  Thomas Vidick,et al.  Simple and tight device-independent security proofs , 2016, SIAM J. Comput..

[4]  Rahul Jain,et al.  Parallel Device-Independent Quantum Key Distribution , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[5]  Rahul Jain,et al.  A strong direct product theorem in terms of the smooth rectangle bound , 2012, ArXiv.

[6]  A. Razborov Communication Complexity , 2011 .

[7]  V. Scarani,et al.  Device-independent quantum key distribution secure against collective attacks , 2009, 0903.4460.

[8]  Mark Braverman,et al.  Direct Product via Round-Preserving Compression , 2013, ICALP.

[9]  Thomas Vidick,et al.  Hardness amplification for entangled games via anchoring , 2017, STOC.

[10]  Srijita Kundu,et al.  Composably secure device-independent encryption with certified deletion. , 2020 .

[11]  Alexander A. Sherstov Compressing Interactive Communication under Product Distributions , 2016, FOCS.

[12]  David Steurer,et al.  A parallel repetition theorem for entangled projection games , 2013, computational complexity.

[13]  Rahul Jain,et al.  A direct product theorem for one-way quantum communication , 2020, Electron. Colloquium Comput. Complex..

[14]  Jaikumar Radhakrishnan,et al.  The Quantum Communication Complexity of the Pointer Chasing Problem: The Bit Version , 2002, FSTTCS.

[15]  Ronald de Wolf,et al.  On Quantum Versions of the Yao Principle , 2001, STACS.

[16]  Troy Lee,et al.  A Direct Product Theorem for Discrepancy , 2008, 2008 23rd Annual IEEE Conference on Computational Complexity.

[17]  Emanuele Viola,et al.  Norms, XOR Lemmas, and Lower Bounds for Polynomials and Protocols , 2008, Theory Comput..

[18]  Omar Fawzi,et al.  Entropy Accumulation , 2016, Communications in Mathematical Physics.

[19]  Mark Braverman,et al.  Information Equals Amortized Communication , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[20]  Gilles Brassard,et al.  Quantum cryptography: Public key distribution and coin tossing , 2014, Theor. Comput. Sci..

[21]  Alexander A. Sherstov Compressing Interactive Communication under Product Distributions , 2016, 2016 IEEE 57th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS).

[22]  Umesh V. Vazirani,et al.  Fully device independent quantum key distribution , 2012, Commun. ACM.

[23]  Robert König,et al.  The Operational Meaning of Min- and Max-Entropy , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[24]  Rahul Jain,et al.  A Direct Product Theorem for Two-Party Bounded-Round Public-Coin Communication Complexity , 2016, 2012 IEEE 53rd Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science.

[25]  Andrew Chi-Chih Yao,et al.  Informational complexity and the direct sum problem for simultaneous message complexity , 2001, Proceedings 2001 IEEE International Conference on Cluster Computing.

[26]  Ronald de Wolf,et al.  A Hypercontractive Inequality for Matrix-Valued Functions with Applications to Quantum Computing and LDCs , 2007, 2008 49th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science.

[27]  Thomas Vidick,et al.  Practical device-independent quantum cryptography via entropy accumulation , 2018, Nature Communications.

[28]  Thomas Holenstein,et al.  Parallel repetition: simplifications and the no-signaling case , 2007, STOC '07.

[29]  M. Sion On general minimax theorems , 1958 .

[30]  Ziv Bar-Yossef,et al.  An information statistics approach to data stream and communication complexity , 2002, The 43rd Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, 2002. Proceedings..

[31]  Andrew Chi-Chih Yao,et al.  Probabilistic computations: Toward a unified measure of complexity , 1977, 18th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (sfcs 1977).

[32]  Xi Chen,et al.  How to compress interactive communication , 2010, STOC '10.

[33]  Rahul Jain,et al.  Quantum Measurement Adversary , 2021, ArXiv.

[34]  J Silman,et al.  Device-independent randomness generation in the presence of weak cross-talk. , 2012, Physical review letters.

[35]  Thomas Vidick,et al.  Parallel DIQKD from parallel repetition , 2017, 1703.08508.

[36]  B. Tsirelson Quantum analogues of the Bell inequalities. The case of two spatially separated domains , 1987 .

[37]  Henry Yuen,et al.  A parallel repetition theorem for all entangled games , 2016, Electron. Colloquium Comput. Complex..

[38]  Ran Raz,et al.  A parallel repetition theorem , 1995, STOC '95.

[39]  Julia Kempe,et al.  Unique Games with Entangled Provers are Easy , 2008, 2008 49th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science.

[40]  Rahul Jain,et al.  A Parallel Repetition Theorem for Entangled Two-Player One-Round Games under Product Distributions , 2013, 2014 IEEE 29th Conference on Computational Complexity (CCC).

[41]  Hartmut Klauck A strong direct product theorem for disjointness , 2010, STOC '10.

[42]  N. Gisin,et al.  Informationally restricted quantum correlations , 2019, Quantum.

[43]  Hartmut Klauck,et al.  Quantum and classical strong direct product theorems and optimal time-space tradeoffs , 2004, 45th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science.

[44]  Mark Braverman,et al.  Direct Products in Communication Complexity , 2013, 2013 IEEE 54th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science.

[45]  Sophie Laplante,et al.  Classical and Quantum Partition Bound and Detector Inefficiency , 2012, ICALP.

[46]  Renato Renner,et al.  Security of quantum key distribution , 2005, Ausgezeichnete Informatikdissertationen.

[47]  Rahul Jain,et al.  Partially Smoothed Information Measures , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[48]  William Slofstra,et al.  Perfect Parallel Repetition Theorem for Quantum Xor Proof Systems , 2007, Twenty-Second Annual IEEE Conference on Computational Complexity (CCC'07).

[49]  Armin Tavakoli,et al.  Informationally restricted correlations: a general framework for classical and quantum systems , 2020 .

[50]  Marco Tomamichel,et al.  A largely self-contained and complete security proof for quantum key distribution , 2015, 1506.08458.

[51]  Jaikumar Radhakrishnan,et al.  Prior entanglement, message compression and privacy in quantum communication , 2005, 20th Annual IEEE Conference on Computational Complexity (CCC'05).

[52]  Zvi Galil,et al.  Lower bounds on communication complexity , 1984, STOC '84.

[53]  Jaikumar Radhakrishnan,et al.  A property of quantum relative entropy with an application to privacy in quantum communication , 2009, JACM.

[54]  Jaikumar Radhakrishnan,et al.  The Communication Complexity of Correlation , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.