Design Drivers of Energy-Efficient Transport Aircraft

The fuel energy consumption of subsonic air transportation is examined. The focus is on identification and quantification of fundamental engineering design tradeoffs which drive the design of subsonic tube and wing transport aircraft. The sensitivities of energy efficiency to recent and forecast technology developments are also examined. Background and Motivation Early development of the modern jet transport, starting with the DeHavilland Comet and Boeing 707 in the 1950’s, was strongly driven by range requirements. With the imperatives of rising fuel costs and increased environmental concerns, more recent developments have focused on fuel economy and also on noise. Of the three main drivers of fuel economy — aerodynamics, structures, and propulsion — the latter has seen the largest improvements, not surprisingly because in the 1950’s turbojet and turbofan engines were a very young technology. As engine technology maturation has now reached the levels of the other disciplines, further improvements will have to come from all technologies. The recent and ongoing NASA Aeronautics research, 1 in particular the N+1,2,3 programs 2 target a wide range of aerodynamic, structural, and propulsion technologies towards this goal.

[1]  Sean Wakayama,et al.  Lifting surface design using multidisciplinary optimization , 1995 .

[2]  B. Matthew Knapp,et al.  Applications of a nonlinear wing planform design program , 1996 .

[3]  Ilan Kroo,et al.  Advanced Configurations for Very Large Subsonic Transport Airplanes , 1996 .

[4]  D Joslin Ronald,et al.  Overview of Laminar Flow Control , 1998 .

[5]  E. Torenbeek,et al.  Synthesis of Subsonic Airplane Design , 1979 .

[6]  Jack L. Kerrebrock,et al.  N+3 Aircraft Concept Designs and Trade Studies. Volume 1 , 2010 .

[7]  James I. Hileman,et al.  Payload Fuel Energy Efficiency as a Metric for Aviation Environmental Performance , 2008 .

[8]  D. Arnal,et al.  Linear Stability Theory Applied to Boundary Layers , 1996 .

[9]  Mark Drela,et al.  Development of the D8 Transport Configuration , 2011 .

[10]  Rakesh K. Kapania,et al.  Development of a framework for truss-braced wing conceptual MDO , 2011 .

[11]  W. Mason,et al.  ACSYNT aerodynamic estimation: an examination and validation for use in conceptual design , 1993 .

[12]  Bernard L. Koff,et al.  Gas Turbine Technology Evolution: A Designers Perspective , 2004 .

[13]  Ben Koff,et al.  Gas Turbine Technology Evolution - A Designer's Perspective , 2003 .

[14]  Daniel P. Raymer,et al.  Aircraft Design: A Conceptual Approach , 1989 .

[15]  D. Bushnell,et al.  Aircraft drag reduction—a review , 2003 .

[16]  R. H. Liebeck,et al.  Design of the Blended Wing Body Subsonic Transport , 2002 .

[17]  Michimasa Fujino,et al.  Natural-Laminar-Flow Airfoil Development for a Lightweight Business Jet , 2003 .

[18]  S. M. Sliwa Economic evaluation of flying-qualities design criteria for a transport configured with relaxed static stability , 1980 .

[19]  J. Wolkovitch,et al.  The joined wing - An overview , 1985 .

[20]  P. Gelhausen,et al.  ACSYNT - A standards-based system for parametric, computer aided conceptual design of aircraft , 1992 .

[21]  J. P. Johnston,et al.  An experimental study of turbulent boundary layer on rough walls , 1966 .