Loss-based proportional fairness in multihop wireless networks

Proportional fairness is a widely accepted form of allocating transmission resources in communication systems. For wired networks, the combination of a simple probabilistic packet marking strategy together with a scheduling algorithm aware of two packet classes can meet a given proportional vector of n loss probabilities, to an arbitrary degree of approximation, as long as the packet loss gap between the two basic classes is sufficiently large. In contrast, for wireless networks, proportional fairness is a challenging problem because of random channel variations and contention for transmitting. In this paper, we show that under the physical model, i.e., when receivers regard collisions and interference as noise, the same packet marking strategy at the network layer can also yield proportional differentiation and nearly optimal throughput. Thus, random access or interference due to incoherent transmissions do not impair the feasibility of engineering a prescribed end-to-end loss-based proportional fairness vector. We consider explicitly multihop transmission and the cases of Markovian traffic with a two-priority scheduler, as well as orthogonal modulation with power splitting. In both cases, it is shown that sharp differentiation in loss probabilities at the link layer is achievable without the need to coordinate locally the transmission of frames or packets among neighboring nodes. Given this, a novel distributed procedure to adapt the marking probabilities so as to attain exact fairness is also developed. Numerical experiments are used to validate the design.

[1]  Panganamala Ramana Kumar,et al.  RHEINISCH-WESTFÄLISCHE TECHNISCHE HOCHSCHULE AACHEN , 2001 .

[2]  H. Vincent Poor,et al.  Queue Back-Pressure Random Access in Multihop Wireless Networks: Optimality and Stability , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[3]  Donald F. Towsley,et al.  Modeling TCP Reno performance: a simple model and its empirical validation , 2000, TNET.

[4]  L. Mirsky,et al.  The Theory of Matrices , 1961, The Mathematical Gazette.

[5]  R. Srikant,et al.  End-to-end congestion control schemes: utility functions, random losses and ECN marks , 2003, TNET.

[6]  Eytan Modiano,et al.  Fairness and optimal stochastic control for heterogeneous networks , 2005, INFOCOM.

[7]  H. Vincent Poor,et al.  Redefinition of max-min fairness in multi-hop wireless networks , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[8]  D. Stiliadis,et al.  Rate-proportional servers: a design methodology for fair queueing algorithms , 1998, TNET.

[9]  Sergio Verdú,et al.  A general formula for channel capacity , 1994, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[10]  Leandros Tassiulas,et al.  Resource Allocation and Cross-Layer Control in Wireless Networks , 2006, Found. Trends Netw..

[11]  Andrés Suárez-González,et al.  A new design for end-to-end proportional loss differentiation in IP networks , 2010, Comput. Networks.

[12]  Ishai Menache,et al.  Capacity management and equilibrium for proportional QoS , 2008 .

[13]  Leandros Tassiulas,et al.  Resource Allocation and Cross Layer Control in Wireless Networks (Foundations and Trends in Networking, V. 1, No. 1) , 2006 .

[14]  R. Srikant,et al.  Fair scheduling in wireless packet networks , 1999, TNET.

[15]  Abbas El Gamal,et al.  Network Information Theory , 2021, 2021 IEEE 3rd International Conference on Advanced Trends in Information Theory (ATIT).

[16]  Shlomo Shamai,et al.  Fading Channels: Information-Theoretic and Communication Aspects , 1998, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[17]  Debasis Mitra,et al.  Effective bandwidth of general Markovian traffic sources and admission control of high speed networks , 1993, TNET.

[18]  Joel E. Cohen,et al.  Random evolutions and the spectral radius of a non-negative matrix , 1979, Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[19]  Candice King,et al.  Fundamentals of wireless communications , 2013, 2014 67th Annual Conference for Protective Relay Engineers.

[20]  Shlomo Shamai,et al.  Capacity of Channels With Frequency-Selective and Time-Selective Fading , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[21]  Frank Kelly,et al.  Rate control for communication networks: shadow prices, proportional fairness and stability , 1998, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[22]  L. Massouli'e Structural properties of proportional fairness: Stability and insensitivity , 2007, 0707.4542.

[23]  Israel Bar-David,et al.  Capacity and coding for the Gilbert-Elliot channels , 1989, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[24]  Weihua Zhuang,et al.  An optimization framework for balancing throughput and fairness in wireless networks with QoS support , 2008, IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun..

[25]  Parameswaran Ramanathan,et al.  Proportional differentiated services: delay differentiation and packet scheduling , 2002, TNET.

[26]  F. R. Gantmakher The Theory of Matrices , 1984 .

[27]  Huw Oliver,et al.  Proportional fair throughput allocation in multirate IEEE 802.11e wireless LANs , 2007, Wirel. Networks.

[28]  Ken R. Duffy,et al.  Existence and uniqueness of fair rate allocations in lossy wireless networks , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[29]  H. Boche,et al.  Nash Bargaining and Proportional Fairness for Wireless Systems , 2009, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking.