Throughput and Delay Driven Access Point Placement

With higher rates and increased diversity, distributed massive MIMO systems show promise. In this work, we look at such a system with no collaboration between Access Points (APs). We address the AP placement problem with two criteria in mind: throughput and delay. While the former deals with optimal AP locations given a user distribution, the latter adds a constraint of equal user access to the APs. In this regard, we propose the Cell Equalized Lloyd Algorithm (CELA), which in addition to the steps of the Lloyd algorithm, moves users from cells with more users to cells with fewer users in order to equalize the number of users in each cell without significantly affecting user throughput. Normalized user rate and user access count metrics are employed to evaluate the system characteristics. The performance of CELA is compared with that of the traditional Lloyd algorithm, and while a slight reduction in throughput is observed, the increase in user access outweighs this reduction.

[1]  Seung-Jae Han,et al.  Cell Breathing Techniques for Load Balancing in Wireless LANs , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing.

[2]  Erik G. Larsson,et al.  Massive MIMO for next generation wireless systems , 2013, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[3]  Thomas L. Marzetta,et al.  Noncooperative Cellular Wireless with Unlimited Numbers of Base Station Antennas , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[4]  Anthony Ng'oma,et al.  Experimental Study of Distributed Massive MIMO (DM-MIMO) in In-building Fiber-Wireless Networks , 2018, 2018 Optical Fiber Communications Conference and Exposition (OFC).

[5]  Jiangzhou Wang,et al.  Distributed Antenna Systems for Mobile Communications in High Speed Trains , 2012, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[6]  Bhaskar D. Rao,et al.  Precoding and Power Optimization in Cell-Free Massive MIMO Systems , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[7]  Hamid Jafarkhani,et al.  Energy efficiency in two-tiered wireless sensor networks , 2016, 2017 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC).

[8]  Inkyu Lee,et al.  Antenna Placement Optimization for Distributed Antenna Systems , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[9]  Erik G. Larsson,et al.  Cell-Free Massive MIMO Versus Small Cells , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[10]  Kien T. Truong,et al.  The viability of distributed antennas for massive MIMO systems , 2013, 2013 Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers.

[11]  Tzu-Chieh Tsai,et al.  IEEE 802.11 Hot Spot Load Balance and QoS-Maintained Seamless Roaming , 2003 .

[12]  Luiz A. DaSilva,et al.  Deployment of UAV-mounted access points according to spatial user locations in two-tier cellular networks , 2016, 2016 Wireless Days (WD).

[13]  Ming Chen,et al.  Antenna location design for generalized distributed antenna systems , 2009, IEEE Communications Letters.

[14]  Yongming Huang,et al.  Distributed Multicell Beamforming With Limited Intercell Coordination , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[15]  Giuseppe Caire,et al.  Scalable Synchronization and Reciprocity Calibration for Distributed Multiuser MIMO , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[16]  Lars Thiele,et al.  Coordinated multipoint: Concepts, performance, and field trial results , 2011, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[17]  Elina Nayebi,et al.  TDD Massive MIMO Systems: Channel Estimation, Power Optimization, and Access Point Location Design , 2018 .

[18]  Allen Gersho,et al.  Vector quantization and signal compression , 1991, The Kluwer international series in engineering and computer science.

[19]  Chengwen Xing,et al.  Performance Analysis and Location Optimization for Massive MIMO Systems With Circularly Distributed Antennas , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[20]  A. Jalali On cell breathing in CDMA networks , 1998, ICC '98. 1998 IEEE International Conference on Communications. Conference Record. Affiliated with SUPERCOMM'98 (Cat. No.98CH36220).