Biomechanics and FE Modelling of Aneurysm: Review and Advances in Computational Models

Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) disease is the 18th most common cause of death in all individuals and the 15th most common in individuals aged over 65 [48]. Clinical treatment for this disorder can consist of open surgical repair or, more recently, of minimally invasive endovascular repair procedures [71]. However, both clinical treatments present significant risks and, consequently, require specific patient selection. Given the risks of current repair techniques, during the course of an aneurysm it is important to determine when the risk of rupture justifies the risk of repair. In this scenario, how to determine the rupture risk of an aneurysm is still an open question. Currently, the trend in determining the severity of an AAA is to use the maximum diameter criterion. Unfortunately, this criterion is only a general rule and not a reliable indicator since small aneurysms can also rupture, as reported in autopsy studies, while many aneurysms can become very large without rupturing [16]. The maximum diameter criterion, in fact, is based on the law of Laplace that establish a linear relationship between diameter and wall stress. However, the law of Laplace is simply based on cylindrical geometries, where only one radius of curvature is involved, whereas aneurysms are complex structures, and therefore the law fails to predict realistic wall stresses. From a biomechanical point of view, rupture events occur when acting wall stresses exceed the tensile strength of the degenerated aortic abdominal (AA) wall. Biomechanics relates the function of a physiological system to its structure and its objective is to deduce the function of a system from its geometry, material properties and boundary conditions based on the balance laws of mechanics (e.g. conservation of mass, momentum and energy). Consequently, from a more general and extensive perspective, the stress state in a body is determined by several factors such as geometry, material properties, load and boundary conditions. In order to understand the capability to estimate the potential rupture risk, it is fundamental to capture the mechanical response of the aortic tissue and its changes during aneurysmal formation. In fact, while, to date, the precise pathogenesis of AAA is poorly understood, it is well known that this change significantly impact on the structure of the aortic wall and on its mechanical behavior.

[1]  A. Miniño,et al.  Deaths: preliminary data for 2000. , 2001, National vital statistics reports : from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics, National Vital Statistics System.

[2]  Ray W. Ogden,et al.  Anisotropy and Nonlinear Elasticity in Arterial Wall Mechanics , 2009 .

[3]  Manuel Doblaré,et al.  Mechanical stresses in abdominal aortic aneurysms: influence of diameter, asymmetry, and material anisotropy. , 2008, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[4]  D. Brewster,et al.  Autopsy Study of Unoperated Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: The Case for Early Resection , 1977, Circulation.

[5]  Evelyn P Whitlock,et al.  Screening for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: A Best-Evidence Systematic Review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force , 2005, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[6]  J Swedenborg,et al.  The impact of intraluminal thrombus failure on the mechanical stress in the wall of abdominal aortic aneurysms. , 2011, European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery.

[7]  Frans van de Vosse,et al.  Biomechanical properties of abdominal aortic aneurysms assessed by simultaneously measured pressure and volume changes in humans. , 2008, Journal of vascular surgery.

[8]  A. C. Burton,et al.  The reason for the shape of the distensibility curves of arteries. , 1957, Canadian journal of biochemistry and physiology.

[9]  Paola Forte,et al.  Investigation on the effect of the wall thickness in rupture risk estimation of AAA by a probabilistic finite element approach , 2010 .

[10]  M. R. Roach,et al.  The composition and mechanical properties of abdominal aortic aneurysms. , 1994, Journal of vascular surgery.

[11]  Zhi-Yong Li,et al.  Association Between Aneurysm Shoulder Stress and Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Expansion: A Longitudinal Follow-Up Study , 2010, Circulation.

[12]  Mark F Fillinger,et al.  In vivo analysis of mechanical wall stress and abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture risk. , 2002, Journal of vascular surgery.

[13]  M. Webster,et al.  Ex vivo biomechanical behavior of abdominal aortic aneurysm: Assessment using a new mathematical model , 1996, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[14]  Richard J. Beckman,et al.  A Comparison of Three Methods for Selecting Values of Input Variables in the Analysis of Output From a Computer Code , 2000, Technometrics.

[15]  M. Webster,et al.  Wall stress distribution on three-dimensionally reconstructed models of human abdominal aortic aneurysm. , 2000, Journal of vascular surgery.

[16]  J. Roy,et al.  PP52. Using Finite Element Analysis to Assess Rupture Risk in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms Including the Effect of the Intraluminal Thrombus , 2009 .

[17]  W. Nichols,et al.  McDonald's Blood Flow in Arteries: Theoretical, Experimental and Clinical Principles , 1998 .

[18]  M. O'Rourke,et al.  Mechanical factors in arterial aging: a clinical perspective. , 2007, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[19]  A. Becker,et al.  Extracellular matrix of the human aortic media: An ultrastructural histochemical and immunohistochemical study of the adult aortic media , 2000, The Anatomical record.

[20]  M L Raghavan,et al.  Toward a biomechanical tool to evaluate rupture potential of abdominal aortic aneurysm: identification of a finite strain constitutive model and evaluation of its applicability. , 2000, Journal of biomechanics.

[21]  J. S. Yao,et al.  Collagen types and matrix protein content in human abdominal aortic aneurysms. , 1989, Journal of vascular surgery.

[22]  Y C Fung,et al.  Three-dimensional stress distribution in arteries. , 1983, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[23]  Y. Fung,et al.  Pseudoelasticity of arteries and the choice of its mathematical expression. , 1979, The American journal of physiology.

[24]  Frans N van de Vosse,et al.  Effects of wall calcifications in patient-specific wall stress analyses of abdominal aortic aneurysms. , 2007, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[25]  Mark J Sculpher,et al.  Endovascular versus Open Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm , 2011 .

[26]  David A. Vorp,et al.  Towards A Noninvasive Method for Determination of Patient-Specific Wall Strength Distribution in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms , 2006, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[27]  C. Kleinstreuer,et al.  Invariant-based anisotropic constitutive models of the healthy and aneurysmal abdominal aortic wall. , 2009, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[28]  Jonathan H. Gillard,et al.  Association Between Aneurysm Shoulder Stress and Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Expansion: A Longitudinal Follow-Up Study , 2010, Circulation.

[29]  D. Vorp,et al.  Biomechanics of abdominal aortic aneurysm. , 2007, Journal of biomechanics.

[30]  Urs Utzinger,et al.  Microstructural and biomechanical alterations of the human aorta as a function of age and location , 2010, Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology.

[31]  R N Vaishnav,et al.  Nonlinear anisotropic elastic properties of the canine aorta. , 1972, Biophysical journal.

[32]  Jay D. Humphrey,et al.  A CONSTRAINED MIXTURE MODEL FOR GROWTH AND REMODELING OF SOFT TISSUES , 2002 .

[33]  F. Puccio,et al.  Anisotropic AAA: computational comparison between four and two fiber family material models. , 2011, Journal of biomechanics.

[34]  J. D. Humphrey,et al.  On constitutive descriptors of the biaxial mechanical behaviour of human abdominal aorta and aneurysms , 2011, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[35]  Jiaquan Xu,et al.  Deaths: preliminary data for 2011. , 2012 .

[36]  T. Christian Gasser,et al.  An irreversible constitutive model for fibrous soft biological tissue : A 3-D microfiber approach with demonstrative application to abdominal aortic aneurysms , 2011 .

[37]  Abeera Abbas,et al.  Can We Predict Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm (AAA) Progression and Rupture by Non-Invasive Imaging?—A Systematic Review , 2011 .

[38]  J D Humphrey,et al.  Normal basilar artery structure and biaxial mechanical behaviour , 2008, Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering.

[39]  M. Webster,et al.  Effect of intraluminal thrombus on wall stress in patient-specific models of abdominal aortic aneurysm. , 2002, Journal of vascular surgery.

[40]  D A Vorp,et al.  Wall Strength and Stiffness of Aneurysmal and Nonaneurysmal Abdominal Aorta , 1996, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[41]  Gerhard A. Holzapfel,et al.  Nonlinear Solid Mechanics: A Continuum Approach for Engineering Science , 2000 .

[42]  Jongeun Choi,et al.  On parameter estimation for biaxial mechanical behavior of arteries. , 2009, Journal of biomechanics.

[43]  M M Thompson,et al.  A review of biological factors implicated in abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture. , 2005, European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery.

[44]  D Bergqvist,et al.  Diameter and compliance in the male human abdominal aorta: influence of age and aortic aneurysm. , 1992, European journal of vascular surgery.

[45]  D. Vorp,et al.  The effects of aneurysm on the biaxial mechanical behavior of human abdominal aorta. , 2006, Journal of biomechanics.

[46]  R. Ogden,et al.  A New Constitutive Framework for Arterial Wall Mechanics and a Comparative Study of Material Models , 2000 .

[47]  J D Humphrey,et al.  A constrained mixture model for arterial adaptations to a sustained step change in blood flow , 2003, Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology.

[48]  Shmuel Einav,et al.  Abdominal aortic aneurysm risk of rupture: patient-specific FSI simulations using anisotropic model. , 2009, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[49]  M. Thubrikar,et al.  Mechanical properties of abdominal aortic aneurysm wall , 2001, Journal of medical engineering & technology.

[50]  D A Vorp,et al.  Association of intraluminal thrombus in abdominal aortic aneurysm with local hypoxia and wall weakening. , 2001, Journal of vascular surgery.

[51]  M. Sacks Biaxial Mechanical Evaluation of Planar Biological Materials , 2000 .

[52]  Madhavan L Raghavan,et al.  Regional distribution of wall thickness and failure properties of human abdominal aortic aneurysm. , 2006, Journal of biomechanics.

[53]  G. Holzapfel,et al.  A structural model for the viscoelastic behavior of arterial walls: Continuum formulation and finite element analysis , 2002 .

[54]  L. A. Anderson Abdominal aortic aneurysm. , 2001, The Journal of cardiovascular nursing.

[55]  J D Humphrey,et al.  A new constitutive formulation for characterizing the mechanical behavior of soft tissues. , 1987, Biophysical journal.

[56]  J. Humphrey Vascular Adaptation and Mechanical Homeostasis at Tissue, Cellular, and Sub-cellular Levels , 2007, Cell Biochemistry and Biophysics.

[57]  J. Baxa,et al.  Assessment of abdominal aortic aneurysm wall distensibility with electrocardiography-gated computed tomography. , 2011, Annals of vascular surgery.

[58]  P B Dobrin,et al.  Pathophysiology and pathogenesis of aortic aneurysms. Current concepts. , 1989, The Surgical clinics of North America.

[59]  Jonathan P Vande Geest,et al.  Biomechanical properties of ruptured versus electively repaired abdominal aortic aneurysm wall tissue. , 2006, Journal of vascular surgery.

[60]  SE Greenwald,et al.  Ageing of the conduit arteries , 2007, The Journal of pathology.

[61]  David A. Vorp,et al.  Mechanical wall stress in abdominal aortic aneurysm: influence of diameter and asymmetry. , 1998, Journal of vascular surgery.

[62]  Peter Regitnig,et al.  Determination of the layer-specific distributed collagen fibre orientations in human thoracic and abdominal aortas and common iliac arteries , 2012, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[63]  R P Vito,et al.  Two-dimensional stress-strain relationship for canine pericardium. , 1990, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[64]  J D Humphrey,et al.  Mechanics of the arterial wall: review and directions. , 1995, Critical reviews in biomedical engineering.

[65]  R H Cox,et al.  Regional variation of series elasticity in canine arterial smooth muscles. , 1978, The American journal of physiology.

[66]  J Jeffrey Alexander,et al.  The pathobiology of aortic aneurysms. , 2004, The Journal of surgical research.

[67]  Stefan Reh,et al.  Probabilistic finite element analysis using ANSYS , 2006 .

[68]  Manuel Doblaré,et al.  The Effect of Material Model Formulation in the Stress Analysis of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms , 2009, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[69]  Simona Celi,et al.  Advances in finite element simulations of elastosonography for breast lesion detection. , 2011, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[70]  J. Powell,et al.  Mechanical properties of the aneurysmal aorta , 1992, The British journal of surgery.

[71]  Jay D. Humphrey,et al.  Theory of small on large: Potential utility in computations of fluid–solid interactions in arteries , 2007 .

[72]  F. Di Puccio,et al.  Review of Experimental Investigations on Compressibility of Arteries and Introduction of a New Apparatus , 2012 .

[73]  Alessandro Borghi,et al.  3D geometric reconstruction of thoracic aortic aneurysms , 2006, Biomedical engineering online.

[74]  C. M. Scotti,et al.  Wall stress and flow dynamics in abdominal aortic aneurysms: finite element analysis vs. fluid–structure interaction , 2008, Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering.

[75]  Michael S Sacks,et al.  Age dependency of the biaxial biomechanical behavior of human abdominal aorta. , 2004, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[76]  R. Vito,et al.  Blood vessel constitutive models-1995-2002. , 2003, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[77]  J. P. Boehler,et al.  Introduction to the Invariant Formulation of Anisotropic Constitutive Equations , 1987 .

[78]  W A Wall,et al.  Impact of calcifications on patient-specific wall stress analysis of abdominal aortic aneurysms , 2010, Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology.

[79]  Mark F Fillinger,et al.  Prediction of rupture risk in abdominal aortic aneurysm during observation: wall stress versus diameter. , 2003, Journal of vascular surgery.

[80]  Zvi Hashin,et al.  Continuum Theory of the Mechanics of Fibre-Reinforced Composites , 1984 .

[81]  E. Kuhl,et al.  A continuum model for remodeling in living structures , 2007 .