Alectinib versus chemotherapy in crizotinib-pretreated anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive non-small-cell lung cancer: results from the phase III ALUR study

Abstract Background This is the first trial to directly compare efficacy and safety of alectinib versus standard chemotherapy in advanced/metastatic anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients who have progressed on, or were intolerant to, crizotinib. Patients and methods ALUR (MO29750; NCT02604342) was a randomized, multicenter, open-label, phase III trial of alectinib versus chemotherapy in advanced/metastatic ALK-positive NSCLC patients previously treated with platinum-based doublet chemotherapy and crizotinib. Patients were randomized 2 : 1 to receive alectinib 600 mg twice daily or chemotherapy (pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 or docetaxel 75 mg/m2, both every 3 weeks) until disease progression, death, or withdrawal. Primary end point was investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS). Results Altogether, 107 patients were randomized (alectinib, n = 72; chemotherapy, n = 35) in 13 countries across Europe and Asia. Median investigator-assessed PFS was 9.6 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 6.9–12.2] with alectinib and 1.4 months (95% CI: 1.3–1.6) with chemotherapy [hazard ratio (HR) 0.15 (95% CI: 0.08–0.29); P < 0.001]. Independent Review Committee-assessed PFS was also significantly longer with alectinib [HR 0.32 (95% CI: 0.17–0.59); median PFS was 7.1 months (95% CI: 6.3–10.8) with alectinib and 1.6 months (95% CI: 1.3–4.1) with chemotherapy]. In patients with measurable baseline central nervous system (CNS) disease (alectinib, n = 24; chemotherapy, n = 16), CNS objective response rate was significantly higher with alectinib (54.2%) versus chemotherapy (0%; P < 0.001). Grade ≥3 adverse events were more common with chemotherapy (41.2%) than alectinib (27.1%). Incidence of AEs leading to study-drug discontinuation was lower with alectinib (5.7%) than chemotherapy (8.8%), despite alectinib treatment duration being longer (20.1 weeks versus 6.0 weeks). Conclusion Alectinib significantly improved systemic and CNS efficacy versus chemotherapy for crizotinib-pretreated ALK-positive NSCLC patients, with a favorable safety profile. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02604342; Roche study MO29750

[1]  G. Scagliotti,et al.  Ceritinib versus chemotherapy in patients with ALK-rearranged non-small-cell lung cancer previously given chemotherapy and crizotinib (ASCEND-5): a randomised, controlled, open-label, phase 3 trial. , 2017, The Lancet. Oncology.

[2]  Young Hak Kim,et al.  Alectinib versus crizotinib in patients with ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (J-ALEX): an open-label, randomised phase 3 trial , 2017, The Lancet.

[3]  Rafal Dziadziuszko,et al.  Alectinib versus Crizotinib in Untreated ALK‐Positive Non–Small‐Cell Lung Cancer , 2017, The New England journal of medicine.

[4]  N. Yeh,et al.  Extended Survival and Prognostic Factors for Patients With ALK-Rearranged Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer and Brain Metastasis. , 2016, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[5]  R. Govindan,et al.  Alectinib in Crizotinib-Refractory ALK-Rearranged Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Phase II Global Study. , 2016, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[6]  M. Socinski,et al.  Alectinib in ALK-positive, crizotinib-resistant, non-small-cell lung cancer: a single-group, multicentre, phase 2 trial. , 2016, The Lancet. Oncology.

[7]  Nicholas G Zaorsky,et al.  Targeting brain metastases in ALK-rearranged non-small-cell lung cancer. , 2015, The Lancet. Oncology.

[8]  Lucio Crinò,et al.  Clinical Experience With Crizotinib in Patients With Advanced ALK-Rearranged Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer and Brain Metastases. , 2015, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[9]  H. Wakelee,et al.  Treatment, overall survival, and costs in patients with ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer after crizotinib monotherapy , 2015, Current medical research and opinion.

[10]  F. Cappuzzo,et al.  First-line crizotinib versus chemotherapy in ALK-positive lung cancer. , 2014, The New England journal of medicine.

[11]  P. Jänne,et al.  Clinical benefit of continuing ALK inhibition with crizotinib beyond initial disease progression in patients with advanced ALK-positive NSCLC. , 2014, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[12]  P. Iyengar,et al.  Isolated central nervous system progression on Crizotinib , 2012, Cancer biology & therapy.