Significance to health of mercury used in dental practice: a review. Council on Dental Materials and Devices. Council on Dental Research.

Prepared by N. W. Rupp, DDS G. C. Paffenbarger, DDS, Washington, DC In view of the widespread interest and concern over possible mercury poisoning and mercury pollution of rivers and lakes, th is review of the literature was undertaken for the mem bers of the profession to de­ termine in what way, if any, dentistry is implicated. The review evaluates the exposure of the patient to mercury and the long-term exposure of dental per­ sonnel, makes suggestions for m inimizing any pos­ sible mercury hazards to the patient and dental per­ sonnel, and restates methods of disposing of mer­ cury residue and waste amalgam to avoid any pos­ sible contamination of the environment through dental procedures. This review does not indicate any significant hazard to the patient. There is no contamination of the environment if proper office procedures are followed and if scrap amalgam is collected and salvaged. Further, the review con­ cludes that proper mercury hygiene minimizes any possible danger to dental personnel. The report, however, re-emphasizes the importance of the eval­ uation from time to time by the profession of its procedures as new information becomes available on the physiological significance of the increased exposure to mercury from all sources.

[1]  L. Goldwater,et al.  Absorption and excretion of mercury in man. I. Relationship of mercury in blood and urine. , 1962, Archives of environmental health.

[2]  L. Goldwater THE TOXICOLOGY OF INORGANIC MERCURY , 1957, Occupational health review.

[3]  F. A. Patty,et al.  Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology , 1958 .

[4]  L. Goldwater,et al.  ABSORPTION AND EXCRETION OF MERCURY IN MAN. VI. SIGNIFICANCE OF MERCURY IN URINE. , 1964, Archives of environmental health.

[5]  G. Paffenbarger,et al.  Poor mercury hygiene from ultrasonic amalgam condensation. , 1971, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[6]  P A Gronka,et al.  Mercury vapor exposures in dental offices. , 1970, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[7]  A. Holmes,et al.  THE CONTROL OF MERCURY METAL IN THE LABORATORY , 1957 .

[8]  N. Irving Sax,et al.  Dangerous properties of industrial materials , 1957 .

[9]  M. Joselow,et al.  Absorption and excretion of mercury in man. XIV. Salivary excretion of mercury and its relationship to blood and urine mercury. , 1968, Archives of environmental health.

[10]  K. Wing,et al.  Penetration of metallic ions from restorations into teeth. , 1968, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[11]  A. Signy HANDBOOK OF LABORATORY SAFETY , 1968 .

[12]  Karl O. Fkykiiolm,et al.  Studies on the Penetration of Mercury Through the Dental Hard Tissues, Using Hg203 in Silver Amalgam Fillings , 1955 .

[13]  L. Grossman,et al.  Amount of Mercury Vapor in Air of Dental Offices and Laboratories , 1949, Journal of dental research.

[14]  L. Goldwater,et al.  Absorption and excretion of mercury in man. X. Dental amalgams as a source of urinary mercury. , 1966, Archives of environmental health.

[15]  M. Joselow,et al.  Absorption and excretion of mercury in man. XV. Occupational exposure among dentists. , 1968, Archives of environmental health.

[16]  M. Massler,et al.  Action of amalgam on dentin. , 1953, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[17]  P. Yates,et al.  Fatal mercury intoxication in a dental surgery assistant. , 1969, British dental journal.

[18]  R. Flinn,et al.  Hazard of mercury vapor in scientific laboratories , 1941 .