Aging can spare recollection-based retrieval monitoring: the importance of event distinctiveness.

The authors investigated two retrieval-monitoring processes. Subjects studied red words and pictures and then decided whether test words had been studied in red font (red word test) or as pictures (picture test). Memory confusions were lower on the picture test than on the red word test, implicating a distinctiveness heuristic. Memory confusions also were lower when study formats were mutually exclusive (the same item was never studied as both a red word and a picture), compared with a nonexclusive condition, implicating a recall-to-reject process. When the to-be-recollected events were pictures, older adults used each monitoring strategy as effectively as did younger adults.

[1]  D. Schacter,et al.  Aging and the seven sins of memory , 2003 .

[2]  L L Jacoby,et al.  An opposition procedure for detecting age-related deficits in recollection: telling effects of repetition. , 1997, Psychology and aging.

[3]  Daniel L. Schacter,et al.  Suppressing False Recognition in Younger and Older Adults: The Distinctiveness Heuristic ☆ ☆☆ ★ , 1999 .

[4]  D. Schacter,et al.  Two types of recollection-based monitoring in younger and older adults: Recall-to-reject and the distinctiveness heuristic , 2006, Memory.

[5]  Daniel L. Schacter,et al.  Prefrontal Activity and Diagnostic Monitoring of Memory Retrieval: fMRI of the Criterial Recollection Task , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[6]  L L Jacoby,et al.  Ironic effects of repetition: measuring age-related differences in memory. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[7]  Marcia K. Johnson,et al.  Aging and source monitoring: cognitive processes and neuropsychological correlates. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[8]  D. Schacter,et al.  Perceptual specificity in visual object priming: functional magnetic resonance imaging evidence for a laterality difference in fusiform cortex , 2001, Neuropsychologia.

[9]  Todd C Jones,et al.  Conjunction errors in recognition memory: modality-free errors for older adults but not for young adults. , 2005, Acta psychologica.

[10]  V. Leirer,et al.  Development and validation of a geriatric depression screening scale: a preliminary report. , 1982, Journal of psychiatric research.

[11]  Daniel L. Schacter,et al.  The role of hippocampus and frontal cortex in age‐ related memory changes: a PET study , 1996, Neuroreport.

[12]  Daniel L. Schacter,et al.  Reducing memory errors: The distinctiveness heuristic. , 2006 .

[13]  J. Starns,et al.  The roles of associative strength and source memorability in the contextualization of false memory , 2006 .

[14]  Matthew Flatt,et al.  PsyScope: An interactive graphic system for designing and controlling experiments in the psychology laboratory using Macintosh computers , 1993 .

[15]  F. Craik,et al.  The effects of aging and divided attention on memory for item and associative information. , 2003, Psychology and aging.

[16]  J. Worthen,et al.  Distinctiveness and memory. , 2006 .

[17]  Anthony R. McIntosh,et al.  Task-related activity in prefrontal cortex and its relation to recognition memory performance in young and old adults , 2005, Neuropsychologia.

[18]  Marcia K. Johnson,et al.  Source monitoring. , 1993, Psychological bulletin.

[19]  E. Bizzi,et al.  The Cognitive Neurosciences , 1996 .

[20]  Rugg.  Retrieval processes in human memory: Electrophysiological and fMRI evidence , 2004 .

[21]  Daniel L. Schacter,et al.  Reducing false recognition with criterial recollection tests: Distinctiveness heuristic versus criterion shifts , 2004 .

[22]  K S Multhaup,et al.  Aging, source, and decision criteria: when false fame errors do and do not occur. , 1995, Psychology and aging.