Nontrivial decay of aftershock density with distance in Southern California
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] P. Shearer. Reply to comment by S. Hainzl on “Self‐similar earthquake triggering, Båth's Law, and foreshock/aftershock magnitudes: Simulations, theory and results for southern California” , 2013 .
[2] Yosihiko Ogata,et al. Statistical Models for Earthquake Occurrences and Residual Analysis for Point Processes , 1988 .
[3] D. Wells,et al. New empirical relationships among magnitude, rupture length, rupture width, rupture area, and surface displacement , 1994, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.
[4] K. Felzer,et al. A model of earthquake triggering probabilities and application to dynamic deformations constrained by ground motion observations , 2008 .
[5] Yih‐Min Wu,et al. Empirical Relationships between Aftershock Zone Dimensions and Moment Magnitudes for Plate Boundary Earthquakes in Taiwan , 2013 .
[6] S. A. Mazhkenov,et al. On Similarity in the Spatial Distribution of Seismicity , 2013 .
[7] Tiago P. Peixoto,et al. Spatiotemporal correlations of aftershock sequences , 2010, 1004.1924.
[8] Yehuda Ben-Zion,et al. Earthquake clusters in southern California II: Classification and relation to physical properties of the crust , 2013 .
[9] B. Gutenberg,et al. Seismicity of the Earth , 1941 .
[10] M. Leonard. Earthquake Fault Scaling: Self‐Consistent Relating of Rupture Length, Width, Average Displacement, and Moment Release , 2010 .
[11] M. Baiesi,et al. Triggering cascades and statistical properties of aftershocks , 2012 .
[12] G. Molchan,et al. Aftershock identification: methods and new approaches , 1992 .
[13] P. Shearer. Self-similar earthquake triggering, Båth's law, and foreshock/aftershock magnitudes: Simulations, theory, and results for southern California , 2012 .
[14] John McCloskey,et al. Statistical evaluation of characteristic earthquakes in the frequency‐magnitude distributions of Sumatra and other subduction zone regions , 2009 .
[15] P. Shearer. Space-time clustering of seismicity in California and the distance dependence of earthquake triggering , 2012 .
[16] Sebastian Hainzl,et al. Dependence of the Omori‐Utsu law parameters on main shock magnitude: Observations and modeling , 2007 .
[17] Danijel Schorlemmer,et al. Probability of Detecting an Earthquake , 2008 .
[18] D. Vere-Jones,et al. Analyzing earthquake clustering features by using stochastic reconstruction , 2004 .
[19] Alvaro Corral. Local distributions and rate fluctuations in a unified scaling law for earthquakes. , 2003, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.
[20] G. Molchan,et al. On the spatial scaling of seismicity rate , 2005, physics/0511024.
[21] Danijel Schorlemmer,et al. Bayesian analysis of the modified Omori law , 2012 .
[22] Rodolfo Console,et al. Refining earthquake clustering models , 2003 .
[23] O. Lengliné,et al. Decay and expansion of the early aftershock activity following the 2011, Mw9.0 Tohoku earthquake , 2012 .
[24] D. Marsan,et al. Impact of Aseismic Transients on the Estimation of Aftershock Productivity Parameters , 2013 .
[25] Zhigang Peng,et al. Migration of early aftershocks following the 2004 Parkfield earthquake , 2009 .
[26] B. Enescu,et al. Impact of Earthquake Rupture Extensions on Parameter Estimations of Point-Process Models , 2008 .
[27] L. Knopoff,et al. Bursts of aftershocks, long-term precursors of strong earthquakes , 1980, Nature.
[28] D Sornette,et al. Diffusion of epicenters of earthquake aftershocks, Omori's law, and generalized continuous-time random walk models. , 2002, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.
[29] Yan Y. Kagan,et al. Aftershock Zone Scaling , 2002 .
[30] K. Felzer,et al. Decay of aftershock density with distance indicates triggering by dynamic stress , 2006, Nature.
[31] Christian Goltz,et al. Are seismic waiting time distributions universal , 2004 .
[32] J. Vidale,et al. Seismicity rate immediately before and after main shock rupture from high-frequency waveforms in Japan , 2007 .
[33] P. Shearer,et al. Applying a three-dimensional velocity model, waveform cross correlation, and cluster analysis to locate southern California seismicity from 1981 to 2005 , 2007 .
[34] Y. Ogata,et al. The Centenary of the Omori Formula for a Decay Law of Aftershock Activity , 1995 .
[35] Hiroo Kanamori,et al. The diversity of the physics of earthquakes , 2004, Proceedings of the Japan Academy. Series B, Physical and Biological Sciences.
[36] L. Knopoff,et al. Statistical Short-Term Earthquake Prediction , 1987, Science.
[37] P. Shearer,et al. Waveform Relocated Earthquake Catalog for Southern California (1981 to June 2011) , 2012 .
[38] Stefan Wiemer,et al. The influence of tectonic regimes on the earthquake size distribution: A case study for Italy , 2010 .
[39] Maya Paczuski,et al. Complex networks of earthquakes and aftershocks , 2004, physics/0408018.
[40] Y. Kagan,et al. Comparison of Short-Term and Time-Independent Earthquake Forecast Models for Southern California , 2006 .
[41] I. Zaliapin,et al. Earthquake clusters in southern California I: Identification and stability , 2013 .
[42] Y. Ogata. Space-Time Point-Process Models for Earthquake Occurrences , 1998 .
[43] Ilya Zaliapin,et al. Clustering analysis of seismicity and aftershock identification. , 2007, Physical review letters.
[44] Peter Grassberger,et al. Networks of recurrent events, a theory of records, and an application to finding causal signatures in seismicity. , 2008, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.
[45] D. Sornette,et al. Are aftershocks of large Californian earthquakes diffusing , 2003, physics/0303075.
[46] Á. Corral,et al. Scaling behavior of the earthquake intertime distribution: influence of large shocks and time scales in the Omori law. , 2012, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.
[47] Y. Kagan. Short-Term Properties of Earthquake Catalogs and Models of Earthquake Source , 2004 .
[48] Y. Kagan. Earthquake spatial distribution: the correlation dimension , 2006 .
[50] D. Marsan,et al. Extending Earthquakes' Reach Through Cascading , 2008, Science.
[51] L. Knopoff,et al. Is the sequence of earthquakes in Southern California, with aftershocks removed, Poissonian? , 1974, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.
[52] Olivier Lengliné,et al. A new estimation of the decay of aftershock density with distance to the mainshock , 2010 .
[53] Shinji Toda,et al. Decay of aftershock density with distance does not indicate triggering by dynamic stress , 2010, Nature.
[54] M. Baiesi,et al. Scale-free networks of earthquakes and aftershocks. , 2003, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.
[55] G. Brietzke,et al. Quantitative earthquake forecasts resulting from static stress triggering , 2010 .
[56] P. Reasenberg. Second‐order moment of central California seismicity, 1969–1982 , 1985 .
[57] D. Turcotte,et al. Missing data in aftershock sequences: explaining the deviations from scaling laws. , 2008, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.